Additive Manufacturing Along Principal Stress Lines
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Optimization techniques developed for additive manufacturing (AM) to maximize the structural stiffness of printed parts are often computationally expensive reformulations of classical procedures that do not typically consider the mechanical behavior introduced to the printed part by the AM fabrication process, which is layer-based, and result in pieces with significant anisotropy. The misalignment of filament orientation and structural action negates the potential benefits of optimization. Addressing this problem, this article presents a two-part research approach exploring a new method of material deposition called Stress Line Additive Manufacturing (SLAM), which deposits filament along paths derived from principal stress lines. The proposed method unifies the design and optimization of the geometry and filament layout of AM-produced parts, and is compatible to the operational characteristics of fused deposition modeling (FDM). Experimentally validating the structural significance of oriented filament, the first part of the research implements SLAM on a commercial platform for planar design cases. Ongoing research to adapt SLAM for complex 2.5D surface geometries using a six-axis industrial robot arm and a custom-designed heated extruder is then presented in Implementation 2: Robot-Enabled SLAM for 2.5-D Cases. The presented research opens new possibilities for structurally performative fabrication.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. Christensen C. The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. JPIM, 2006; 23:39–55.
2. Hopkinson N Hague R Dickens P eds. Rapid manufacturing: An industrial revolution for the digital age. Chichester England: John Wiley & Sons 2006.10.1002/0470033991 ↗
3. Schmidt G, , Druehl C. When is a disruptive innovation disruptive?. JPIM, 2008; 25:347–369.
4. Brackett D Ashcroft I Hague R. Topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Proceedings of the Freeform Fabrication (SFF) Symposium. Austin TX: SFF 2011; pp.348–362.
5. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.633.13510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.633.135 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.01710.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.017 ↗
7. Ventola CL. Medical applications for 3D printing: Current and projected uses. PT, 2014; 39:704–711.
8. Chen Y Li Y. Beam Structure Optimization for additive manufacturing based on principal stress lines. Proceedings of the 21st Solid Freeform Fabrication (SFF) Symposium. Austin TX: SFF 2011; pp.666–678.
9. 10.1016/j.cad.2016.07.00510.1016/j.cad.2016.07.005 ↗
10. Mueller CT, , Irani A, , Jenett BE. Additive manufacturing of structural prototypes for conceptual design. Proceedings of the 55th International Association of Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium: Shells, Membranes and Spatial Structures. Brasilia, BRA: IASS, 2014.
11. Bagsik A, , Schoeppner V, , Klemp E. FDM part quality manufactured with Ultem*9085. 14th International Scientific Conference on Polymeric Materials, 2010, Halle (Saale), Germany.
12. 10.1108/1355254011039554710.1108/13552540110395547 ↗
13. 10.1108/1355254021044116610.1108/13552540210441166 ↗
14. Ziemian C Sharma M Ziemian S. Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling. In: Gokcek M (Ed). Mechanical Engineering. InTech Rijeka HRV 2012; pp.59–180.10.5772/34233 ↗
15. D'Amico A, , Debaie A, , Peterson AM. Effect of layer thickness on irreversible thermal expansion and interlayer strength in fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyping J, 2017; 5:23.
16. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.12910.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.129 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60135-610.1016/S1644-9665(12)60135-6 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.00110.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.001 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
20. 10.1108/1355254081086202810.1108/13552540810862028 ↗
21. 10.20898/j.iass.2016.190.85610.20898/j.iass.2016.190.856 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-3-319-26378-6_2810.1007/978-3-319-26378-6_28 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.01510.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.015 ↗
24. Bablani M, , Bagchi A. Quantification of errors in rapid prototyping processes,and determination of preferred orientation of parts. Transactions of the 23rd North American Manufacturing Research Conference (NAMRC). Houghton, MI: NAMRC SME, 2015; pp.319–324.
25. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.633.14810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.633.148 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.rcim.2012.07.00110.1016/j.rcim.2012.07.001 ↗
27. Han W, , Jafari MA, , Seyed K. Process speeding up via deposition planning in fused deposition-based layered manufacturing processes. Addit Manuf, 2003; 9:212–218.
28. Fonseca J. The loadpath-a way to understand the quality of structures. J (IASS), 1997; 38:129–135.
29. Michalatos P Kaijima S. Eigenshells: Structural patterns on modal forms. In: Shell Structures for Architecture: Form Finding and Optimization. Routledge New York City NY 2014; pp.195–210.
30. 10.1080/1478644040946322910.1080/14786440409463229 ↗
31. Hemp WS. Optimum Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1973 p.71.
32. 10.1016/0045-7825(83)90113-510.1016/0045-7825(83)90113-5 ↗
33. Boresi AP Schmidt RJ Sidebottom OM. Advanced Mechanics of Materials. Wiley New York City NY 2013.
34. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.819.710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.819.7 ↗
35. Burns SA. Recent Advances in Optimal Structural Design. Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers Reston VA 2002.
36. Gibson I Rosen DW Stucker B. Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing. New York: Springer Science & Business Media 2010.10.1007/978-1-4419-1120-9 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.03210.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.032 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.15310.1016/j.phpro.2013.03.153 ↗
39. Krauss H Eschey C Zaeh MF. Thermography for monitoring the selective laser melting process. Proceedings of the 23rd annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium. Austin TX: The University of Texas at Austin 2012.
40. Robert McNeel & Associates. Rhinoceros. www.rhino3d.com (accessed September1 2016).
41. Rutten D. Back home. In I eat bugs for breakfast. https://ieatbugsforbreakfast.wordpress.com/2013/11/10/back-home/ (accessed September1 2016).
42. Preisinger C. Karamba 3D. www.karamba3d.com/ (accessed September1 2016).
43. Flöry S Schmiedhofer H Reis M. Rechenraum – Overview. www.rechenraum.com/en/goat/overview.html (accessed September1 2016).
44. MIT License. NLopt–AbInito. http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/NLopt (accessed September1 2016).
45. Tam K-MM, , Mueller CT. Stress line generation for structurally performative architectural design. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA): Computational Ecologies: Design in the Anthropocene. Cincinnati, OH. New York City, NY: Blurb, Incorporated, 2016; pp.95–109.
46. Halpern AB, , Billington DP, , Adriaenssens S. The ribbed floor slab systems of Pier Luigi Nervi. Proceedings of the 54th International Association of Shell and Spatial Structures (IASS) Symposium: Future Visions. Wroclaw, PL: Wroclaw University of Technology: IASS, 2013.
47. 10.1007/s00158-010-0559-x10.1007/s00158-010-0559-x ↗
48. 10.1115/1.300509710.1115/1.3005097 ↗
49. Achtziger W. Topology optimization of discrete structures: An introduction in view of computational and nonsmooth aspects. In: Topology Optimization in Structural Mechanics. Springer Vienna, Wien, AUT; pp.57–100.
50. 10.4324/978131584927010.4324/9781315849270 ↗
51. Stratasys. Dimension 1200es 3D modeling printers | Stratasys. www.stratasys.com/3d-printers/design-series/dimension-1200es (accessed September1 2016).
52. KUKA. KUKA industrial robots – KR 6 R900 sixx (KR AGILUS). www.kuka-robotics.com/usa/en/products/industrial_robots/small_robots/kr6_r900_sixx (accessed September1 2016).
53. Signstek. Signstek 3D Reprap printer CNC 40 mm Nema17 1.7A 3.4 V 3400 g.cm 2 phase resistance 4 leads electric stepper motor fan motor control. www.amazon.com/Signstek-Printer-3400g-cm-Resistance-Electric/dp/B00H96G5M0/ (accessed September1 2016).
54. Arduino. Arduino–ArduinoBoardUno. www.arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoBoardUno (accessed September1 2016).
55. SparkFun Schmalz B. EasyDriver – Stepper motor driver. www.sparkfun.com/products/12779 (accessed September1 2016).
56. RobotMaster. Robotmaster CAD/CAM for robots (off-line programming). www.robotmaster.com/en (accessed September1 2016).
57. Mastercam. Mastercam CAD/CAM Software > Home. www.mastercam.com/en-us (accessed September1 2016).
58. 10.1002/ad.156910.1002/ad.1569 ↗
59. MakerBot. MakerBot 3D printers | MakerBot. www.makerbot.com/products/3d-printers (accessed September1 2016).
60. Jacot BP, , Caitlin TM. A strain tensor method for three-dimensional Michell structures. Struct Multidisc Optim, 2016; 54:1–11.
61. Huang YJ, , Zhang JY, , Hu X, , Song GX, , Liu ZY, , Yu L, et al. FrameFab: Robotic fabrication of frame shapes. J ACM Transact Graph, 2016; 35:224.