Biocompatible, degradable thermoplastic polyurethane based on polycaprolactone-block-polytetrahydrofuran-block-polycaprolactone copolymers for soft tissue engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
Biodegradable synthetic polymers have been widely used as tissue engineering scaffold materials. Even though they have shown excellent biocompatibility, they have failed to resemble the low stiffness and high elasticity of soft tissues because of the presence of massive rigid ester bonds. Herein, we synthesized a new thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer (CTC-PU(BET)) using poly ester ether triblock copolymer (polycaprolactone-block-polytetrahydrofuran-block-polycaprolactone triblock copolymer, PCTC) as the soft segment, aliphatic diisocyanate (hexamethylene diisocyanate, HDI) as the hard segment, and degradable diol (bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate, BET) as the chain extender. PCTC inhibited crystallization and reduced the melting temperature of CTC-PU(BET), and BET dramatically enhanced the thermal decomposition and hydrolytic degradation rate when compared with conventional polyester-based biodegradable TPUs. The CTC-PU(BET) synthesized in this study possessed a low tensile modulus and tensile strength of 2.2 MPa and 1.3 MPa, respectively, and an elongation-at-break over 700%. Meanwhile, it maintained a 95.3% recovery rate and 90% resilience over ten cycles of loading and unloading. In addition, the TPU could be electrospun into both random and aligned fibrous scaffolds consisting of major microfibers and nanobranches. 3T3 fibroblast cell culture confirmed that these scaffolds outperformed the conventional biodegradable TPU scaffolds in terms of substrate-cellular interactions and cell proliferation. Considering the advantages of this TPU, such as ease of synthesis, low cost, low stiffness, high elasticity, controllable degradation rate, ease of processability, and excellent biocompatibility, it has great prospects to be used as a tissue engineering scaffold material for soft tissue regeneration.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Madison
USA
Department of Industrial Equipment and Control Engineering
South China University of Technology
Guangzhou
China
Wisconsin Institute for Discovery
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Funding
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. Diez-Pascual · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2016 · 4 · 60010.1039/C5TB01861G ↗
2. Wu · Nat. Med. · 2012 · 18 · 114810.1038/nm.2821 ↗
3. Jing · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 695510.1021/acsami.5b00900 ↗
4. Place · Chem. Soc. Rev. · 2009 · 38 · 113910.1039/b811392k ↗
5. Kim · Biomaterials · 2015 · 50 · 7510.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.054 ↗
6. Lee · Soft Matter · 2015 · 11 · 764810.1039/C5SM01909E ↗
7. Chiono · Prog. Neurobiol. · 2015 · 131 · 8710.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.06.001 ↗
8. Folliguet · J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · 2001 · 121 · 51010.1067/mtc.2001.112528 ↗
9. Serrano · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2010 · 20 · 19210.1002/adfm.200901040 ↗
10. Lin · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2016 · 4 · 669410.1039/C6TB01501H ↗
11. Wu · Biomaterials · 2016 · 87 · 1810.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.010 ↗
12. Mi · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2015 · 103 · 59310.1002/jbm.a.35208 ↗
13. Zhang · Acta Biomater. · 2016 · 41 · 26410.1016/j.actbio.2016.05.034 ↗
14. Guan · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 396110.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.018 ↗
15. Karchin · Acta Biomater. · 2011 · 7 · 327710.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.017 ↗
16. Kavlock · Acta Biomater. · 2007 · 3 · 47510.1016/j.actbio.2007.02.001 ↗
17. Punnakitikashem · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 461810.1016/j.actbio.2014.07.031 ↗
18. Hong · Biomacromolecules · 2012 · 13 · 368610.1021/bm301158j ↗
19. Baudis · J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. · 2012 · 50 · 127210.1002/pola.25887 ↗
20. Tatai · Biomaterials · 2007 · 28 · 540710.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.035 ↗
21. Zhang · J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part B · 2006 · 79B · 33510.1002/jbm.b.30547 ↗
22. Heijkants · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 421910.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.005 ↗
23. Guan · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 61 · 49310.1002/jbm.10204 ↗
24. Fang · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 463910.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.008 ↗
25. Blakney · ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. · 2016 · 2 · 159510.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00346 ↗
26. Chen · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 2827310.1021/acsami.5b10829 ↗
27. Ou · RSC Adv. · 2016 · 6 · 4713810.1039/C6RA03064E ↗
28. Dey · Biomaterials · 2008 · 29 · 463710.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.020 ↗
29. Trinca · Mater. Sci. Eng., C · 2015 · 56 · 51110.1016/j.msec.2015.07.018 ↗
30. Henry · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2007 · 82A · 66910.1002/jbm.a.31094 ↗
31. Henry · Acta Biomater. · 2009 · 5 · 2910.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.020 ↗
32. John · React. Funct. Polym. · 2013 · 73 · 121310.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.06.004 ↗
33. Guan · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 8510.1016/S0142-9612(03)00476-9 ↗
34. Discher · Science · 2005 · 310 · 113910.1126/science.1116995 ↗
35. Breuls · Open Orthop. J. · 2008 · 2 · 10310.2174/1874325000802010103 ↗
36. Agache · Arch. Dermatol. Res. · 1980 · 269 · 22110.1007/BF00406415 ↗
37. Liu · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2012 · 37 · 71510.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.11.001 ↗
38. Loh · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2015 · 3 · 764110.1039/C5TB01048A ↗
39. Gosline · Philos. Trans. R. Soc., B · 2002 · 357 · 12110.1098/rstb.2001.1022 ↗
40. Nair · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2013 · 101 · 187610.1002/jbm.a.34490 ↗
41. Chan-Chan · Acta Biomater. · 2010 · 6 · 203510.1016/j.actbio.2009.12.010 ↗
42. Guelcher · Acta Biomater. · 2005 · 1 · 47110.1016/j.actbio.2005.02.007 ↗
43. Zhang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 1149010.1039/c4ta01640h ↗
44. Li · Polymer · 2012 · 53 · 24810.1016/j.polymer.2011.11.008 ↗
45. Mi · J. Mater. Res. · 2013 · 28 · 233910.1557/jmr.2013.115 ↗
46. Bergmeister · Acta Biomater. · 2015 · 11 · 10410.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.003 ↗
47. Kim · Biomaterials · 2015 · 40 · 5110.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.017 ↗
48. Mason · Acta Biomater. · 2013 · 9 · 463510.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.007 ↗
49. Caracciolo · J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. · 2009 · 20 · 145
50. Middleton · Biomaterials · 2000 · 21 · 233510.1016/S0142-9612(00)00101-0 ↗
51. Yang · Tissue Eng. · 2001 · 7 · 67910.1089/107632701753337645 ↗
52. Webb · Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. · 2004 · 4 · 80110.1517/14712598.4.6.801 ↗
53. S. Ramakrishna , Z. M.Huang, G. V.Kumar, A. W.Batchelor and J.Mayer, An introduction to biocomposites, Imperial College Press, London, 200410.1142/p311 ↗
54. Seal · Mater. Sci. Eng., R · 2001 · 34 · 14710.1016/S0927-796X(01)00035-3 ↗
55. Engelberg · Biomaterials · 1991 · 12 · 29210.1016/0142-9612(91)90037-B ↗
56. Cohn · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 229710.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.052 ↗
57. Lee · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 2003 · 66A · 2910.1002/jbm.a.10497 ↗
58. Lv · Nature · 2010 · 465 · 6910.1038/nature09024 ↗
59. Guo · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 142710.1002/adma.201304140 ↗
60. V. Labhasetwar , J. K.Vasir and M. K.Reddy, Nitric oxide synthase nanoparticles for treatment of vascular disease, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, US, 2016
61. Nair · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2007 · 32 · 76210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017 ↗
62. McKee · Polymer · 2005 · 46 · 201110.1016/j.polymer.2005.01.028 ↗
63. Jing · Carbohydr. Polym. · 2015 · 117 · 94110.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.025 ↗
64. Arima · Biomaterials · 2007 · 28 · 307410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.013 ↗
65. Webb · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. · 1998 · 41 · 42210.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980905)41:3<422::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
66. Ye · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 2279610.1021/am506998s ↗
67. Fang · Biomacromolecules · 2015 · 16 · 162210.1021/acs.biomac.5b00192 ↗
68. Yi · Prog. Org. Coat. · 2015 · 87 · 16110.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.05.029 ↗