Mechanical Properties of Direct Waste Printing of Polylactic Acid with Universal Pellets Extruder: Comparison to Fused Filament Fabrication on Open-Source Desktop Three-Dimensional Printers
Source abstract
Abstract
Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is the most common and widespread additive manufacturing (AM) technique, but it requires the formation of filament. Fused granular fabrication (FGF), where plastic granules are directly three-dimensional (3D) printed, has become a promising technique for the AM technology. FGF could be a key driver to promote further greening of distributed recycling thanks to the reduced melt solidification steps and elimination of the filament extruder system. However, only large-scale FGF systems have been tested for technical and economic viability of recycling plastic materials. The objective of this work is to evaluate the performance of the FFF and FGF techniques in terms of technical and economical dimensions at the desktop 3D printing scale. Recycled and virgin polylactic acid material was studied by using five different types of recycling feedstocks: commercial filament, pellets, distributed filament, distributed pellets, and shredded waste. The results showed that the mechanical properties from the FGF technique using same configurations showed no statistical differences to FFF samples. Nevertheless, the granulometry could have an influence on the reproducibility of the samples, which explains that the critical factor in this technology is to assure the material input in the feeding system. In addition, FGF costs per kg of material were reduced to less than 1 €/kg compared with more than 20 €/kg for commercial recycled filament. These results are encouraging to foster FGF printer diffusion among heavy users of 3D printers because of reducing the cost associated to the filament fabrication while ensuring the technical quality. This indicates the possibility of a new type of 3D printing recycled plastic waste that is more likely to drive a circular economy and distributed recycling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ERPI, Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA.
Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Bicket M Guilcher S Hestin M et al. Scoping study to identify potential circular economy actions priority sectors material flows and value chains. Publications Office of the European Union. 2014. Available from https://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/scoping-study.pdf (last accessed October13 2019).
2. Raynaud J. Valuing plastics: The business case for measuring managing and disclosing plastic use in the consumer goods industry. UNEP. 2014. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/9238 (last accessed November1 2019).
3. 10.1126/sciadv.170078210.1126/sciadv.1700782 ↗
4. 10.1016/0921-3449(96)01105-610.1016/0921-3449(96)01105-6 ↗
5. Themelis N Castaldi M Bhatti J et al. Energy and economic value of non recycled plastics (NRP) and municipal solid wastes (MSW) that are currently landfilled in the fifty states. Earth Engineering Center Columbia University New York. 2011.
6. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.00210.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.002 ↗
7. Gwamuri J, , Wittbrodt BT, , Anzalone NC, et al. Reversing the trend of large scale and centralization in manufacturing: The case of distributed manufacturing of customizable 3-D-printable self-adjustable glasses. Chall Sustain, 2014; 2:30–40.
8. 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.11.00510.1016/j.bushor.2014.11.005 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00170-015-7970-910.1007/s00170-015-7970-9 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00170-015-7871-y10.1007/s00170-015-7871-y ↗
11. 10.1021/sc400093k10.1021/sc400093k ↗
12. 10.1557/opl.2013.31910.1557/opl.2013.319 ↗
13. 10.1108/1355254131130297810.1108/13552541311302978 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.01310.1016/j.addma.2017.05.013 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.00910.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.009 ↗
16. 10.3390/recycling202001010.3390/recycling2020010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.25710.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.257 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.02310.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.023 ↗
19. Sells E Bailard S Smith Z et al. RepRap: The replicating rapid prototyper: Maximizing customizability by breeding the means of production. In: Piller FT Tseng MM (eds.) Handbook of Research in Mass Customization and Personalization (In 2 volumes). Singapore Singapore: World Scientific 2010; pp. 568–580.10.1142/9789814280280_0028 ↗
20. 10.1017/S026357471000069X10.1017/S026357471000069X ↗
21. 10.1089/3dp.2013.000310.1089/3dp.2013.0003 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.10114410.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101144 ↗
23. Cruz Sanchez FA Lanza S Boudaoud H et al. Polymer recycling and additive manufacturing in an open source context: Optimization of processes and methods. In: Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium ISSF 2015. Austin TX: University of Texas at Austin 2015; pp. 1591–1600.
24. 10.3390/ma1108141310.3390/ma11081413 ↗
25. 10.1089/3dp.2016.005410.1089/3dp.2016.0054 ↗
26. Pakkanen J Manfredi D Minetola P et al. About the use of recycled or biodegradable filaments for sustainability of 3D printing. In: International Conference on Sustainable Design and Manufacturing. Cham Switzerland: Springer 2017; pp. 776–785.10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_73 ↗
27. Tanney D Meisel NA Moore J. Investigating material degradation through the recycling of PLA in additively manufactured parts. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Austin TX 2017; pp. 519–531.
28. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.13910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.139 ↗
29. 10.1007/s00170-015-7300-210.1007/s00170-015-7300-2 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00170-018-1843-y10.1007/s00170-018-1843-y ↗
31. 10.1002/app.4514710.1002/app.45147 ↗
32. 10.1007/s40430-018-1068-x10.1007/s40430-018-1068-x ↗
33. 10.1089/3dp.2015.002910.1089/3dp.2015.0029 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.00610.1016/j.addma.2019.03.006 ↗
35. 10.3390/ma1210164210.3390/ma12101642 ↗
36. Horne R. Reprap development and further adventures in DIY 3D printing: No more filament?—Quest for a Universal Pellet Extruder for 3D Printing. 2014. Available from: https://richrap.blogspot.com/2014/12/no-more-filament-quest-for-universal.html (last accessed July3 2019).
37. upe3D. Universal Pellet Extruder. Available from: http://upe3d.blogspot.com/ (last accessed July3 2019).
38. Canessa E, , Baruzzo M, , Fonda C. Study of moineau-based pumps for the volumetric extrusion of pellets. Addit Manuf, 2017; 17:143–150.
39. Mahormuniz. Pellet Extruder v3—MAHOR·XYZ. Available from: https://mahorxyz.wordpress.com/2016/05/02/pellet-extruder/ (last accessed July3 2019).
40. FormFutura. ReForm. Available from: https://www.formfutura.com/shop/product/reform-rpla-off-black-975 (last accessed May29 2019).
41. Cruz Sanchez FA. Methodological proposition to evaluate polymer recycling in open-source additive manufacturing contexts (doctoral dissertation). Nancy and Metz France: Université de Lorraine; 2016.10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.013 ↗
42. Noztek. Noztek Xcalibur. Available from: https://www.noztek.com/product/noztek-xcalibur/ (last accessed July10 2019).
43. Filastruder. Filawinder. Available from: https://www.filastruder.com/products/filawinder (last accessed August2 2019).
44. Image J. Image processing and analysis in Java. Available from: https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/ (last accessed May3 2019).
45. 10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.03010.1016/j.procir.2019.02.030 ↗
46. Mercuri R Meredith K. An educational venture into 3D Printing. In: 2014 IEEE integrated stem education conference. Austin TX: University of Texas at Austin 2014; pp. 1–6.10.1109/ISECon.2014.6891037 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.27510.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.275 ↗
48. Creality. Creality CR 10s pro. Available from: https://www.creality3dofficial.com/products/official-creality-cr-10s-pro-3d-printer (last accessed July3 2019).
49. Farnworth E. Universal pellet extruder V3 ZQ version. Available from: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:3032188 (last accessed August2 2019).
50. 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.00910.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.009 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.02910.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.029 ↗
52. MCL. Smart power plug. Available from: http://www.mclsamar.com/mcl_images/supports/dom-ps512/support_dom-ps512.html (last accessed July 11 2019).
53. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.03810.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.038 ↗
54. 10.3390/polym1003031310.3390/polym10030313 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.addma.2015.09.00610.1016/j.addma.2015.09.006 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.00510.1016/j.addma.2017.03.005 ↗
57. FNAC. Reprap prusa i3 DIY 3D. Available from: https://www.fnac.com/mp38519066/Reprap-Prusa-i3-DIY-3D-Imprimante-Kits-110-240V-avec-8-GB-SD-Carte-Nozzle-Acrylique-Encadrement-2004LCD-Ecran-220-220-240mm-Zone-ABS-PLA-HIP-PP-Wood-Filament/w-4?oref=42500e08-72ea-a48c-0647-4698a28208f3%7B/&%7DOrigin=CMP%7B/_%7DGOOGLE%7B/_%7DM (last accessed August2 2019).
58. Filimprimante3D. Filament recyclé—Filimprimante3D. Available from: https://www.filimprimante3d.fr/87-filament-recycle (last accessed July15 2019).
59. Reprapworld. Natureworks Ingeo 4043D PLA pellets (1 kg) | 3D printing experts | reprapworld.fr. Available from: https://reprapworld.fr/products/filament/pellets/natureworks_ingeo_4043d_pla_pellets_1_kg/ (last accessed July15 2019).
60. Fournisseurseletricite. French energy supplier: Price per kWh of electricity in 2019 (in French). Available from: https://www.fournisseurs-electricite.com/guides/prix/kwh-electricite (last accessed July16 2019).
61. 10.1016/j.ohx.2018.e0002610.1016/j.ohx.2018.e00026 ↗
62. 10.1007/s00170-019-04074-610.1007/s00170-019-04074-6 ↗
63. 10.1007/s40964-019-00088-410.1007/s40964-019-00088-4 ↗
64. 10.1115/1.168837710.1115/1.1688377 ↗