Oxygen Plasma Substrate and Specific Nanopattern Promote Early Differentiation of HepaRG Progenitors
Source abstract
Abstract
Fully differentiated HepaRG™ cells are the hepatic cell line of choice for in vitro study in toxicology and drug trials. They are derived from a hepatoblast-like progenitor (HepaRG-P) that differentiates into a coculture of hepatocyte-like and cholangiocyte-like cells. This process that requires 2 weeks of proliferation followed by 2 weeks of differentiation using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) can be time consuming and costly. Identifying a method to accelerate HepaRG-Ps toward a mature lineage would save both time and money. The ability to do this in the absence of DMSO would remove the possibility of confounding toxicology results caused by DMSO induction of CYP pathways. It has been shown that tissue culture substrates play an important role in the development and maturity of a cell line, and this is particularly important for progenitor cells, which retain some form of plasticity. Oxygen plasma treatment is used extensively to modify cell culture substrates. There is also evidence that patterned rather than planar surfaces have a positive effect on proliferation and differentiation. In this study, we compared the effect of standard tissue culture plastic (TCP), oxygen plasma coated (OPC), and nanopatterned substrates (NPS) on early differentiation and function of HepaRG-P cells. Since NPS were OPC we initially compared the effect of TCP and OPC to enable comparison between all three culture surfaces using OPC as control to asses if patterning further enhanced early differentiation and functionality. The results show that HepaRG-P's grown on OPC substrate exhibited earlier differentiation, proliferation, and function compared with TCP. Culturing HepaRG-P's on OPC with the addition of NPS did not confer any additional advantage. In conclusion, OPC surface appeared to enhance hepatic differentiation and functionality and could replace traditional methods of differentiating HepaRG-P cells into fully differentiated and functional HepaRGs earlier than standard methods. Impact statement We show significantly earlier differentiation and function of HepaRG progenitor cells when grown in dimethyl sulfoxide-free medium on oxygen plasma substrates versus standard tissue culture plastic. Further investigation showed that nanopatterning of oxygen plasma substrates did not confer any additional advantage over smooth oxygen plasma, although one pattern (DSQ120) showed comparable early differentiation and function.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Hepatology Laboratory, University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Advanced Therapeutics, The Jack Copland Centre, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Department of Molecular Biophysics, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Division of Biomedical Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Institute for BioEngineering (IBioE), School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.vascn.2010.04.01310.1016/j.vascn.2010.04.013 ↗
2. 10.1111/bcpt.1263110.1111/bcpt.12631 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00204-011-0782-210.1007/s00204-011-0782-2 ↗
4. 10.1371/journal.pone.011768910.1371/journal.pone.0117689 ↗
5. 10.1016/0300-483X(88)90202-810.1016/0300-483X(88)90202-8 ↗
6. Ryan J.A. 2008. Evolution of cell culture surfaces. BioFiles 3 21 Sigma-Aldrich/Merck www.sigmaaldrich.com/technical-documents/articles/biofiles/evolution-of-cell.html (accessed January2019).
7. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.05110.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.11.051 ↗
8. 10.1089/ten.teb.2018.005610.1089/ten.teb.2018.0056 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat201310.1038/nmat2013 ↗
10. 10.1109/TNB.2004.82427610.1109/TNB.2004.824276 ↗
11. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab5d3f10.1088/1758-5090/ab5d3f ↗
12. 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.03.00410.1016/j.bcp.2011.03.004 ↗
13. 10.1124/dmd.109.03183110.1124/dmd.109.031831 ↗
14. 10.1172/JCI6602210.1172/JCI66022 ↗
15. Hine R. and Martin E. (Eds.) 2016. A Dictionary of Biology: Transferrin. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 12 Apr. 2018 from www.oxfordreference.com.ezproxy.is.ed.ac.uk/view/10.1093/acref/978019 8714378.001.0001/acref-9780198714378-e-4498.
16. 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research003410.1186/gb-2002-3-7-research0034 ↗
17. 10.1373/clinchem.2008.11279710.1373/clinchem.2008.112797 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.00210.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.002 ↗
19. National Center for Biotechnology Information SOX9 U.S. National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda MD 20894 USA. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene?Db=gene&Cmd=ShowDetailView&TermToSearch=6662 (accessed March18 2018)
20. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.05.01210.1016/j.ydbio.2015.05.012 ↗
21. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.05110.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.051 ↗
22. 10.1002/ibd.2041310.1002/ibd.20413 ↗
23. 10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.2210.3748/wjg.v20.i1.22 ↗
24. 10.1074/jbc.M111.33459910.1074/jbc.M111.334599 ↗
25. 10.1534/genetics.112.14321410.1534/genetics.112.143214 ↗
26. 10.1074/jbc.M115.69441410.1074/jbc.M115.694414 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.tox.2009.09.01910.1016/j.tox.2009.09.019 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.01810.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.018 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11517-010-0632-z10.1007/s11517-010-0632-z ↗