Architecture of Ti–6Al–4V thin-walled microthrusters fabricated via laser powder bed fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
Advances in small-satellite platforms have intensified the demand for microthrusters that offer structural robustness under stringent mass constraints. While laser powder bed fusion (PBF-LB/M) enables the realisation of complex geometries, the application of PBF-LB/M to fabricate such devices has posed critical challenges, including dimensional inaccuracies, limited feature resolution, and process-induced defects that can compromise mechanical reliability and propulsion performance. This work addresses these issues by optimising the process to fabricate thin-walled (0.5 T) decomposition chambers and injector orifices as small as 180 µm – the minimum resolvable feature size – achieving significant weight reduction and enhanced precision. Dimensional accuracy measurements showed a maximum deviation of just 4.1% from design specifications, with high relative density (∼99.9%). During 60 s hot-fire tests at 700°C, the microthruster demonstrated stable, repeatable performance without structural degradation. Propulsion efficiencies were also high, with characteristic-velocity and specific-impulse efficiencies reaching 84.3% and 91.7%, respectively. The combination of dimensional accuracy and feature resolution enables reliable propulsion performance, suggesting its applicability for microthruster fabrication at this thrust level and presenting it as a viable alternative to conventional MEMS-based manufacturing approaches. This work proposes the potential of PBF-LB/M as a viable manufacturing route for next-generation, lightweight, high-efficiency micro-propulsion systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)
CetaTech, Inc.
Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials
Tohoku University
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Institute of Civil Military Technology Cooperation · Korea Basic Science Institute
References (91)
Show source-provided references
1. Daehnick C, Gang J, Rozenkopf I. Space launch: are we heading for oversupply or a shortfall. McKinsey Insights. April 17. 2023.
2. 10.4236/ajibm.2022.121008210.4236/ajibm.2022.1210082 ↗
3. 10.1109/MNET.2024.335380610.1109/MNET.2024.3353806 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.03.03210.1016/j.actaastro.2022.03.032 ↗
5. 10.1093/astrogeo/aty23210.1093/astrogeo/aty232 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.10054310.1016/j.gfs.2021.100543 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.01.03210.1016/j.actaastro.2024.01.032 ↗
8. 10.1007/s00170-017-0540-610.1007/s00170-017-0540-6 ↗
9. Tsay M Lafko D Zwahlen J et al. Development of Busek 0.5 N green monopropellant thruster 2013.
10. Tsay M Frongillo J Lafko D et al. Development status and 1U CubeSat application of Busek’s 0.5 N green monopropellant thruster 2014.
11. 10.3390/mi1012081810.3390/mi10120818 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0924-4247(01)00805-610.1016/S0924-4247(01)00805-6 ↗
13. 10.1088/0960-1317/24/10/10400110.1088/0960-1317/24/10/104001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.06.02810.1016/j.sna.2017.06.028 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.sna.2023.11469610.1016/j.sna.2023.114696 ↗
16. 10.1039/D4LC00516C10.1039/D4LC00516C ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.07.05810.1016/j.actaastro.2022.07.058 ↗
18. Berg SP, Rovey J, Prince B, et al. Electrospray of an energetic ionic liquid monopropellant for multi-mode micropropulsion applications. 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propul Conf. 2015:4011.
19. 10.1016/j.sna.2023.11473810.1016/j.sna.2023.114738 ↗
20. 10.1039/C7LC00121E10.1039/C7LC00121E ↗
21. 10.3390/mi1107065810.3390/mi11070658 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.eng.2019.07.00210.1016/j.eng.2019.07.002 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12540-023-01494-810.1007/s12540-023-01494-8 ↗
24. 10.1007/s12540-024-01694-w10.1007/s12540-024-01694-w ↗
25. 10.3390/app11241203610.3390/app112412036 ↗
26. 10.1115/1.403725010.1115/1.4037250 ↗
27. Soller S Beyer S Dahlhaus A et al. Development of liquid rocket engine injectors using additive manufacturing 2015.
28. San Gregorio ML Xie K Wang N et al. 3D Printed molybdenum for grids and keeper electrodes in ion thruster 2018.
29. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10171910.1016/j.addma.2020.101719 ↗
30. 10.1088/1757-899X/576/1/01200210.1088/1757-899X/576/1/012002 ↗
31. Santi M, Dorgnach I, Barato F, et al. Design and testing of a 3D printed 10 N hydrogen peroxide monopropellant thruster. AIAA Propul Energy 2019 Forum. 2019:4277.
32. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.05.02010.1016/j.actaastro.2017.05.020 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11214610.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112146 ↗
34. Fonda-Marsland E, Roberts G, Gibbon D, et al. Development of a low-cost 0.1 N high test peroxide thruster using additive manufacturing. AIAA Propul Energy 2019 Forum. 2019:4227.
35. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10364210.1016/j.addma.2023.103642 ↗
36. 10.1115/1.404738010.1115/1.4047380 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.10.00810.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.10.008 ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.000122910.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001229 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10180110.1016/j.addma.2020.101801 ↗
40. 10.3390/mi1407148010.3390/mi14071480 ↗
41. 10.1038/s41467-018-03734-710.1038/s41467-018-03734-7 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10255110.1016/j.addma.2021.102551 ↗
43. 10.1089/3dp.2021.018010.1089/3dp.2021.0180 ↗
44. Sinico M Witvrouw A Dewulf W. Influence of the particle size distribution on surface quality of maraging 300 parts produced by laser powder bed fusion. Proceedings of the Special Interest Group meeting on Advancing Precision in Additive Manufacturing Euspen; 2019. p. 31–34.
45. 10.3390/ma1416459310.3390/ma14164593 ↗
46. 10.1080/17452759.2020.183034610.1080/17452759.2020.1830346 ↗
47. 10.3390/met1302042410.3390/met13020424 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.msea.2019.13842510.1016/j.msea.2019.138425 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10448410.1016/j.addma.2024.104484 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.asr.2025.02.03210.1016/j.asr.2025.02.032 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.08.01610.1016/j.combustflame.2019.08.016 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.03.03910.1016/j.actaastro.2024.03.039 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.sna.2024.11534710.1016/j.sna.2024.115347 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.actamat.2024.12006010.1016/j.actamat.2024.120060 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.actamat.2024.12039710.1016/j.actamat.2024.120397 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13998110.1016/j.msea.2020.139981 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10087110.1016/j.addma.2019.100871 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10809110.1016/j.matdes.2019.108091 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.11795710.1016/j.powtec.2022.117957 ↗
60. Gordon S McBride BJ. Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Management; … 1994.
61. Huzel DK. Modern engineering for design of liquid-propellant rocket engines AiAA1992.
62. Kim JW, Bhosale VK, Yoon W, et al. Reducing preheating requirements for 1-N-scale thruster with ammonium dinitramide-H2O2 monopropellant. J Propul Power. 2025;41:3.
63. 10.1109/JMEMS.2022.316814710.1109/JMEMS.2022.3168147 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.11214610.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112146 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10214810.1016/j.addma.2021.102148 ↗
66. 10.1007/s00170-012-4271-410.1007/s00170-012-4271-4 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.01.03110.1016/j.jmapro.2025.01.031 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.06.04410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.06.044 ↗
69. 10.3390/ma1421643210.3390/ma14216432 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.msea.2023.14572610.1016/j.msea.2023.145726 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17057510.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170575 ↗
72. 10.3390/met1206098610.3390/met12060986 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.10805610.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108056 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.11543010.1016/j.scriptamat.2023.115430 ↗
75. 10.1115/1.404738010.1115/1.4047380 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.sna.2018.09.04710.1016/j.sna.2018.09.047 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.03610.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.036 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.09.02710.1016/j.actaastro.2016.09.027 ↗
79. Nandyalaa VR Koopmansa R-J Seyidoglua T et al. Vacuum testing of 3D printed 1 N hydrogen peroxide thruster and a novel catalyst International Astronautical Congress 2022.
80. 10.1016/j.ast.2012.02.00210.1016/j.ast.2012.02.002 ↗
81. 10.2514/1.B3741810.2514/1.B37418 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.12.01610.1016/j.actaastro.2020.12.016 ↗
83. Chan Y Liu H Tseng K et al. Preliminary development of a hydrogen peroxide thruster. Proceedings of World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology (WASET) 2013 p. 1221.
84. 10.1016/j.cja.2021.11.02310.1016/j.cja.2021.11.023 ↗
85. 10.1007/s00542-019-04484-210.1007/s00542-019-04484-2 ↗
86. 10.1039/B812737A10.1039/B812737A ↗
87. 10.2514/1.B3428710.2514/1.B34287 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.asr.2021.11.02210.1016/j.asr.2021.11.022 ↗
89. 10.1016/S0924-4247(03)00376-510.1016/S0924-4247(03)00376-5 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.cjche.2017.09.01610.1016/j.cjche.2017.09.016 ↗
91. 10.1109/JMEMS.2012.222692910.1109/JMEMS.2012.2226929 ↗