journal article·2007-03

Effective quantum variational Monte Carlo study of Hubbard model

Takashi Yanagisawa, Izumi Hase, Kunihiko Yamaji

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract It is important to understand the physics of correlated itinerant electron systems characterized by the on-site Coulomb repulsion U . The two-dimensional Hubbard model is one of the simplest models for the description of such correlated systems. The Gutzwiller-projected wave function has been improved by considering effective electron correlation or long-range Jastrow-type correlation. Elaborate extra correlation operators optimize the electron correlation and lower the ground-state energy considerably. The kinetic operator effectively optimizes the Gutzwiller function: ψ λ = e - λ K P G ψ 0 , where K is the kinetic energy term of the Hubbard Hamiltonian and P G is the Gutzwiller operator. The Gutzwiller–Jastrow function is also an well optimized wave function. We have developed a quantum Monte Carlo optimization method for many fermion systems as an intensive extension of effective variational wave function ψ λ . We employ the Hubbard–Stratonovich method to decompose the interactions in terms of auxiliary fields and we use this in an expansion of the true ground-state wave function. The ground-state wave function is written as a linear combination of the basis states for which we diagonalize the Hamiltonian to obtain the lowest energy state.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Quantum and electron transport phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Dagotto · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1994 · 66 · 76310.1103/RevModPhys.66.763 ↗
2. Scalapino · 1990
3. Yamaji · Physica C · 1994 · 222 · 34910.1016/0921-4534(94)90553-3 ↗
4. Yamaji · Physica C · 1994 · 235–240 · 222110.1016/0921-4534(94)92332-9 ↗
5. Koike · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 1999 · 68 · 165710.1143/JPSJ.68.1657 ↗
6. Koike · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 2000 · 69 · 219910.1143/JPSJ.69.2199 ↗
7. Nakanishi · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 1997 · 66 · 29410.1143/JPSJ.66.294 ↗
8. Yamaji · Physica C · 1998 · 304 · 22510.1016/S0921-4534(98)00283-4 ↗
9. Yanagisawa · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 18450910.1103/PhysRevB.64.184509 ↗
10. Yanagisawa · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 2110.1088/0953-8984/14/1/303 ↗
11. Yanagisawa · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 13240810.1103/PhysRevB.67.132408 ↗
12. Yanagisawa · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 2005 · 74 · 83510.1143/JPSJ.74.835 ↗
13. Miyazaki · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 2004 · 73 · 164310.1143/JPSJ.73.1643 ↗
14. Yamaji · J. Superconductivity · 2006 · 18 · 80310.1007/s10948-005-0085-z ↗
15. Anderson · Science · 1998 · 279 · 119610.1126/science.279.5354.1196 ↗
16. Ohtsuka · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 1992 · 61 · 164510.1143/JPSJ.61.1645 ↗
17. Yanagisawa · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 1998 · 67 · 386710.1143/JPSJ.67.3867 ↗