journal article·2019-12-01Open access

Silicone 3D Printing: Process Optimization, Product Biocompatibility, and Reliability of Silicone Meniscus Implants

Eric Luis, Houwen Matthew Pan, Swee Leong Sing, Anil Kumar Bastola, Guo Dong Goh, Guo Liang Goh, Heang Kuan Joel Tan, Ram Bajpai, Juha Song, Wai Yee Yeong

Abstract

A novel custom-made 3D silicone printer and two-part Ecoflex silicone resins were used to 3D-print standard-shaped silicone coupon and irregular-shaped meniscus structures via a heat-cured extrusion-based method. This article is segmented into three parts: (1) study on the effect of 3D printing parameters on dimensional accuracy and mechanical properties of 3D-printed silicone, (2) reliability and failure analysis of 3D-printed silicone according to ASTM D575 standards under monotonic and cyclic compressive loading, and (3) cytotoxicity of 3D-printed silicone by extraction method according to ISO 10993-12 for different extraction time and extract volume/surface area ratios. Based on analysis using regression method and analysis of variance, we found that the dimensional accuracy of lengths and widths is sensitive to both nozzle diameters and bed temperatures (BTs), while the height is only sensitive to BTs. Failure results were analyzed using the two-parameter Weibull probability distribution model and Weibull regression analysis and revealed that the Weibull modulus had a value greater than 1 in all groups, indicating an increasing failure rate with time for Ecoflex 30 and 50 meniscus implants. Results from quantitative cell proliferative assay exhibit statistically insignificant differences for all samples, pointing to the low cytotoxicity and excellent biocompatibility of printed silicone.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Singapore Centre for 3D Printing, School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

School of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Center for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chien School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.18063/ijb.v4i2.15110.18063/ijb.v4i2.151 ↗
2. Vaezi M · Int J Bioprinting · 2015 · 1 · 6610.18063/IJB.2015.01.004 ↗
3. 10.18063/IJB.2016.02.00910.18063/IJB.2016.02.009 ↗
4. Boland T · Adv Mater Process · 2007 · 165 · 51
5. Tan EYS · Int J Bioprinting · 2015 · 1 · 4910.18063/IJB.2015.01.003 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.05110.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.051 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.00910.1016/j.addma.2017.06.009 ↗
8. Luis E · J Orthop Res Ther · 2018 · 10 · 2575
9. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0017010.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00170 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.06.01810.1016/j.jmapro.2016.06.018 ↗
11. 10.1108/RPJ-08-2012-007210.1108/RPJ-08-2012-0072 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00054-310.1016/S0890-6955(03)00054-3 ↗
13. 15. ISO10993-12, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 12: Sample Preparation and Reference Materials. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization, 2007.
14. 10.1021/nn103104g10.1021/nn103104g ↗
15. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.07.02510.1016/j.sna.2017.07.025 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.04910.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.049 ↗
17. 10.1002/pi.461910.1002/pi.4619 ↗
18. Woo CS · World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Mech Mechatr Eng · 2013 · 7 · 1
19. Barabadi A. · A case study. Int J Eng · 2012 · 8 · 497
20. 10.1109/24.40658810.1109/24.406588 ↗
21. 23. Rausand M, Hoyland A. System Reliability Theory. Models Statistical Methods and Applications, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley, 2004.
22. 10.1016/j.epsr.2010.11.02210.1016/j.epsr.2010.11.022 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00276-003-0182-210.1007/s00276-003-0182-2 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10278-015-9810-810.1007/s10278-015-9810-8 ↗
25. 10.1371/journal.pone.017854010.1371/journal.pone.0178540 ↗
26. 10.1080/10408436.2018.154997710.1080/10408436.2018.1549977 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00170-017-0972-z10.1007/s00170-017-0972-z ↗
28. 10.1007/s00170-011-3742-310.1007/s00170-011-3742-3 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.05710.1016/j.measurement.2015.02.057 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.04410.1016/j.matdes.2014.09.044 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0045-7906(00)00064-110.1016/S0045-7906(00)00064-1 ↗
32. 10.1002/pi.551610.1002/pi.5516 ↗
33. 10.1088/0960-1317/24/3/03501710.1088/0960-1317/24/3/035017 ↗
34. 10.1002/jor.2057310.1002/jor.20573 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.00910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.08.009 ↗
36. 10.1007/s10544-008-9256-610.1007/s10544-008-9256-6 ↗
37. Wang Z · J Appl Polym Sci · 2014 · 131
38. 10.1021/ma034355p10.1021/ma034355p ↗
39. 10.3139/978344643340310.3139/9783446433403 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.mee.2010.12.10810.1016/j.mee.2010.12.108 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.00610.1016/j.jdent.2011.04.006 ↗
42. Tsai YT · J Chin Soc Mech Eng · 2015 · 36 · 439
43. 10.1016/j.epsr.2013.03.01010.1016/j.epsr.2013.03.010 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.00110.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.05.001 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.02.01410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.02.014 ↗