Effective quantum variational Monte Carlo study of Hubbard model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract It is important to understand the physics of correlated itinerant electron systems characterized by the on-site Coulomb repulsion U . The two-dimensional Hubbard model is one of the simplest models for the description of such correlated systems. The Gutzwiller-projected wave function has been improved by considering effective electron correlation or long-range Jastrow-type correlation. Elaborate extra correlation operators optimize the electron correlation and lower the ground-state energy considerably. The kinetic operator effectively optimizes the Gutzwiller function: ψ λ = e - λ K P G ψ 0 , where K is the kinetic energy term of the Hubbard Hamiltonian and P G is the Gutzwiller operator. The Gutzwiller–Jastrow function is also an well optimized wave function. We have developed a quantum Monte Carlo optimization method for many fermion systems as an intensive extension of effective variational wave function ψ λ . We employ the Hubbard–Stratonovich method to decompose the interactions in terms of auxiliary fields and we use this in an expansion of the true ground-state wave function. The ground-state wave function is written as a linear combination of the basis states for which we diagonalize the Hamiltonian to obtain the lowest energy state.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Quantum and electron transport phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Dagotto · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1994 · 66 · 76310.1103/RevModPhys.66.763 ↗
2. Scalapino · 1990
3. Yamaji · Physica C · 1994 · 222 · 34910.1016/0921-4534(94)90553-3 ↗
4. Yamaji · Physica C · 1994 · 235–240 · 222110.1016/0921-4534(94)92332-9 ↗
5. Koike · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 1999 · 68 · 165710.1143/JPSJ.68.1657 ↗
6. Koike · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 2000 · 69 · 219910.1143/JPSJ.69.2199 ↗
7. Nakanishi · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 1997 · 66 · 29410.1143/JPSJ.66.294 ↗
8. Yamaji · Physica C · 1998 · 304 · 22510.1016/S0921-4534(98)00283-4 ↗
9. Yanagisawa · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 18450910.1103/PhysRevB.64.184509 ↗
10. Yanagisawa · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 2110.1088/0953-8984/14/1/303 ↗
11. Yanagisawa · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 13240810.1103/PhysRevB.67.132408 ↗
12. Yanagisawa · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 2005 · 74 · 83510.1143/JPSJ.74.835 ↗
13. Miyazaki · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 2004 · 73 · 164310.1143/JPSJ.73.1643 ↗
14. Yamaji · J. Superconductivity · 2006 · 18 · 80310.1007/s10948-005-0085-z ↗
15. Anderson · Science · 1998 · 279 · 119610.1126/science.279.5354.1196 ↗
16. Ohtsuka · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 1992 · 61 · 164510.1143/JPSJ.61.1645 ↗
17. Yanagisawa · J. Phys. Soc. Japan · 1998 · 67 · 386710.1143/JPSJ.67.3867 ↗