Circulating structural timber and engineered wood products – challenges and potentials towards reliable evaluation of mechanical properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Circulating structural timber and engineered wood products require reliable assessment of key mechanical properties. However, existing standards for strength grading sawn timber are not designed for the reuse and recycling of timber and are unsuitable for this in a number of ways. Furthermore, existing procedures for the re-assessment of structural components are mainly focused on the identification of in-use damage and assumptions about the original mechanical properties, and not on the quantitative re-evaluation of the current mechanical properties. In this paper, existing strength grading procedures in Europe are discussed according to their potential for the assessment of reused timber, with observations on shortcomings of the underlying basis when not applied to new, not previously graded timber. Since the situation for reused and recycled laminated components (glued laminated timber and cross-laminated timber) might be simpler, and perhaps more commercially relevant, a framework will be presented to estimate the mechanical properties of these structural components based on the load history and non-destructive assessment methods. The basis could be expanded by future work to allow the re-grading of sawn timber.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Tree Root and Stability Studies · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aalto University
Graz University of Technology
Edinburgh Napier University
Funding
Ministry of Education and Culture · COST Action HELEN · COST
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3989/mc.2007.v57.i288.6510.3989/mc.2007.v57.i288.65 ↗
2. 10.3390/f1406120210.3390/f14061202 ↗
3. Barrett, J.D., 1996. Duration of load – the past, present and future. In: International COST 508 wood mechanics conference. Stuttgart, Germany.
4. Bather M. 2022. The assessment of the mechanical and physical properties of in situ timber. Doctoral thesis.
5. Bergsagel D. Isaac P. and Koeck A. 2022. Reusing timber in construction feasibility study exploring turning reclaimed timber into structural Glulam. Technical report Circuit Research Paper MS8: Demonstration cases with reused elements or recycled materials in new constructions.
6. Berkmann T. 2024. Wiederverwendung und reparaturfähigkeit von modulen in holzbauweise. Master thesis Graz University of Technology Graz Austria (in German).
7. Bloomberg NEF 2024. “EU ETS market outlook 1H 2024: prices valley before rally”. https://about.bnef.com/blog/eu-ets-market-outlook-1h-2024-prices-valley-before-rally/.
8. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.14467510.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144675 ↗
9. Brandner R. 2012. Stochastic system actions and effects in engineered timber products and structures. Dissertation Graz University of Technology 467 p.
10. Brandner R. and Ottenhaus L.M. 2022. Properties of salvaged structural timber components: How to account for long-term loading effects given unknown load histories? COST Action CA 20139 “Holistic design of taller timber buildings” State-of-the-art report pp 71–75.
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.001 ↗
12. 10.1017/S146604660000280510.1017/S1466046600002805 ↗
13. Chini A.R. Acquaye L. and Rinker M.E. 2001. Grading and mechanical properties of salvaged lumber.
14. Colling F. 1990. Tragfähigkeit von Biegeträgern aus Brettschichtholz in Abhängigkeit von den festigkeitsrelevanten Einflußgrößen. PhD-thesis Versuchsanstalt für Stahl Holz und Steine Universität Fridericiana in Karlsruhe Germany (in German).10.1007/BF02626515 ↗
15. Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2023/2486. European Commission.
16. Crews K. 2007. Development of grading rules for re-cycled timber used in structural applications. International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction Working Commission W18 – Timber Structures CIB-W18/40-5-1 Bled Slovenia.
17. Crews K. Hayward D. and MacKenzie C. 2008. Interim industry standard recycled timber – visually stress graded recycled timber for structural purposes. Forest & Wood Products Australia Project No. PN06.1039 ISBN 978-1-920883-35-5.
18. Crews, K. and MacKenzie, C., 2008. Development of grading rules for re-cycled timber used in structural applications. In: World conference on timber engineering (WCTE). Miyazaki, Japan.
19. Daniels, H.E., 1945. The statistical theory of the strength of bundles of threads. I. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 183, 405–435.
20. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.09.00110.1016/j.resconrec.2004.09.001 ↗
21. de Monte F. 2017. Veredelung von brettsperrholz ausschnitten. Master Thesis Graz University of Technology Graz Austria.
22. Dietsch P. et al. 2021. Merkblatt zur Bewertung von Klebfugen in Brettschichtholzbauteilen im Bestand. Merkblatt Studiengemeinschaft Holzleimbau e.V. https://informationsdienst-holz.de/fileadmin/Publikationen/6_Arbeitshilfen/StgHB_Merkblatt-Klebfugen_2021-08_Auflage-1_210825.pdf.
23. Dietsch P. and Köhler J. 2010. Assessment of timber structures Aachen.
24. DIN 4074-1 2012. Strength grading of wood – Part 1: Coniferous sawn timber. DIN.
25. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11702910.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117029 ↗
26. EN 1194 1999. Timber structures - Glued laminated timber - Strength classes and determination of characteristic values. CEN.
27. EN 13354 2008. Solid wood panels (SWP) – Bonding quality – Test method. CEN.
28. EN 14080 2013. Timber structures – Glued laminated timber and glued solid timber – Requirements. CEN.
29. EN 14081-1 2019. Timber structures – strength graded structural timber with rectangular cross section – Part 1: General requirements. CEN.
30. EN 14081-2 2022. Timber structures. Strength graded structural timber with rectangular cross section. Part 2: Machine grading; additional requirements for type testing. CEN.
31. EN 15497 2014. Structural finger jointed solid timber. Performance requirements and minimum production requirements. CEN.
32. EN 16351 2021. Timber structures – Cross laminated timber – Requirements. CEN.
33. EN 336 2013. Structural timber. Sizes permitted deviations. CEN.
34. EN 338 2016. Structural timber - Strength classes. CEN.
35. EN 384 2022. Structural timber. Determination of characteristic values of mechanical properties and density. CEN.
36. EN 408 2012. Timber structures. Structural timber and glued laminated timber. Determination of some physical and mechanical properties. CEN.
37. ETA-06/0009 2022. Binderholz Brettsperrholz BBS: Solid wood slab element to be used as a structural element in buildings. DIBt.
38. ETA-14/0349 2022. CLT – Cross Laminated Timber: Solid wood slab elements to be used as structural elements in buildings. OIB.
39. European Commission n.d. “Scope of the EU ETS”. https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/scope-eu-ets_en.
40. 10.2908/lc_lci_lev10.2908/lc_lci_lev ↗
41. 10.1007/978-94-007-4056-310.1007/978-94-007-4056-3 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00111-X10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00111-X ↗
43. Falk, R.H., et al., 1995. Recycled lumber and timber. In: Sanayei M (ed.) Restructuring: America and beyond. proceeding of structures congress 13, Boston, MA, New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1, 1065–1068.
44. Falk, R.H., et al., 1999. Effect of damage on the grade yield of recycled lumber. Forest Products Journal, 49 (7/8), 71–79.
45. Falk, R.H., 1999. The properties of lumber and timber recycled from deconstructed buildings. In: Pacific timber engineering conference (PTEC). Rotorua, New Zealand, 14-18 March, Proceedings Vol. 2.
46. Falk, R.H., et al., 2000. Engineering evaluation of 55-year-old timber columns recycled from an industrial military building. Forest Products Journal, 50 (4), 71–76.
47. Falk, R.H., et al., 2003. Effect of drilled holes on the bending strength of large dimension douglas-fir lumber. Forest Products Journal, 53 (5), 55–60.
48. Falk R.H. et al. 2008. Engineering properties of Douglas-fir lumber reclaimed from deconstructed buildings. Research Paper FPL-RP-650 Madison WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory 47 p.10.2737/FPL-RP-650 ↗
49. Falk, R.H., Cramer, S.C., and Evans, J.E., 2013. Framing lumber from building removal: how do we best utilize this untapped structural resource? Forest Products Journal, 62 (7/8), 492–499.
50. Falk R.H. and Green D. 1999. Stress grading of recycled lumber and timber. Structures Congress: Structural Engineering in the 21st Century American Society of Civil Engineers 650–653.
51. Finanzen.net. 2025. “Holzpreis”. https://www.finanzen.net/rohstoffe/holzpreis [Accessed 09 Jan 2025].
52. Fink G. 2014. Influence of varying material properties on the load-bearing capacity of glued laminated timber. PhD Thesis No 21746 ETH Zurich Zurich Switzerland.
53. 10.1007/978-94-007-7811-5_610.1007/978-94-007-7811-5_6 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.01510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.015 ↗
55. Fridley, K.J., et al., 1996a. Effect of 85 years of service of mechanical properties of timber roof members. Part I. Experimental observation. Forest Products Journal, 46 (5), 72–78.
56. Fridley, K.J., et al., 1996b. Effect of 85 years of service of mechanical properties of timber roof members. Part II. Cumulative damage analysis. Forest Products Journal, 46 (6), 85–90.
57. Fridley, K.J., et al., 1998. Effect of 85 years of service of mechanical properties of timber roof members. Part III. Reliability study. Wood and Fiber Science, 30 (1), 72–80.
58. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:4(412)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:4(412) ↗
59. FWPA Standard G01 2024. Recycled timber – visually stress graded for structural purposes. Draft Australia.
60. 10.1257/jep.32.4.5310.1257/jep.32.4.53 ↗
61. Green, D.W., Falk, R.H., and Lantz, S., 2001. Effect of heart checks on flexural properties of reclaimed 6 by 8 Douglas-fir timbers. Forest Products Journal, 51 (7/8), 82–88.
62. Hafner A. Ott S. and Winter S. 2013. Recycling and end-of-life scenarios for timber structures. SB13 Graz Austria.10.1007/978-94-007-7811-5_8 ↗
63. Huuhka S. et al. 2018. Puurakenteiden uudelleenkäyttömahdollisuudet. (Muuttuva rakennettu ympäristö; Nro 4) (Rakennetekniikka. Tutkimusraportti.; Nro 165). Tampere: Tampere University of Technology.
64. Janowiak J.J. Falk R.H. and Kimmel J.D. 2007. Feasibility of producing value-added wood products from reclaimed Hemlock lumber. Unites States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Research paper FPL-RP-645.10.2737/FPL-RP-645 ↗
65. Karacabeyli E. and Soltis L.A. 1991. State-of-the-art report on duration of load research for lumber in North America. In: International Timber Engineering Conference London UK 4 141–155.
66. Köhler J. 2007. Reliability of timber structures. Dissertation Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich Switzerland.
67. Köhler, J., 2014. The proof loading vs. duration of load effects in regard to the reassessment of timber structures. In: WCTE 13th World Conference of Timber Engineering, Quebec, Canada.
68. Kránitz K. 2014. Effect of natural aging on wood. PhD Thesis ETH Zurich No. 21661 Zurich Switzerland.
69. 10.1007/s00226-015-0766-010.1007/s00226-015-0766-0 ↗
70. 10.5194/jsss-11-129-202210.5194/jsss-11-129-2022 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12763510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127635 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13244010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132440 ↗
73. 10.52202/069179-046810.52202/069179-0468 ↗
74. 10.1515/hf-2018-012810.1515/hf-2018-0128 ↗
75. Madsen B. 1992. Structural behaviour of timber. Vancouver Canada: Timber Engineering Ltd. ISBN 0-9696162-0-1.
76. Nakajima S. and Murakami T. 2008. Comparison of two structural reuse options of two-by-four salvaged lumbers. In: SB07 Portugal: Sustainable Construction Materials and Practices: Challenge of the Industry for the New Millenium http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB11699.pdf.
77. Nakajima, S. and Nakagawa, T., 2010. Technologies and environmental benefits to reuse two-by-four salvaged lumbers. In: World conference on timber engineering (WCTE’2010). Riva del Garda, Italy.
78. 10.1007/s00107-024-02170-310.1007/s00107-024-02170-3 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13441810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134418 ↗
80. Obernosterer D. Jeitler G. and Schickhofer G. 2023. Birch for engineered timber products: Part II. WCTE 2023 Oslo Norway.10.52202/069179-0084 ↗
81. 10.1080/17480272.2023.224367310.1080/17480272.2023.2243673 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.11921810.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119218 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.08.08710.1016/j.apsusc.2009.08.087 ↗
84. Potting J. et al. 2017. Circular economy: measuring innovation in the product chain. Report PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
85. prNS 3691 2024. Evaluation of recycled wood. Draft Norway.
86. 10.1007/BF0247369110.1007/BF02473691 ↗
87. Rammer, D.R., 1999. Evaluation of recycled timber members. In: Materials and construction: exploring the connection: proceedings of the fifth ASCE materials engineering congress, May 10-12, 1999, Cincinnati, Ohio. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers p. 46–51.
88. Rammer D.R. and Moura J.M. 2013. Structural evaluation of the second oldest glued-laminated structure in the United States. In: Proceedings 18th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium. Madison WI. Sept. 24-27 2013. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-226. Madison WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory: 269-276.
89. Ranta-Maunus A. and Denzler J. 2009. Variability of strength of European spruce. International council for research and innovation in building and construction working commission W18 – timber structures.
90. Ranta-Maunus A. Denzler J.K. and Stapel P. 2011. Strength of European Timber: Part 2. Properties of spruce and pine tested in Gradewood project. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Working Papers No. 179. https://publications.vtt.fi/pdf/workingpapers/2011/W179.pdf.
91. Ranta-Maunus A. and Turk G. 2010. Approach of dynamic production settings for machine strength grading. World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE 2010) Trentino Italy.
92. Regulation (EU) 2024/3110 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 laying down harmonised rules for the marketing of construction products and repealing Regulation (EU) No 305/2011.
93. 10.52202/069179-010710.52202/069179-0107 ↗
94. 10.1007/s00107-016-1034-110.1007/s00107-016-1034-1 ↗
95. 10.3390/su1011411810.3390/su10114118 ↗
96. Rosowsky, D.V. and Fridley, K.J., 1995. Directions for duration-of-load research. Forest Products Journal, 45 (3), 85–88.
97. 10.23699/p41e-ae4610.23699/p41e-ae46 ↗
98. Scheffer T. and Morrell J. 1998. Natural durability of wood: a worldwide checklist of species. Corvallis Or. College of Forestry Forest Research Laboratory Oregon State University.
99. 10.1139/cjfr-2020-037410.1139/cjfr-2020-0374 ↗
100. 10.3390/f1312204110.3390/f13122041 ↗