journal article·2022-04-03Open access

A spiral laser scanning routine for powder bed fusion inspired by natural predator-prey behaviour

Suh In Kim, A. John Hart

Virtual and Physical Prototyping· Volume 17· Issue 2

Abstract

Additive manufacturing by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) requires process parameters that consider both local and global thermal gradients to address material and component quality issues caused by non-uniform heating and cooling. Here, we develop an analogy between natural predator-prey behaviour and heat flow in LPBF, and consequently derive a spiral pattern that is translated into a discrete vector pattern compatible with LPBF. A power optimisation routine is applied to the spiral pattern to maintain constant melt pool depth, and the simulated thermal histories are compared to well-established zig-zag and helix scan patterns. From these results, we propose that the spiral pattern reduces the spatial variation of temperature, while a larger area remains above a specified threshold temperature at the end of the scan. Consequently, the spiral pattern may be promising for printing crack-prone materials, and for parameter optimisation of LPBF overall, and should be experimentally validated in future work.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

Funding

Ford-MIT alliance · MIT-Portugal · Advanced Research Projects-Energy · ARPA-E · MIT Center for Additive and Digital Advanced Production Technologies

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/mrs.2015.23410.1557/mrs.2015.234 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msea.2021.14123710.1016/j.msea.2021.141237 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.03610.1016/j.jtbi.2006.09.036 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41586-019-1857-010.1038/s41586-019-1857-0 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00170-012-3922-910.1007/s00170-012-3922-9 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00158-020-02614-310.1007/s00158-020-02614-3 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80189-410.1016/S0022-5193(89)80189-4 ↗
8. 10.1088/2515-7647/ab708010.1088/2515-7647/ab7080 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.02.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.02.002 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10211610.1016/j.addma.2021.102116 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.05.00710.1016/j.addma.2016.05.007 ↗
12. 10.1038/srep4152710.1038/srep41527 ↗
13. 10.1109/4235.58589210.1109/4235.585892 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10116910.1016/j.addma.2020.101169 ↗
15. 10.2307/108710.2307/1087 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.08.00510.1016/j.jmsy.2019.08.005 ↗
17. 10.2351/1.498325910.2351/1.4983259 ↗
18. Gurney W. S. C. · Ecology · 1998 · 79 · 2516
19. 10.7166/28-3-186210.7166/28-3-1862 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10135410.1016/j.addma.2020.101354 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.07.00810.1016/j.msea.2018.07.008 ↗
22. Hawick K. A. · Complexity International · 2008 · 12 · 1
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.07010.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.070 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.01410.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 ↗
25. 10.1126/science.aay783010.1126/science.aay7830 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.05110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.051 ↗
27. Lotka A. J. · 1925
28. 10.1038/s41467-019-10009-210.1038/s41467-019-10009-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.04.00710.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.04.007 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00170-019-03396-910.1007/s00170-019-03396-9 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.02810.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.028 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.nme.2019.02.03410.1016/j.nme.2019.02.034 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.09.01110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.09.011 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00170-017-1287-910.1007/s00170-017-1287-9 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.02610.1016/j.addma.2018.09.026 ↗
36. 10.1098/rspb.1993.000110.1098/rspb.1993.0001 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.00110.1016/j.addma.2018.05.001 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.04.09910.1016/j.msea.2013.04.099 ↗
39. Ramani K. S. · Preprints · 2021 · 2021100158
40. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.01610.1016/j.addma.2019.05.016 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10218610.1016/j.addma.2021.102186 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.00910.1016/j.addma.2019.05.009 ↗
43. Saunders, M. 2017. “X Marks the Spot-Find Ideal Process Parameters for Your Metal AM Parts.” White Papers Collection-Renishaw plc. Accessed 4 October 2021. https://resources.renishaw.com/en/details/-106810.
44. 10.1016/S0092-8240(05)80008-410.1016/S0092-8240(05)80008-4 ↗
45. 10.1038/118558a010.1038/118558a0 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.06010.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.060 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.03.00210.1016/j.addma.2018.03.002 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10095510.1016/j.addma.2019.100955 ↗
49. 10.1115/1.404364810.1115/1.4043648 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.07.00510.1016/j.mfglet.2020.07.005 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10084410.1016/j.addma.2019.100844 ↗
52. 10.1109/TEMC.2018.288116110.1109/TEMC.2018.2881161 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.09.07810.1016/j.msea.2010.09.078 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10150710.1016/j.addma.2020.101507 ↗