journal article·2015-12Open access

Anisotropic Friedel oscillations inside the domain wall

R. Ghanbary, A. Phirouznia

Abstract

The influence of the non-collinear magnetic configuration on Friedel is investigated theoretically. Specifically the influence of the magnetic configuration on the induced electric charge in a Néel type domain wall (DW) has been obtained. The well-known Levy and Zhang eigenstates for a linear DW have been employed. Then the dielectric function of this magnetic system has been obtained within the random phase approximation. Results of the current work demonstrated that magnetic configuration of the system manifests itself in the electric properties such as induced charge distribution. Meanwhile the anisotropy of the induced charge distribution in the real space provides a measurable way for the determination of the DW orientation. In addition anisotropy of the dielectric function in k-space arises as a result of the anisotropy of the magnetic configuration. Therefore the orientation of the magnetic DW could also be captured by full optical measurements.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. D.M. Eigler, M.F. Crommie, C.P. Lutz, Nature 363 (1993) 524–527.10.1038/363524a0 ↗
2. Zwerger · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 43 · 643410.1103/PhysRevB.43.6434 ↗
3. Aronov · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1987 · 59 · 75510.1103/RevModPhys.59.755 ↗
4. Kragh · 2002
5. Friedel · Philos. Mag. · 1953 · 43 · 15310.1080/14786440208561086 ↗
6. Ruderman · Phys. Rev. · 1954 · 96 · 9910.1103/PhysRev.96.99 ↗
7. Bruno · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1991 · 67 · 160210.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1602 ↗
8. Horing · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 278510.1103/PhysRevB.54.2785 ↗
9. Wunsch · New J. Phys. · 2006 · 8 · 31810.1088/1367-2630/8/12/318 ↗
10. Pyatkovskiy · J. Phys. · 2009 · 21 · 025506
11. Hwang · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 20541810.1103/PhysRevB.75.205418 ↗
12. Badalyan · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 20531410.1103/PhysRevB.81.205314 ↗
13. Simion · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 04512710.1103/PhysRevB.72.045127 ↗
14. Hofmann · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 79 · 26510.1103/PhysRevLett.79.265 ↗
15. Gregg · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 158010.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1580 ↗
16. Lepadatu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 12720110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.127201 ↗
17. Levy · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 79 · 511010.1103/PhysRevLett.79.5110 ↗
18. Rüdiger · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 563910.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5639 ↗
19. Çetin · Physica Status Solidi B · 2004 · 241 · 241010.1002/pssb.200304870 ↗
20. Tatara · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 377310.1103/PhysRevLett.78.3773 ↗
21. Crommie · Nature · 1993 · 363 · 52410.1038/363524a0 ↗
22. Hasegawa · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 71 · 107110.1103/PhysRevLett.71.1071 ↗
23. Sprunger · Science · 1997 · 275 · 176410.1126/science.275.5307.1764 ↗