journal article·2021

3D printed polycaprolactone/beta-tricalcium phosphate/magnesium peroxide oxygen releasing scaffold enhances osteogenesis and implanted BMSCs survival in repairing the large bone defect

Ziyue Peng, Chengqiang Wang, Chun Liu, Haixia Xu, Yihan Wang, Yang Liu, Yunteng Hu, Jianjun Li, Yanglei Jin, Cong Jiang, Liangle Liu, Jiasong Guo, Lixin Zhu

Journal of Materials Chemistry B· Volume 9· Issue 28
Publisher page

Abstract

Ischemia and hypoxia in the bone defect area remain an intractable problem when treating large bone defects. Thus, oxygen-releasing biomaterials have been widely researched in recent years. Magnesium peroxide (MgO2) can release oxygen (O2), and magnesium ions (Mg2+), simultaneously, which is seen to have significant potential in bone substitutes. In this study, we used 3D printing technology to fabricate a MgO2-contained composite scaffold, which was composed of polycaprolactone (PCL), beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and magnesium peroxide (MgO2). Physical properties and O2/Mg2+ releasing behavior of the scaffold were studied. Then, we evaluated the effects of the scaffold on cell survival, proliferation, migration, adhesion and osteogenic differentiation by the co-culture of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and scaffold under normoxia and hypoxia in vitro. Finally, the osteogenic properties of the scaffold in vivo were evaluated via the rat femoral condylar bone defect model. The PCL/β-TCP/MgO2 scaffold showed good mechanical properties and sustained O2 and Mg2+ release for about three weeks. Meanwhile, the scaffold showed appreciable promotion on the survival, proliferation, migration and osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs under hypoxia compared with control groups. The results of imaging studies and histological analysis showed that implantation of PCL/β-TCP/MgO2 scaffold could promote seed cell survival and significantly increased new bone formation. In sum, the PCL/β-TCP/MgO2 scaffold is promising with great potential for treating large bone defects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Spinal Surgery

Orthopedic Medical Center

Zhujiang Hospital

Southern Medical University

Guangzhou 510280

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

Wenzhou 325200

China

Department of Histology and Embryology

Guangzhou 510515

Key Laboratory of Tissue Construction and Detection of Guangdong Province

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang · Bioact. Mater. · 2017 · 2 · 22410.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007 ↗
2. Leiblein · Materials · 2020 · 13 · 3510.3390/ma13112629 ↗
3. Tatara · Tissue Eng., Part A · 2015 · 21 · 152010.1089/ten.tea.2014.0426 ↗
4. Pneumaticos · J. Cell. Mol. Med. · 2010 · 14 · 256110.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01062.x ↗
5. Kim · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2017 · 6 · 345
6. Long · Biomaterials · 2014 · 35 · 275210.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.039 ↗
7. Sha · Life Sci. · 2017 · 189 · 5210.1016/j.lfs.2017.09.017 ↗
8. Grounds · Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. · 2018 · 45 · 39010.1111/1440-1681.12899 ↗
9. Ashammakhi · Biomacromolecules · 2020 · 21 · 5610.1021/acs.biomac.9b00546 ↗
10. Mallepally · Int. J. Pharm. · 2014 · 475 · 13010.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.08.052 ↗
11. Fan · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 137110.1038/s41598-018-19906-w ↗
12. Nejati · Colloids Surf., B · 2020 · 196 · 11134710.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111347 ↗
13. Lu · Biofabrication · 2019 · 11 · 04501210.1088/1758-5090/ab332a ↗
14. Daneshmandi · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2020 · 108 · 104510.1002/jbm.a.36879 ↗
15. Touri · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2018 · 84 · 23610.1016/j.msec.2017.11.037 ↗
16. Hu · Adv. Sci. · 2020 · 8 · 200049410.1002/advs.202000494 ↗
17. Alayash · Biomolecules · 2017 · 7 · 22510.3390/biom7010002 ↗
18. Liu · Scanning · 2018 · 2018 · 9216314
19. Wetteland · Acta Biomater. · 2016 · 35 · 34110.1016/j.actbio.2016.02.032 ↗
20. Wu · Acta Biomater. · 2015 · 27 · 29410.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.042 ↗
21. Paul · J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. · 2007 · 18 · 699
22. Yuan · Acta Biomater. · 2019 · 85 · 29410.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.017 ↗
23. Ashammakhi · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2019 · 8 · e180104810.1002/adhm.201801048 ↗
24. Liu · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2020 · 148 · 15310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.109 ↗
25. Zhang · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B · 2020 · 108 · 109710.1002/jbm.b.34461 ↗
26. Horch · Int. J. Oral Surg. · 2006 · 35 · 70810.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.017 ↗
27. Ogose · Biomaterials · 2006 · 27 · 154210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.034 ↗
28. Kawai · J. Orthop. Res. · 2018 · 36 · 100210.1002/jor.23673 ↗
29. Liu · Connect. Tissue Res. · 2019 · 60 · 24010.1080/03008207.2018.1487413 ↗
30. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2018 · 93 · 44510.1016/j.msec.2018.07.079 ↗
31. Dong · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1826610.1038/srep18266 ↗
32. Santos-Coquillat · Macromol. Biosci. · 2019 · 19 · e190017910.1002/mabi.201900179 ↗
33. van Ladesteijn · Med. Eng. Phys. · 2018 · 53 · 7510.1016/j.medengphy.2018.01.005 ↗
34. Yazdimamaghani · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2017 · 71 · 125310.1016/j.msec.2016.11.027 ↗
35. Hickey · Acta Biomater. · 2015 · 14 · 17510.1016/j.actbio.2014.12.004 ↗
36. Yeo · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A · 2008 · 84 · 20810.1002/jbm.a.31454 ↗
37. Erdem · Adv. Healthcare Mater. · 2020 · 9 · e190179410.1002/adhm.201901794 ↗
38. Lee · Biomaterials · 2015 · 53 · 58310.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.117 ↗
39. Wong · Biomaterials · 2013 · 34 · 701610.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.062 ↗
40. Xu · Acta Biomater. · 2020 · 101 · 62410.1016/j.actbio.2019.10.018 ↗
41. Yang · Connect. Tissue Res. · 2019 · 60 · 58310.1080/03008207.2019.1611792 ↗