journal article·2017-09-01

H 2 -dependent attachment kinetics and shape evolution in chemical vapor deposition graphene growth

Esteban Meca, Vivek B Shenoy, John Lowengrub

2D Materials· Volume 4· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Experiments on graphene growth through chemical vapor deposition (CVD) involving methane (CH 4 ) and hydrogen (H 2 ) gases reveal a complex shape evolution and a non-monotonic dependence on the partial pressure of H 2 ( {p}_{{H}2} ). To explain these intriguing observations, we develop a microkinetic model for the stepwise decomposition of CH 4 into mobile radicals and consider two possible mechanisms of attachment to graphene crystals: CH radicals to hydrogen-decorated edges of the crystals and C radicals to bare crystal edges. We derive an effective mass flux and an effective kinetic coefficient, both of which depend on {p}_{{H}2} , and incorporate these into a phase field model. The model reproduces both the non-monotonic dependence on {p}_{{H}2} and the characteristic shapes of graphene crystals observed in experiments. At small {p}_{{H}2} , growth is limited by the kinetics of attachment while at large {p}_{{H}2} growth is limited because the effective mass flux is small. We also derive a simple analytical model that captures the non-monotone behavior, enables the two mechanisms of attachment to be distinguished and provides guidelines for CVD growth of defect-free 2D crystals.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · 2D Materials and Applications · Thermal properties of materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of California

Weierstrass Institute

University of Pennsylvania

Funding

Balsells foundation · Einstein Foundation Berlin · US National Science Foundation

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Edwards · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 3810.1039/C2NR32629A ↗
2. Geim · Nature · 2013 · 499 · 41910.1038/nature12385 ↗
3. Butler · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 289810.1021/nn400280c ↗
4. Fiori · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 76810.1038/nnano.2014.207 ↗
5. Yazyev · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 9 · 75510.1038/nnano.2014.166 ↗
6. Li · Science · 2009 · 324 · 131210.1126/science.1171245 ↗
7. Novoselov · Nature · 2012 · 490 · 19210.1038/nature11458 ↗
8. Zhang · Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 836310.1039/c3nr01599h ↗
9. Vlassiouk · ACS Nano · 2011 · 5 · 606910.1021/nn201978y ↗
10. Klaver · Carbon · 2015 · 82 · 53810.1016/j.carbon.2014.11.005 ↗
11. Safron · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2014 · 2 · 74410.1039/C3TC31738B ↗
12. Choubak · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 2153210.1021/jp5070215 ↗
13. Kim · New J. Phys. · 2013 · 1510.1088/1367-2630/15/5/053012 ↗
14. Gajewski · J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 13510.1063/1.3624524 ↗
15. Zhang · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1778210.1021/jp2006827 ↗
16. Li · Carbon · 2014 · 74 · 25510.1016/j.carbon.2014.03.030 ↗
17. Pierre-Louis · Phys. Rev. E · 2003 · 6810.1103/PhysRevE.68.021604 ↗
18. Meca · Phys. Rev. E · 2013 · 8810.1103/PhysRevE.88.052409 ↗
19. Meca · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 569210.1021/nl4033928 ↗
20. Artyukhov · Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. · 2012 · 109 · 1513610.1073/pnas.1207519109 ↗
21. Torabi · Proc. R. Soc. A · 2009 · 465 · 133710.1098/rspa.2008.0385 ↗