journal article·2026-05Open access

Influence of annealing temperature and compaction pressure on the magnetic properties of dust cores composed of iron spherical particles and silicone

Yudai Kodama, Saijian Ajia, Sho Muroga, Yasushi Endo

Abstract

This paper reports the influence of the annealing temperatures and compaction pressures on statics and high-frequency magnetic properties of the cores composed of the spherical iron particles and silicone toward utilizing their dust cores as the soft magnetic materials of the reactors and motors of EVs. These properties markedly changed with the increase of annealing temperature. In particular, the real part of complex permeability became high and the core loss became the lowest for the core annealed at the temperature of 500 °C. In contrast, the compaction pressure between 981 and 1962 MPa has little influence on these properties owing to good malleability of the iron. On the basis of these results, it is revealed that the annealing temperature is one of the important dominant factors to improve the magnetic properties of cores composed of the iron particle and silicone. These results also suggest that the optimized annealing temperature may be approximately 500 °C.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Guo · World Electr. Veh. J. · 2023 · 14
2. Shokrollahi · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2007 · 189 · 110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.034 ↗
3. Igarashi · SEI Tech. Rev. · 2015 · 98
4. Guo · Energies · 2023 · 16
5. Cros · IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. · 2004 · 40 · 55010.1109/TIA.2004.824491 ↗
6. Schoppa · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2014 · 5010.1109/TMAG.2013.2290135 ↗
7. Hwang · Materials · 2019 · 12
8. Ahmed · 2022 Int. Conf. Elec. Mach. (ICEM’2022) · 2022 · 551
9. Anhalt · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2008 · 320 · 36610.1016/j.jmmm.2008.02.072 ↗
10. Nguyen · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2021 · 5710.1109/TMAG.2020.3014282 ↗
11. Tan · Mater. Today Commun. · 2025 · 48
12. Sunday · J. Alloys Compd. · 2015 · 653 · 6110.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.260 ↗
13. Wang · J. Alloys Compd. · 2022 · 909
14. Shokrollahi · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 317 · 6110.1016/j.jmmm.2007.04.011 ↗
15. Wu · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 381 · 45110.1016/j.jmmm.2015.01.030 ↗
16. Wang · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 24 · 250010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.168 ↗
17. Choi · Mater · 2022 · 562
18. Wang · Adv. Powder Technol. · 2022 · 33
19. Li · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2019 · 115
20. Shokrollahi · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2006 · 134 · 4110.1016/j.mseb.2006.07.015 ↗
21. Hemmati · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2006 · 305 · 14710.1016/j.jmmm.2005.12.004 ↗
22. Bures · Powder Technol. · 2023 · 42110.1016/j.powtec.2023.118434 ↗
23. Jones · Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A · 2022 · 104310.1016/j.nima.2022.167444 ↗
24. Kodama · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2025 · 61 · 200090510.1109/TMAG.2025.3554753 ↗
25. Bertotti · IEEE Trans Magn. · 1988 · 24 · 62110.1109/20.43994 ↗
26. 2024 · 31 · 81