A New In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging Method to Noninvasively Monitor and Quantify the Perfusion Capacity of Three-Dimensional Biomaterials Grown on the Chorioallantoic Membrane of Chick Embryos
Source abstract
Abstract
Adequate vascularization in biomaterials is essential for tissue regeneration and repair. Current models do not allow easy analysis of vascularization of implants in vivo , leaving it a highly desirable goal. A tool that allows monitoring of perfusion capacity of such biomaterials noninvasively in a cheap, efficient, and reliable in vivo model would hence add great benefit to research in this field. We established, for the first time, an in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method to quantify the perfusion capacity of a model biomaterial, DegraPol ® foam scaffold, placed on the embryonic avian chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) in ovo . Perfusion capacity was assessed through changes in the longitudinal relaxation rate before and after injection of a paramagnetic MRI contrast agent, Gd-DOTA (Dotarem ® ; Guerbet S.A.). Relaxation rate changes were compared in three different regions of the scaffold, that is, at the interface to the CAM, in the middle and on the surface of the scaffold ( p <0.05). The highest relaxation rate changes, and hence perfusion capacities, were measured in the interface region where the scaffold was attached to the CAM, whereas the surface of the scaffold showed the lowest relaxation rate changes. A strong positive correlation was obtained between relaxation rate changes and histologically determined vessel density ( R 2 =0.983), which corroborates our MRI findings. As a proof-of-principle, we measured the perfusion capacity in different scaffold materials, silk fibroin either with or without human dental pulp stem cells. For these, three to four times larger perfusion capacities were obtained compared to DegraPol; demonstrating that our method is sensitive to reveal such differences. In summary, we present a novel in vivo method for analyzing the perfusion capacity in three-dimensional-biomaterials grown on the CAM, enabling the determination of the perfusion capacity of a large variety of bioengineered materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silk-based biomaterials and applications · Piezoelectric Actuators and Control · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University Hospital Zurich
ETH and University of Zurich
University of Zurich
University of Zurich and ETH Zurich
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mbs.2009.07.00310.1016/j.mbs.2009.07.003 ↗
2. 10.1089/10763270332206662410.1089/107632703322066624 ↗
3. 10.1002/jbm.b.3265310.1002/jbm.b.32653 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.00910.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.009 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
6. 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)02802-410.1016/S0076-6879(08)02802-4 ↗
7. Cole R.W., , Liu F., , and Herron B.J. Imaging of angiogenesis: past, present and future. In: Méndez-Vilaz A., , and Diaz J., eds. Microscopy: Science, Technology, Applications and Education. Madrid, Spain: FORMATEX, Vol. 1, 2010, pp. 885–896.
8. 10.1002/jbm.1015210.1002/jbm.10152 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mri.2011.07.02210.1016/j.mri.2011.07.022 ↗
10. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.027810.1089/ten.tea.2010.0278 ↗
11. 10.1002/jbm.a.1005910.1002/jbm.a.10059 ↗
12. 10.3390/ijms1308995910.3390/ijms13089959 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.10.012 ↗
14. 10.1089/ten.tec.2008.062610.1089/ten.tec.2008.0626 ↗
15. 10.1002/jbm.b.3137910.1002/jbm.b.31379 ↗
16. 10.1163/15685620074401110.1163/156856200744011 ↗
17. 10.1163/156856299X0077510.1163/156856299X00775 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00122-710.1016/S0142-9612(98)00122-7 ↗
19. 10.1002/term.53810.1002/term.538 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ejpb.2013.02.01110.1016/j.ejpb.2013.02.011 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.04310.1016/j.addr.2012.09.043 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00353-810.1016/S0142-9612(02)00353-8 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-1-61779-815-3_2610.1007/978-1-61779-815-3_26 ↗
24. 10.1007/s00418005042710.1007/s004180050427 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10585-009-9293-410.1007/s10585-009-9293-4 ↗
26. Wang D., , Taylor E.W., , Wang Y., , Wan X., , and Zhang J. Encapsulated nanoepigallocatechin-3-gallate and elemental selenium nanoparticles as paradigms for nanochemoprevention. Int J Nanomed, 7, 1711, 2012.
27. 10.1093/carcin/bgl22910.1093/carcin/bgl229 ↗
28. Ribatti D. Chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane as a useful tool to study angiogenesis. In: Jeon K.W., ed. International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, Vol. 270. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press, Inc., 2008, pp. 181–224.
29. Sukthankar A. DegraPol-btc/btgc: In Vitro Untersuchung der Biokompatibilität für Tenozyten Surgery Division University Hospital Zurich University Hospital Zurich Zurich 1999.
30. 10.1023/A:100895071300110.1023/A:1008950713001 ↗
31. 10.1002/nbm.96110.1002/nbm.961 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ntt.2011.09.00610.1016/j.ntt.2011.09.006 ↗
33. 10.1177/02611929040320060810.1177/026119290403200608 ↗