Atomic-layer stacking dependence of the magnetocrystalline anisotropy in Fe-Co multilayer thin films at MgO(001) interface
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Magnetocrystalline anisotropy (MA) and electric-field-induced modification of the MA energy (E-field-induced MA modification) of Co-Fe multilayer thin films at MgO(001) interface with respect to atomic-layer stacking were investigated using first-principles calculations combined with the cluster expansion method. Although the magnetic quantities have very complicated dependence on atomic-layer stacking, we find that there are key short-range atomic-layer stackings. At the MgO interface, a double atomic-layer stacking of Fe on the MgO enhances an interfacial perpendicular MA while there is no role of the short-range stacking in the E-field-induced MA modification where a single Fe atomic-layer at the interface plays a role. The physical origins underlying these trends were subsequently elucidated by band structure calculations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Kent · Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 69910.1038/nmat2844 ↗
2. Shimabukuro · Physica E · 2010 · 42 · 101410.1016/j.physe.2009.11.110 ↗
3. Ikeda · Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 72110.1038/nmat2804 ↗
4. Koo · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 10310.1063/1.4828658 ↗
5. Dieny · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2017 · 8910.1103/RevModPhys.89.025008 ↗
6. Nakamura · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 220409(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.81.220409 ↗
7. Yang · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84
8. Odkhuuab · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2016 · 414 · 12610.1016/j.jmmm.2016.04.027 ↗
9. Hotta · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 11010.1103/PhysRevLett.110.267206 ↗
10. Kim · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92
11. Mizunuma · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 9510.1063/1.3265740 ↗
12. Yakushiji · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 9710.1063/1.3524230 ↗
13. Daalderop · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 68 · 68210.1103/PhysRevLett.68.682 ↗
14. Shima · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 310 · 221310.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.799 ↗
15. T. Burkert, L. Nordström, O. Eriksson, and O. Heinonen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 027203.10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.027203 ↗
16. Tyson · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · R370210.1103/PhysRevB.54.R3702 ↗
17. P. Kamp, A. Marty, B. Gilles, R. Hoffmann, S. Marchesini, M. Belakhovsky, C. Boeglin, H.A. Dűrr, S.S. Dhesi, G. van der Laan, A. Rogalev, Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 1105.10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1105 ↗
18. T. Kojima, M. Mizuguchi, T. Koganezawa, K. Osaka, M. Kotsugi, K. Takanashi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 51 (2012) 010204.10.7567/JJAP.51.010204 ↗
19. Razee · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 82 · 536910.1103/PhysRevLett.82.5369 ↗
20. Inoue · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17C72010.1063/1.4913898 ↗
21. Mito · Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 9910.1103/PhysRevB.99.174439 ↗
22. Sanchez · Physica A · 1984 · 128 · 33410.1016/0378-4371(84)90096-7 ↗
23. Connolly · Phys. Rev. B · 1983 · 27 · 516910.1103/PhysRevB.27.5169 ↗
24. J.M. Sanchez, Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 224202.10.1103/PhysRevB.81.224202 ↗
25. A. van de Walle, Nat. Mater. 7 (2008) 455.10.1038/nmat2200 ↗
26. Nelson · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 8810.1103/PhysRevB.88.155105 ↗
27. M. Weisheit, S. Fähler, A. Marty, Y. Souche, C. Poinshignon, D. Givord, Science 315 (2007) 349.10.1126/science.1136629 ↗
28. Maruyama · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2009 · 4 · 15810.1038/nnano.2008.406 ↗
29. Wang · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 6410.1038/nmat3171 ↗
30. Odkhuuab · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 3274210.1038/srep32742 ↗
31. Yu · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 43 · 641110.1103/PhysRevB.43.6411 ↗
32. Li · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 43 · 78010.1103/PhysRevB.43.780 ↗
33. Urano · J. Phys, Soc. Jpn. · 1988 · 57 · 340310.1143/JPSJ.57.3403 ↗
34. Wimmer · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 24 · 86410.1103/PhysRevB.24.864 ↗
35. Weinert · Phys. Rev. B · 1982 · 26 · 457110.1103/PhysRevB.26.4571 ↗
36. Nakamura · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67
37. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
38. Weinert · Phys. Rev. B · 1985 · 32 · 211510.1103/PhysRevB.32.2115 ↗
39. Daalderop · Phys. Rev. B · 1990 · 41 · 1191910.1103/PhysRevB.41.11919 ↗
40. Nakamura · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102
41. Weinert · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21
42. Ong · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 020407(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.92.020407 ↗
43. We have carefully checked results for CCCCCC/ but we could not get an agreement in the sign of EMA to that in Ref. 7 even when the in-plane lattice constant was reduced by 6 % where the EMA results in -0.6 meV/unit-area.
44. Pires · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2011 · 323 · 78910.1016/j.jmmm.2010.10.045 ↗
45. Peng · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1817310.1038/srep18173 ↗
46. By settling the in-plane lattice constant to the bulk value of CoFe in FCFCFC/, the positive MA energy of 0.87 meV/unit-area was obtained.
47. Hallal · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 8810.1103/PhysRevB.88.184423 ↗
48. Kikuchi · Phys. Rev. · 1951 · 81 · 98810.1103/PhysRev.81.988 ↗
49. Sanchez · Phys. Rev. B · 1978 · 17 · 292610.1103/PhysRevB.17.2926 ↗
50. EMA(k) in Fig. (c) is averaged for the magnetizations oriented along the <100> and <010> directions.
51. Wang · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 1493210.1103/PhysRevB.47.14932 ↗