Temperature Analyses in Fused Filament Fabrication: From Filament Entering the Hot-End to the Printed Parts
Source abstract
Abstract
This article analyzes temperature fields and their variations in fused filament fabrication (FFF) from the filament entering the hot-end to the printed parts, aiming at a deeper understanding of the thermal process of this additive manufacturing technology. A standard E3D print head assembly was mounted on a robot arm for printing. A stable filament feeding region was determined with an upper limit in the volume flow rate at different nozzle temperatures. Within the limit, the steady-state temperature fields inside the hot-end were studied by a computational fluid dynamics model. Simulations indicated that the temperature became less homogeneous at higher flow rates, leading to a lower extrudate temperature at the nozzle outlet. These outlet temperatures were analyzed, validated, and used as input to simulate temperature variations in printed parts with a self-developed open-access numerical model. An interlayer time similarity rule was found in printing single-walled geometries, which specifies temperature similarities at the same interlayer time. The findings provide new insights into FFF processes, pointing out opportunities for improved production efficiency and scalability to large-scale manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Campus De Nayer, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium.
Department of Materials Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM F2792-12a Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies 2012. DOI: 10.1520/F2792-12A.2.
2. 10.1007/s00170-018-1843-y10.1007/s00170-018-1843-y ↗
3. Compton BG, , Post BK, , Duty CE, et al. Thermal analysis of additive manufacturing of large-scale thermoplastic polymer composites. Addit Manuf, 2017; 17:77–86.
4. 10.1089/3dp.2015.002110.1089/3dp.2015.0021 ↗
5. 10.1089/3dp.2018.015710.1089/3dp.2018.0157 ↗
6. 10.1089/3dp.2016.004510.1089/3dp.2016.0045 ↗
7. Phan DD, , Horner JS, , Swain ZR. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of the melting process in the fused filament fabrication additive manufacturing technique. Addit Manuf, 2020; 33:101161.
8. Serdeczny MP, , Comminal R, , Mollah MT, et al. Numerical modeling of the polymer flow through the hot-end in filament-based material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2020; 36:101454.
9. Nienhaus V, , Smith K, , Spiehl D, et al. Investigations on nozzle geometry in fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf, 2019; 28:711–718.
10. Serdeczny MP, , Comminal R, , Pedersen DB, et al. Experimental and analytical study of the polymer melt flow through the hot-end in material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2020; 32:100997.
11. 10.1122/1.502298210.1122/1.5022982 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.00710.1016/j.addma.2017.03.007 ↗
13. Luo C, , Wang X, , Migler KB, et al. Effects of feed rates on temperature profiles and feed forces in material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2020; 35:101361.
14. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.01510.1016/j.addma.2018.05.015 ↗
15. Pigeonneau F, , Xu D, , Vincent M, et al. Heating and flow computations of an amorphous polymer in the liquefier of a material extrusion 3D printer. Addit Manuf, 2020; 32:101001.
16. Anderegg DA, , Bryant HA, , Ruffin DC, et al. In-situ monitoring of polymer flow temperature and pressure in extrusion based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2019; 26:76–83.
17. 10.1115/1.168837710.1115/1.1688377 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.rcim.2018.05.01010.1016/j.rcim.2018.05.010 ↗
19. 10.1122/1.505464810.1122/1.5054648 ↗
20. 10.1122/1.497385210.1122/1.4973852 ↗
21. 10.1122/1.497683910.1122/1.4976839 ↗
22. McIlroy C, , Graham RS. Modelling flow-enhanced crystallisation during fused filament fabrication of semi-crystalline polymer melts. Addit Manuf, 2018; 24:323–340.
23. 10.1080/17452759.2014.98404210.1080/17452759.2014.984042 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.12310.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.123 ↗
25. Yu W, , Wang X, , Ferraris E, et al. Melt crystallization of PLA/Talc in fused filament fabrication. Mater Des, 2019; 108013. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108013.
26. 10.1007/s40964-020-00137-310.1007/s40964-020-00137-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jct.2004.05.00310.1016/j.jct.2004.05.003 ↗
28. Sin LT Rahmat AR Rahman WAWA. Polylactic Acid: PLA Biopolymer Technology and Applications (chapter 3) William Andrew London 2012.
29. 10.1016/j.addr.2016.06.01210.1016/j.addr.2016.06.012 ↗
30. 10.1122/1.54988810.1122/1.549888 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.09.00410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.09.004 ↗
32. [dataset] Advanced Manufacturing Lab. T4F3: Temperature for Fused Filament Fabrication. 2021. https://iiw.kuleuven.be/onderzoek/aml/technologyoffer/FFFthermalsimulation/T4F3 (last accessed on March1 2021).
33. 10.1007/s40964-019-00107-410.1007/s40964-019-00107-4 ↗
34. Luo C, , Wang X, , Migler KB, et al. Upper bound of feed rates in thermoplastic material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2020; 32:101019.
35. 10.1007/s10853-020-05057-910.1007/s10853-020-05057-9 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.00710.1016/j.addma.2016.06.007 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.04010.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.040 ↗