journal article·2013-11Open access

Asymptotic dynamics of a frustrated model with spherical constraint

Alejandro Mendoza-Coto, Rogelio Díaz-Méndez

Abstract

Abstract We solve the Langevin dynamics of a continuum model with a spherical constraint, considering a ferromagnetic exchange and a long-range antiferromagnetic interaction. Analytical results within the Hartree approximation show an equivalence in the form of spatial and auto-correlation functions in the long time regime between this model and the recently studied Ginzburg–Landau frustrated model. The low-temperature behavior is discussed in the context of glassy dynamics. The emergence of interesting features regarding the establishment of the saturated phase is also analyzed in the view of recent literature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Theoretical and Computational Physics · Material Dynamics and Properties · Quantum many-body systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Rosensweig · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 1983 · 39 · 12710.1016/0304-8853(83)90416-X ↗
2. Seul · Physical Review A · 1992 · 46 · 751910.1103/PhysRevA.46.7519 ↗
3. Seul · Science · 1995 · 267 · 47610.1126/science.267.5197.476 ↗
4. Saratz · Physical Review Letters · 2010 · 104 · 07720310.1103/PhysRevLett.104.077203 ↗
5. Gleiser · Physical Review B · 2003 · 68 · 13440110.1103/PhysRevB.68.134401 ↗
6. Díaz-Méndez · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2012 · 324 · 12810.1016/j.jmmm.2011.07.046 ↗
7. Nicolao · Physical Review B · 2007 · 76 · 05445310.1103/PhysRevB.76.054453 ↗
8. Díaz-Méndez · Physical Review B · 2010 · 81 · 18442010.1103/PhysRevB.81.184420 ↗
9. Garel · Physical Review B · 1982 · 26 · 32510.1103/PhysRevB.26.325 ↗
10. Roland · Physical Review B · 1990 · 42 · 665810.1103/PhysRevB.42.6658 ↗
11. Pighín · Physical Review B · 2007 · 75 · 22443310.1103/PhysRevB.75.224433 ↗
12. Mulet · Physical Review B · 2007 · 75 · 06410810.1103/PhysRevB.75.064108 ↗
13. Berlin · Physical Review · 1952 · 86 · 82110.1103/PhysRev.86.821 ↗
14. Baxter · 1982
15. Chamati · Journal of Physics A · 2008 · 41 · 37500210.1088/1751-8113/41/37/375002 ↗
16. Mermin · Physical Review Letters · 1966 · 17 · 113310.1103/PhysRevLett.17.1133 ↗
17. Brody · Physical Review E · 1994 · 49 · 366510.1103/PhysRevE.49.3665 ↗
18. Cannas · Physica A · 2001 · 294 · 36210.1016/S0378-4371(01)00032-2 ↗
19. Grousson · Physical Review E · 2000 · 62 · 778110.1103/PhysRevE.62.7781 ↗
20. Grousson · Physical Review E · 2002 · 66 · 2612610.1103/PhysRevE.66.026126 ↗
21. Chamati · Modern Physics Letters B · 2003 · 17 · 118710.1142/S0217984903006232 ↗
22. Prozorov · Nature Physics · 2008 · 4 · 32710.1038/nphys888 ↗
23. Tarzia · Physical Review Letters · 2006 · 96 · 07570210.1103/PhysRevLett.96.075702 ↗
24. Díaz-Méndez · European Physical Journal B · 2011 · 81 · 30910.1140/epjb/e2011-20185-y ↗
25. Hase · Journal of Physics A · 2006 · 39 · 487510.1088/0305-4470/39/18/007 ↗
26. Tarzia · Physical Review E · 2007 · 75 · 01141010.1103/PhysRevE.75.011410 ↗
27. Godrèche · Journal of Physics A · 2000 · 33 · 914110.1088/0305-4470/33/50/302 ↗
28. Portman · Physical Review B · 2010 · 82 · 18441610.1103/PhysRevB.82.184409 ↗