An Image-Based Transfer Learning Approach for Using In Situ Processing Data to Predict Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Mechanical Properties
Source abstract
Abstract
The mitigation of material defects from additive manufacturing (AM) processes is critical to reliability in their fabricated parts and is enabled by modeling the complex relations between available build monitoring signals and final mechanical performance. To this end, the present study investigates a machine learning approach for predicting mechanical properties for Ti-6Al-4V fabricated through laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB) AM using in situ photodiode processing signals. Samples were fabricated under different processing parameters, varying laser powers and scan speeds for the purpose of probing a wide range of microstructure and property variations. Photodiode data were collected during fabrication, later to be arranged in image format and extracted to information-dense vectors by the transferal of deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) structures and weights pretrained on a large computer vision benchmark image database. The extracted features were then used to train and test a newly designed regression model for mechanical properties. Average cross-validation accuracies were found to be 98.7% (r2 value of 0.89) for the prediction of ultimate tensile strength, which ranged from 900 to 1150 MPa in the samples studied, and 93.1% (r2 value of 0.96) for the prediction of elongation to fracture, which ranged from 0 to 17%. Thus, with high accuracy and hardware-accelerated inference speeds, we demonstrate that a transfer learning framework can be used to predict strength and ductility of metal AM components based on processing signals in PBF-LB, illustrating a potential route toward real-time closed-loop control and process optimization of PBF-LB in industrial applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.001 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.10755210.1016/j.matdes.2018.107552 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10155210.1016/j.addma.2020.101552 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addma.2014.08.00210.1016/j.addma.2014.08.002 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00276-610.1016/S1359-6462(99)00276-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.06.01110.1016/j.jallcom.2006.06.011 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10291510.1016/j.addma.2022.102915 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10241410.1016/j.addma.2021.102414 ↗
9. 10.1089/3dp.2018.006010.1089/3dp.2018.0060 ↗
10. 10.3390/app1001036510.3390/app10010365 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.10622710.1016/j.ultras.2020.106227 ↗
12. 10.1016/J.MATDES.2016.01.09910.1016/J.MATDES.2016.01.099 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10236410.1016/j.addma.2021.102364 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.01510.1016/j.addma.2018.11.015 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.00410.1016/j.addma.2018.05.004 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.aax016210.1126/science.aax0162 ↗
17. 10.1088/2515-7639/abca7b10.1088/2515-7639/abca7b ↗
18. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.03010.1016/j.addma.2019.05.030 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10845-022-02039-310.1007/s10845-022-02039-3 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10845-023-02121-410.1007/s10845-023-02121-4 ↗
21. 10.1109/cvpr.2009.520684810.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_4810.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 ↗
23. 10.1039/D0NA00634C10.1039/D0NA00634C ↗
24. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10335710.1016/j.addma.2022.103357 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11102910.1016/j.matdes.2022.111029 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11753110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117531 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41598-018-31571-710.1038/s41598-018-31571-7 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10845-021-01829-510.1007/s10845-021-01829-5 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.dib.2023.10891110.1016/j.dib.2023.108911 ↗
30. 30. Ray N, Bisht M, Thijs L, et al. DMP Monitoring as a Process Optimization Tool for Direct Metal Printing (DMP) of Ti-6Al-4V. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication 2018: Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium—An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2018, Austin, TX, USA; 2018; pp. 2244–2253.
31. 31. Abadi M, Barham P, Chen J, et al. TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning. In: Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, OSDI 2016, Savannah, GA, USA; 2016; pp. 265–283.
32. 10.1109/ISBI.2008.454112610.1109/ISBI.2008.4541126 ↗
33. Simonyan K · arXiv preprint; · 2014
34. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.9010.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
35. Kingma DP · arXiv preprint; · 2014 · 1412
36. 10.1017/CBO978051177963310.1017/CBO9780511779633 ↗
37. 10.1023/A:102262741141110.1023/A:1022627411411 ↗
38. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10159210.1016/j.addma.2020.101592 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.00410.1016/j.addma.2018.12.004 ↗
41. 10.1520/E000810.1520/E0008 ↗