In vivo assessment of grafted cortical neural progenitor cells and host response to functionalized self-assembling peptide hydrogels and the implications for tissue repair
Source abstract
Abstract
Tissue specific scaffolds formed from minimalist N-fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl self-assembling peptides (Fmoc-SAPs) have emerged as promising biomaterials due to their ease of synthesis and capacity to self-assemble via simple, non-covalent interactions into complex nanofibrous hydrogels. However, concerns remain over their biocompatibility and cytotoxicity for in vivo applications. Here, we demonstrate that these Fmoc-SAPs are biocompatible in vivo and well suited as a delivery vehicle for cell transplantation. In order to determine the effect of tissue specific parameters, we designed three Fmoc-SAPs containing varying bioactive peptide sequences derived from extracellular matrix proteins, laminin and fibronectin. Fmoc-SAPs delivering cortical neural progenitor cells into the mouse brain display a limited foreign body response, effective functionalization and low cytotoxicity for at least 28 days. These results highlight the suitability of Fmoc-SAPs for improved neural tissue repair through the support of grafted cells and adjacent host parenchyma. Overall, we illustrate that Fmoc-SAPs are easily engineered materials for use as a tool in cell transplantation, where biocompatibility is key to promoting cell survival, enhancing the graft-host interface and attenuation of the inflammatory response for improved tissue repair outcomes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials · RNA Interference and Gene Delivery · Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research School of Engineering
The Australian National University
Canberra, Australia
Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health
The University of Melbourne
Parkville, Australia
Centre for Chemistry and Biotechnology
Deakin University
Waurn Ponds, Australia
School of Aerospace
Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering
Funding
National Health and Medical Research Council
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Bjorklund · Novartis Found. Symp. · 2000 · 231 · 710.1002/0470870834.ch2 ↗
2. Parish · J. Mol. Cell Biol. · 2014 · 6 · 5410.1093/jmcb/mjt045 ↗
3. Lindvall · J. Clin. Invest. · 2010 · 120 · 2910.1172/JCI40543 ↗
4. Dunnett · Neurobiol. Dis. · 2014 · 61 · 7910.1016/j.nbd.2013.05.004 ↗
5. Lindvall · Stroke · 2011 · 42 · 236910.1161/STROKEAHA.110.599654 ↗
6. Pettikiriarachchi · Aust. J. Chem. · 2010 · 63 · 114310.1071/CH10159 ↗
7. D. R. Nisbet , J. A.Bourne and J. S.Forsythe, in Biomaterials Developments and Applications, ed. H. Bourg and A. Lisle, NOVA Publishers, 2010, pp. 453–463
8. Nisbet · Biomaterials · 2009 · 30 · 457310.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.05.011 ↗
9. Wang · Biomaterials · 2012 · 33 · 918810.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.013 ↗
10. Timpl · BioEssays · 1996 · 18 · 12310.1002/bies.950180208 ↗
11. Nisbet · Biointerphases · 2012 · 7 · 210.1007/s13758-011-0002-x ↗
12. Rodriguez · Soft Matter · 2013 · 9 · 391510.1039/c3sm27758e ↗
13. Tysseling-Mattiace · J. Neurosci. · 2008 · 28 · 381410.1523/JNEUROSCI.0143-08.2008 ↗
14. Holmes · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2000 · 97 · 672810.1073/pnas.97.12.6728 ↗
15. Orbach · Biomacromolecules · 2009 · 10 · 264610.1021/bm900584m ↗
16. Williams · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2008 · 4 · 1910.1038/nnano.2008.378 ↗
17. Smith · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 3710.1002/adma.200701221 ↗
18. Xu · Nanoscale · 2010 · 2 · 96010.1039/b9nr00233b ↗
19. Tang · Langmuir · 2009 · 25 · 944710.1021/la900653q ↗
20. Zhou · Biomaterials · 2009 · 30 · 252310.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.010 ↗
21. Cheng · Soft Matter · 2011 · 7 · 132601333
22. Jayawarna · Acta Biomater. · 2009 · 5 · 93410.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.006 ↗
23. Adams · Soft Matter · 2010 · 6 · 197110.1039/b921863g ↗
24. Modepalli · Pept. Sci. · 2014 · 102 · 19710.1002/bip.22469 ↗
25. Reichardt · Annu. Rev. Neurosci. · 1991 · 14 · 53110.1146/annurev.ne.14.030191.002531 ↗
26. Bye · Exp. Neurol. · 2012 · 236 · 5810.1016/j.expneurol.2012.04.002 ↗
27. Kelly · Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Proteins Proteomics · 2005 · 1751 · 11910.1016/j.bbapap.2005.06.005 ↗
28. Hirst · Nat. Chem. · 2010 · 2 · 108910.1038/nchem.861 ↗
29. Tysseling · J. Neurosci. Res. · 2010 · 88 · 316110.1002/jnr.22472 ↗
30. Ryan · Polym. Chem. · 2012 · 3 · 1810.1039/C1PY00335F ↗
31. Winkler · Trends Neurosci. · 2005 · 28 · 8610.1016/j.tins.2004.12.006 ↗
32. Rolls · Nat. Rev. Neurosci. · 2009 · 10 · 23510.1038/nrn2591 ↗
33. Lau · J. Neurochem. · 2014 · 130 · 21510.1111/jnc.12702 ↗
34. Burda · Neuron · 2014 · 81 · 22910.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.034 ↗
35. Crompton · J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. · 2006 · 17 · 633
36. Maurois · Biomed. Pharmacother. · 2008 · 62 · 25910.1016/j.biopha.2007.10.014 ↗
37. Burch · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 1991 · 88 · 35510.1073/pnas.88.2.355 ↗