journal article·2020-11Open access

Influence of grain boundaries, interface roughness and non-collinear magnetic configurations in the AF layer on the exchange bias properties of F/AF nanodots: A numerical investigation

Haydar Kanso, Renaud Patte, Helena Zapolsky, Denis Ledue

Abstract

Abstract Motivated by the insufficient understanding of the drastic effects of the disordered interfacial phases at the interface in F/AF bilayers on the exchange bias properties, we consider a realistic model for F/AF nanodots which accounts for roughness at the interface, grain boundaries (GB) and magnetic frustration in the AF layer. Then, we investigate the effect of the magnetic disorder at the F/AF interface on the exchange field by means of Monte Carlo simulations. First, using a simplified model based on a perfect crystal structure (without GB) and with an ideal interface, our results indicate that non-collinear ordered magnetic configuration at the F/AF interface (due to frustration) causes a small decrease of the exchange field (about few dozen percent). Including GB in the model, we show that this kind of structural disorder produces disordered magnetic configurations with domains at the F/AF interface. This magnetic disorder does not lead to a decrease of the exchange field compared to the perfect crystal but makes the AF layer more stable. Our study also reveals that adding roughness in the form of a percentage of mixed F and AF moments in the interfacial layer results in a more significant decrease of the exchange field (two orders of magnitude) leading to values which are comparable to experimental values.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Copper Interconnects and Reliability · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Meiklejohn · Phys. Rev. · 1956 · 102 · 141310.1103/PhysRev.102.1413 ↗
2. Noguès · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 192 · 20310.1016/S0304-8853(98)00266-2 ↗
3. Berkowitz · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 200 · 55210.1016/S0304-8853(99)00453-9 ↗
4. Baltz · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2018 · 9010.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005 ↗
5. Prejbeanu · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19
6. Schuhl · Comptes Rendus Physique · 2005 · 6 · 94510.1016/j.crhy.2005.10.010 ↗
7. Parkin · Proc. IEEE · 2003 · 91 · 66110.1109/JPROC.2003.811807 ↗
8. Sousa · Comptes Rendus Physique · 2005 · 6 · 101310.1016/j.crhy.2005.10.007 ↗
9. Cros · Comptes Rendus Physique · 2005 · 6 · 95610.1016/j.crhy.2005.10.002 ↗
10. C. Chappert, A. Fert, F. N. Van Dau, nature materials 6 (2007).10.1038/nmat2024 ↗
11. Dieny · J. Appl. Phys. · 1991 · 69 · 477410.1063/1.348252 ↗
12. Childress · Comptes Rendus Physique · 2005 · 6 · 99710.1016/j.crhy.2005.11.001 ↗
13. Nozières · Reflets Phys. · 2010 · 12
14. Ohldag · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 9110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.017203 ↗
15. Ventura · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 10110.1063/1.2736290 ↗
16. Baltz · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 9610.1063/1.3449123 ↗
17. Baltz · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 8110.1103/PhysRevB.81.052404 ↗
18. Akmaldinov · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 10310.1063/1.4816816 ↗
19. Proenca · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 8710.1103/PhysRevB.87.134404 ↗
20. Spizzo · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 9110.1103/PhysRevB.91.064410 ↗
21. Nascimento · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2008 · 32010.1016/j.jmmm.2008.02.059 ↗
22. Wu · Phys. Rev. B · 2020 · 101
23. Lhoutellier · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 4810.1088/0022-3727/48/11/115001 ↗
24. Lhoutellier · J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 12010.1063/1.4967829 ↗
25. Kanso · Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 9910.1103/PhysRevB.99.054410 ↗
26. Kanso · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 49110.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165543 ↗
27. Billoni · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2011 · 23
28. Stiles · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 372210.1103/PhysRevB.59.3722 ↗
29. Miltényi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 422410.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4224 ↗
30. Nowak · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 6610.1103/PhysRevB.66.014430 ↗
31. Spray · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 39 · 453610.1088/0022-3727/39/21/003 ↗
32. Agudelo-Giraldo · Physica B: Condensed Matter · 2014 · 434 · 14910.1016/j.physb.2013.11.014 ↗
33. Moritz · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 9410.1103/PhysRevB.94.104425 ↗
34. Yüksel · Physics Letters A · 2018 · 382 · 129810.1016/j.physleta.2018.03.009 ↗
35. Camarero · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 9110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.027201 ↗
36. Malozemoff · Phys. Rev. B · 1987 · 35 · 367910.1103/PhysRevB.35.3679 ↗
37. Malozemoff · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 37 · 767310.1103/PhysRevB.37.7673 ↗
38. Malozemoff · J. Appl. Phys. · 1988 · 63 · 387410.1063/1.340591 ↗
39. Usadel · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 8010.1103/PhysRevB.80.014418 ↗
40. Landa · 2008
41. Lavrskyi · Npj Comput. Mater. · 2016
42. Khachaturyan · 1983
43. Kapikranian · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 9210.1103/PhysRevB.92.224106 ↗
44. Mavrikakis · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 174 · 9210.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.021 ↗
45. Sutton · Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A · 1983 · 309 · 1506
46. Coey · 2010
47. Chen · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 324910.1103/PhysRevB.48.3249 ↗
48. E. du Trémolet de Lacheisserie, Magnétisme, Matériaux et Applications 2000 Collection Grenoble Sciences EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France.10.1051/978-2-86883-463-8 ↗
49. Metropolis · J. Chem. Phys. · 1953 · 21 · 108710.1063/1.1699114 ↗
50. Nowak · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 16310.1103/PhysRevLett.84.163 ↗
51. Chubykalo · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 6710.1103/PhysRevB.67.064422 ↗