journal article·2026-08

Resolution of the two-dimensional ferromagnetic spin-3/2 Ising model via cluster growth

J. Roberto Viana, Octavio D. Rodriguez Salmon, Minos A. Neto, Griffith Mendonça, F. Dinóla Neto

Publisher page

Abstract

We propose a computational methodology based on a hierarchical cluster growth process to solve spin-3/2 Ising models efficiently. The method circumvents the exponential complexity (\(4N\)) of the canonical ensemble partition function by iteratively constructing finite magnetic clusters of size \(N_g\), where the effective spin state of a site in generation \(g+1\) is determined by the local magnetization of a cluster from generation \(g\). This approach, which shares conceptual ground with effective field theories, allows the study of systems of effectively very large size \(N = N_0 (N_g)g\). We apply the formalism to the ferromagnetic spin-3/2 Ising model on a honeycomb lattice, modeling the monolayer CrI$_3$, a prototypical two-dimensional Ising magnet. The model, calibrated using the experimental transition temperature (\(Tc \simeq 45\) K), successfully reproduces key experimental features: the temperature dependence of the magnetization \(m(T)\), including its inflection point, and the broadened peak in the specific heat \(c_v(T)\). We also compute the entropy \(s(T)\), finding a finite residual value at low temperatures consistent with the system's double degeneracy. Our results demonstrate that this hierarchical cluster method provides a quantitatively accurate and computationally efficient framework for studying complex magnetic systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Theoretical and Computational Physics · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Onsager · Phys. Rev. · 1944 · 65 · 11710.1103/PhysRev.65.117 ↗
2. Goldenfeld · 1992
3. Wilson · Phys. Rep. · 1974 · 12 · 7510.1016/0370-1573(74)90023-4 ↗
4. Kikuchi · Phys. Rev. · 1951 · 81 · 98810.1103/PhysRev.81.988 ↗
5. Mattis · 1988
6. Ashcroft · 1976
7. Landau · 2000
8. Wolff · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1989 · 62 · 36110.1103/PhysRevLett.62.361 ↗
9. Swendsen · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1987 · 58 · 8610.1103/PhysRevLett.58.86 ↗
10. Computational studies of quantum spin systems10.1063/1.3518900 ↗
11. Schollwöck · Rev. Modern Phys. · 2005 · 77 · 25910.1103/RevModPhys.77.259 ↗
12. Weiss · J. Phys. Theor. Appl. · 1907 · 6 · 66110.1051/jphystap:019070060066100 ↗
13. Shull · Phys. Rev. · 1949 · 76 · 125610.1103/PhysRev.76.1256.2 ↗
14. Mössbauer · Z. Phys. · 1958 · 151 · 12410.1007/BF01344210 ↗
15. Clarke · 2004
16. Lynn · J. Appl. Phys. · 1985 · 57 · 8
17. von Helmolt · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 71 · 233110.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2331 ↗
18. Hubert · 1998
19. Martin · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1987 · 50 · 145510.1063/1.97800 ↗
20. McEwen · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1994 · 129 · 94
21. Coldea · Science · 2010 · 327 · 17710.1126/science.1180085 ↗
22. Huang · Nature · 2017 · 546 · 27010.1038/nature22391 ↗
23. Gong · Nature · 2017 · 546 · 26510.1038/nature22060 ↗
24. Zhang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2020 · 123
25. Gudelli · New J. Phys. · 2019 · 21
26. Augustin · 2021