journal article·2019-03-01Open access

Development and Characterization of a Rabbit Model of Compromised Maxillofacial Wound Healing

Stacey L. Piotrowski, Lindsay Wilson, Neeraja Dharmaraj, Amani Hamze, Ashley Clark, Ramesh Tailor, Lori R. Hill, Stephen Lai, F. Kurtis Kasper, Simon Young

Abstract

Background: Tissue engineering technologies aiming to enhance maxillofacial wound healing are often tested in vivo in preclinical models that do not necessarily reflect the complexity of the clinical need. The aim of this study was to develop a rabbit model of compromised craniofacial wound healing that more accurately mimics clinical scenarios. Materials and Methods: An experimental group of rabbits received fractionated radiation of the mandible totaling 36 Gy. Four weeks after irradiation, both the experimental group and control group ( n = 10/group) underwent a surgical procedure creating a critical size defect in the mandibular bone. Four weeks after surgery, tissue healing was assessed using microcomputed tomography ( μ CT), maximum intensity projection (MIP) scoring, and histopathology. Results: μ CT analysis and MIP scoring showed decreased mineralized tissue in the defect area of irradiated animals compared to the control group. Histopathology showed necrosis in the experimental group. Conclusions: Irradiated animals showed significantly compromised wound healing compared to controls. This preclinical model presents a clinically relevant environment for the investigation of novel wound healing technologies in a compromised critical size bone defect. Impact Statement Maxillofacial defects often present the clinical challenge of a compromised wound bed. Preclinical evaluation of tissue engineering techniques developed to facilitate healing and reconstruction typically involves animal models with ideal wound beds. The healthy wound bed scenario does not fully mimic the complex clinical environment in patients, which can lead to technology failure when translating from preclinical in vivo research to clinical use. The reported preclinical animal model of compromised wound healing enables investigation of tissue engineering technologies in a more clinically relevant scenario, potentially fostering translation of promising results in preclinical research to patients.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments · Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.

Center for Laboratory Animal Medicine and Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.

Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.

Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Division of Surgery, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Spicer P. Young S. Kasper K.F. Athanasiou K.A. Mikos A.G. and Wong M. Tissue Engineering in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. In: Lanza R. Langer R. and Vacantia J. eds. Principles of Tissue Engineering. Oxford UK: Elsevier Inc. 2014 pp. 1487–1506.10.1016/B978-0-12-398358-9.00071-9 ↗
2. 10.1177/002203450935912510.1177/0022034509359125 ↗
3. 10.3389/fphys.2016.0050710.3389/fphys.2016.00507 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.11.02210.1016/j.bjoms.2011.11.022 ↗
5. 10.1089/wound.2016.070710.1089/wound.2016.0707 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tdj.2015.05.00310.1016/j.tdj.2015.05.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-X ↗
8. 10.1155/2017/458540110.1155/2017/4585401 ↗
9. 10.1097/00003086-198604000-0003610.1097/00003086-198604000-00036 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jot.2015.05.00210.1016/j.jot.2015.05.002 ↗
11. 10.3109/03008207.2015.102734110.3109/03008207.2015.1027341 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00492-710.1016/S0142-9612(03)00492-7 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.02610.1016/j.joms.2010.02.026 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.a.3401610.1002/jbm.a.34016 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.03.02510.1016/j.ymeth.2015.03.025 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.03.00210.1016/j.jcms.2016.03.002 ↗
17. 10.1002/jbm.a.3163910.1002/jbm.a.31639 ↗
18. Wilson L.A., , Miller J.J., , Work R.K., , Piotrowski S.L., , Kasper F.K., , Young S., et al. Novel diet regimen for lagomorphs in a compromised oral wound healing study. Abstract presented at the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science National Meeting, Austin, TX, 2017. Abstract no. P182.
19. Wilson L.A., , Miller J.J., , Work R.K., , Piotrowski S.L., , Kasper F.K., , Young S., et al. Novel diet regimen for lagomorphs in a compromised oral wound healing study. Lab Animal Sci Prof, 6, 49, 2017.
20. 10.1038/nprot.2016.12210.1038/nprot.2016.122 ↗
21. 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.051010.1089/ten.tea.2008.0510 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.bone.2008.06.01910.1016/j.bone.2008.06.019 ↗
23. 10.3109/1052029750911703910.3109/10520297509117039 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.12.01610.1016/j.ijom.2011.12.016 ↗
25. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing 2017. www.R-project.org/
26. 10.1055/s-0034-139372410.1055/s-0034-1393724 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.joms.2017.04.01710.1016/j.joms.2017.04.017 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.09.00810.1016/j.oooo.2012.09.008 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.08.01610.1016/j.jcms.2015.08.016 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.01.01510.1016/j.bjps.2010.01.015 ↗
31. 10.1097/00006534-199107000-0000110.1097/00006534-199107000-00001 ↗
32. 10.1111/j.1740-8261.1987.tb01717.x10.1111/j.1740-8261.1987.tb01717.x ↗
33. 10.2307/357892810.2307/3578928 ↗
34. 10.1016/S0167-8140(96)01880-410.1016/S0167-8140(96)01880-4 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jpra.2017.04.00110.1016/j.jpra.2017.04.001 ↗
36. 10.1089/ten.tec.2017.017010.1089/ten.tec.2017.0170 ↗
37. 10.1186/1748-717X-7-16210.1186/1748-717X-7-162 ↗
38. Fondi C., , and Franchi A. Definition of bone necrosis by the pathologist. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab, 4, 21, 2007.
39. 10.1016/0278-2391(83)90294-X10.1016/0278-2391(83)90294-X ↗
40. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.03.01710.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.03.017 ↗
41. 10.4317/medoral.1725710.4317/medoral.17257 ↗
42. 10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-0000910.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00009 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.00510.1016/j.amjmed.2008.12.005 ↗
44. 10.1177/002203451456076810.1177/0022034514560768 ↗
45. 10.1002/jbmr.257710.1002/jbmr.2577 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.bone.2012.04.02010.1016/j.bone.2012.04.020 ↗
47. 10.1001/jama.296.14.173110.1001/jama.296.14.1731 ↗
48. 10.1136/bmj.39048.407928.BE10.1136/bmj.39048.407928.BE ↗
49. 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.00110.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.001 ↗