Novel approaches to high-density perpendicular recording media
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Two different approaches to reduce the intermediate layer (IL) thickness in perpendicular recording media are proposed. Such a reduction in IL thickness could lead to improvement in writability and recording performance. The first approach involved the introduction of a magnetic intermediate layer (MIL), to obtain C -axis growth. Media with CoCr alloy layer as the MIL were studied. Reasonably good C -axis growth with a Δθ 50 of about 3.8° could be obtained for MIL thickness of about 10 nm. Noise could be controlled by introducing exchange-breaking layers. The other approach involved the use of crystalline soft underlayers (SUL) to obtain suitable growth conditions for the recording layers. For this purpose, CoFeTaCr alloys with a FCC(1 1 1) texture were prepared. A good C -axis dispersion in the recording layer with a Δθ 50 of about 3.1° could be obtained for IL thickness of about 5 nm. The present study indicates that the recording medium deposited on crystalline SUL is relatively noisier than that deposited on amorphous SUL. Reducing the noise of the crystalline SUL is a way towards higher areal densities.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Charap · IEEE T. Magn. · 1997 · 3310.1109/20.560142 ↗
2. Abarra · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 258110.1063/1.1319183 ↗
3. Fullerton · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 77 · 380610.1063/1.1329868 ↗
4. Piramanayagam · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 242310.1063/1.1407855 ↗
5. Choe · IEEE T. Magn. · 2002 · 38 · 999910.1109/TMAG.2002.802790 ↗
6. http://www.toshiba.co.jp/about/press/2004_12/pr1401.htm
7. Bertram · IEEE T. Magn. · 2000 · 36 · 410.1109/20.824417 ↗
8. Zheng · IEEE T. Magn. · 2004 · 40 · 249810.1109/TMAG.2004.832167 ↗
9. Ikeda · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 676910.1063/1.1557816 ↗
10. Keitoku · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 287 · 17210.1016/j.jmmm.2004.10.028 ↗
11. Oikawa · IEEE T. Magn. · 2002 · 38 · 197610.1109/TMAG.2002.801791 ↗
12. Bertero · IEEE T. Magn. · 2002 · 38 · 162710.1109/TMAG.2002.1017746 ↗
13. Yamane · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 287 · 15310.1016/j.jmmm.2004.10.025 ↗
14. Velu · IEEE T. Magn. · 2003 · 39 · 66810.1109/TMAG.2003.808991 ↗
15. Uwazumi · IEEE T. Magn. · 2003 · 39 · 191410.1109/TMAG.2003.813778 ↗
16. Choe · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 287 · 15910.1016/j.jmmm.2004.10.026 ↗
17. Khizroev · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 452110.1063/1.1695092 ↗
18. Khizroev · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 246 · 33510.1016/S0304-8853(01)00855-1 ↗
19. DSI Roadmap, Data Storage Institute, 2003.
20. Mukai · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 10N11910.1063/1.1855454 ↗
21. Piramanayagam · IEEE T. Magn. · 2005 · 41 · 319010.1109/TMAG.2005.855280 ↗
22. Shi · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 22250310.1063/1.2137447 ↗
23. Piramanayagam · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 09250110.1063/1.2179112 ↗
24. Chen · 1986
25. MacLaren · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 483310.1063/1.370036 ↗
26. M.J. Liau, S.N. Piramanayagam, J.Z. Shi, B.C. Lim, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., (2006), to appear in the same issue.