journal article·2004-10

Effect of submonolayer coverage of Fe and Mn films on the magnetization direction of Ni/Cu(100)

R. Thamankar, S. Bhagwat, F.O. Schumann

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Ni/Cu (1 0 0) films are known to exhibit an “inverse” reorientation transition at 8– 10 ML . In contrast to Fe or Co ultrathin films one observes that the magnetization rotates from in-plane to out-of-plane upon increasing the thickness. The driving force for this phenomenon is the tetragonal distortion of the film which results in a volume uniaxial anisotropy, which favors an out-of-plane orientation of the magnetization. The effect of submonolayer coverage of Fe and Mn on Ni reorientation transition is studied by means of Magneto-Optic Kerr effect (MOKE). Fe overlayers are found to have a marked influence on the interface anisotropy of Ni films resulting in a strong reduction of the critical thickness. In the submonolayer regime, interface anisotropy favors out-of-plane magnetization. Extrapolation to the fully formed interface shows a negative anisotropy. Mn overlayers did not have any dramatic effect on the SRT thickness. Hence do not change significantly the surface anisotropy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Freeman · J. Magn. Magn. Mater · 1991 · 100 · 49710.1016/0304-8853(91)90837-Z ↗
2. Chappert · J. Appl. Phys · 1988 · 64 · 573610.1063/1.342243 ↗
3. Schulz · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1346710.1103/PhysRevB.50.13467 ↗
4. Vollmer · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 627710.1103/PhysRevB.60.6277 ↗
5. Weber · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 52 · R1440010.1103/PhysRevB.52.R14400 ↗
6. Engel · J. Appl. Phys · 1993 · 73 · 619210.1063/1.352694 ↗
7. Thamankar · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 05441110.1103/PhysRevB.69.054411 ↗
8. Nünthel · Surf. Sci · 2003 · 531 · 5310.1016/S0039-6028(03)00438-2 ↗
9. Ney · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 65 · 02441110.1103/PhysRevB.65.024411 ↗
10. Wassermann · 1990 · Vol. 5
11. Lindner · Surf. Sci · 2003 · 523 · L6510.1016/S0039-6028(02)02482-2 ↗
12. Liu · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 10440810.1103/PhysRevB.64.104408 ↗
13. Baberschke · Appl. Phys. A · 1996 · 62 · 41710.1007/BF01567112 ↗
14. Wuttig · Phys. Rev. Lett · 1993 · 70 · 361910.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3619 ↗
15. Wuttig · Surf. Sci · 1993 · 292 · 18910.1016/0039-6028(93)90401-5 ↗
16. Schmitz · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1535210.1103/PhysRevB.54.15352 ↗
17. Wu · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 1713110.1103/PhysRevB.51.17131 ↗
18. Roth · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 52 · R1569110.1103/PhysRevB.52.R15691 ↗
19. O'Brien · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 61710.1103/PhysRevB.51.617 ↗
20. Choi · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 702910.1103/PhysRevB.59.7029 ↗