An estimation of the magnetic disorder at Fe/Cr interfaces in coupled and non-coupled Fe/Cr multilayers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The antiferromagnetic coupling at the Fe/Cr interfaces, inferred from the orientation of the Cr magnetic moments, is used to estimate the magnetic disorder resulting from the interfacial roughness in Fe/Cr multilayers. A crossover from in-plane to out-of-plane orientation of Cr moments depends on the energy cost in either case: (i) to break the interfacial Fe–Cr antiferromagnetic coupling or (ii) having sites with frustrated Cr–Cr antiferromagnetic coupling in the Cr interlayers. A quantitative model of the magnetic frustration due to interfacial disorder in Fe/Cr multilayer systems is described. The step edge density, or terrace size, required to break the interfacial Fe–Cr coupling and destroy the Fe–Fe interlayer exchange coupling is estimated.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Zabel · J. Phys. Condens. Matter. · 1999 · 11 · 930310.1088/0953-8984/11/48/301 ↗
2. Pierce · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 200 · 29010.1016/S0304-8853(99)00319-4 ↗
3. Fishman · J. Phys. Condens. Matter. · 2001 · 13 · R23510.1088/0953-8984/13/13/201 ↗
4. Shi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 135110.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1351 ↗
5. Berger · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1997 · 165 · 47110.1016/S0304-8853(96)00595-1 ↗
6. Fullerton · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 75 · 33010.1103/PhysRevLett.75.330 ↗
7. Fullerton · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 138210.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1382 ↗
8. Schreyer · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 52 · 1606610.1103/PhysRevB.52.16066 ↗
9. Schmitte · Europhys. Lett. · 1999 · 48 · 69210.1209/epl/i1999-00540-7 ↗
10. Schreyer · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 87 · 544310.1063/1.373367 ↗
11. Stoeffler · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1995 · 147 · 26010.1016/0304-8853(95)00023-2 ↗
12. Stoeffler · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 44 · 1038910.1103/PhysRevB.44.10389 ↗
13. Mibu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 224310.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2243 ↗
14. Almokhtar · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 13440110.1103/PhysRevB.66.134401 ↗
15. Almokhtar · J. Phys. Condens. Matter. · 2000 · 12 · 924710.1088/0953-8984/12/44/307 ↗
16. Jiko · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2004 · 272–276 · 123310.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.070 ↗
17. Almokhtar · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2004 · 272–276 · e81310.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.153 ↗
18. Momida · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2001 · 234 · 12610.1016/S0304-8853(01)00285-2 ↗
19. Arzhnikov · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 02440710.1103/PhysRevB.68.024407 ↗