Multiscale investigation of deformation mechanisms and microstructural evolution in deep drawing of AA5052 thin-walled box-shaped parts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Li CF, Liu DH, Yu HP, Ji ZB. Research on formability of 5052 aluminum alloy sheet in a quasi-static-dynamic tensile process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2009;49:117–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.10.006.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.10.006 ↗
2. Deng HK, Mao YF, Li GY, Cui JJ. A study of electromagnetic free forming in AA5052 using digital image correlation method and FE analysis. J Manuf Process. 2019;37:595–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.033.10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.12.033 ↗
3. He HM, Yang T, Ren Y, Peng Y, Xue S, Zheng LX. Experimental investigation on the formability of Al-Mg alloy 5052 sheet by tensile and cupping test. Materials Basel. 2022;15:8949. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15248949.10.3390/ma15248949 ↗
4. Kim SH, Kim SH, Huh H. Design modification in a multi-stage rectangular cup drawing process with a large aspect ratio by an elasto-plastic finite element analysis. J Mater Process Technol. 2001;113:766–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00659-8.10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00659-8 ↗
5. E D, Mizuno T, Li Z. Stress analysis of rectangular cup drawing. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;205:469–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.274.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.274 ↗
6. Yao H, Kinsey BL, Cao J. Rapid design of corner restraining force in deep drawn rectangular parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2000;40:113–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00052-8.10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00052-8 ↗
7. Attar HR, Li N, Foster A. A new design guideline development strategy for aluminium alloy corners formed through cold and hot stamping processes. Mater Des. 2021;207:109856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109856.10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109856 ↗
8. Demirci Hİ, Esner C, Yasar M. Effect of the blank holder force on drawing of aluminum alloy square cup: theoretical and experimental investigation. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;206:152–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.010.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.010 ↗
9. Lin ZQ, Wang WR, Chen GL. A new strategy to optimize variable blank holder force towards improving the forming limits of aluminum sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol. 2007;183:339–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.027.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.027 ↗
10. Kitayama S, Koyama H, Kawamoto K, Miyasaka T, Yamamichi K, Noda T. Optimization of blank shape and segmented variable blank holder force trajectories in deep drawing using sequential approximate optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2017;91:1809–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9877-5.10.1007/s00170-016-9877-5 ↗
11. Huang HH, Sang HJ, Li L, Wang Y, Zhu LB, Liu ZF. High-accuracy control of variable blank holding force driven by electromagnetics based on pulse width modulation with grading voltage and mode matching. J Mater Process Technol. 2023;322:118210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.118210.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2023.118210 ↗
12. Gavas M, Izciler M. Effect of blank holder gap on deep drawing of square cups. Mater Des. 2007;28:1641–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.03.024.10.1016/j.matdes.2006.03.024 ↗
13. Hosseini A, Kadkhodayan M. A hybrid NN-FE approach to adjust blank holder gap over punch stroke in deep drawing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2014;71:337–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5479-7.10.1007/s00170-013-5479-7 ↗
14. Hill R. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci. 1948;193:281–97. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1948.0045.10.1098/rspa.1948.0045 ↗
15. Pham QT, Kim YS. Identification of the plastic deformation characteristics of AL5052-O sheet based on the non-associated flow rule. Met Mater Int. 2017;23:254–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-017-6378-5.10.1007/s12540-017-6378-5 ↗
16. Yang JC, Li H, Bian TJ, Guo XX, Zhang YH, Huang D, et al. Relationship among joined tubular material properties, joining behavior and performance by elastomeric swaging. Thin-Walled Struct. 2021;162:107561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107561.10.1016/j.tws.2021.107561 ↗
17. Barlat F, Brem JC, Yoon JW, Chung K, Dick RE, Lege DJ, et al. Plane stress yield function for aluminum alloy sheets—Part 1: theory. Int J Plast. 2003;19:1297–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0.10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00019-0 ↗
18. Raj A, Verma RK, Singh PK, Shamshoddin S, Biswas P, Narasimhan K. Experimental and numerical investigation of differential hardening of cold rolled steel sheet under non-proportional loading using biaxial tensile test. Int J Plast. 2022;154:103297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103297.10.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103297 ↗
19. Cheng ZN, Zhang CS, Wang MK, Wang YH, Su F, Chen L, et al. Forming limit analysis of AA5052 sheet under bilinear strain path by designing a novel large-scale gripping fixture. J Mater Res Technol. 2023;22:2425–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.120.10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.120 ↗
20. Mohammed AR, Abdalhussien ES. Prediction of the spring back of AA5052 under a variety of parameters through the use of artificial neural network and finite element analysis. Adv Sci Technol Res J. 2025;19:367–81. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/209707.10.12913/22998624/209707 ↗
21. Belhassen L, Koubaa S, Wali M, Dammak F. Numerical prediction of springback and ductile damage in rubber-pad forming process of aluminum sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci. 2016;117:218–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.08.015.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.08.015 ↗
22. Wu BX, Wang HH, Yoshimura A, Taylor T, Liu N, Yanagimoto J. Analysis of rectangular cup drawing considering anisotropic hardening and cyclic effect for orthogonal anisotropic materials. Mech Mater. 2021;158:103874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103874.10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103874 ↗
23. Narayanasamy R, Ravindran R, Manonmani K, Satheesh J. A crystallographic texture perspective formability investigation of aluminium 5052 alloy sheets at various annealing temperatures. Mater Des. 2009;30:1804–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2008.09.011.10.1016/j.matdes.2008.09.011 ↗
24. Kim KJ, Jeong HT, Shin KS, Kim CW. Texture evolution of rolled AA5052 alloy sheets after annealing. J Mater Process Technol. 2007;187–188:578–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.214.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.214 ↗
25. Liu DH, Yu HP, Li CF. Comparative study of the microstructure of 5052 aluminum alloy sheets under quasi-static and high-velocity tension. Mater Sci Eng A. 2012;551:280–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.018.10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.018 ↗
26. Godec M, Zaefferer S, Kraner J, Donik Č, Paulin I. Influence of symmetric and asymmetric rolling on texture evolution of work-hardened AA 5xxx aluminium alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2025;35:30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(24)66663-X.10.1016/S1003-6326(24)66663-X ↗
27. Zhao GH, Sun MX, Li J, Li HY, Ma LF, Li YG. Study on quasi-in-situ tensile microstructure evolution law of 5052-O aluminum alloy based on EBSD. Mater Today Commun. 2022;33:104572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104572.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104572 ↗
28. Zong SW, You XJ, Yang J, Dan CY, Jin L, Shi QW, et al. The correlation of slip transmission/blockage with the fracture in Al-Mg alloy. Scr Mater. 2023;230:115402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115402.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115402 ↗
29. Savoie J, Zhou Y, Jonas JJ, Macewen SR. Textures induced by tension and deep drawing in aluminum sheets. Acta Mater. 1996;44:587–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/1359-6454(95)00214-6.10.1016/1359-6454(95)00214-6 ↗
30. Dassault Systèmes. ABAQUS 6.11 analysis user’s manual, volume III. Dassault Systèmes; 2011.
31. Zein H, Irfan OM. Optimization and mapping of the deep drawing force considering friction combination. Appl Sci Basel. 2021;11:9235. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11199235.10.3390/app11199235 ↗
32. Fang JX, Mo JH, Li JJ. Microstructure difference of 5052 aluminum alloys under conventional drawing and electromagnetic pulse assisted incremental drawing. Mater Charact. 2017;129:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2017.04.035.10.1016/j.matchar.2017.04.035 ↗
33. Peng YC, Xie ZH, Su CC, Zhong YF, Tao ZS, Zhuang DY, et al. Inhomogeneous microstructure evolution of 6061 aluminum alloy at high rotating speed submerged friction stir processing. Materials Basel. 2023;16:579. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020579.10.3390/ma16020579 ↗
34. Kocks UF, Mecking H. Physics and phenomenology of strain hardening: the FCC case. Prog Mater Sci. 2003;48:171–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(02)00003-8.10.1016/S0079-6425(02)00003-8 ↗