journal article·2018-11

Playback signal distortion in CPP-GMR read heads due to induced electromagnetic interference

P. Khunkitti, A. Kruesubthaworn, A. Kaewrawang, A. Siritaratiwat

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Electromagnetic interference (EMI) induced magnetic instabilities are an influential factor which can degrade the performance of magnetic read heads. In this paper, we investigate the influences of EMI on the playback response of the current perpendicular-to-the-plane giant magnetoresistance (CPP-GMR) read heads via micromagnetic simulations. The readback signal and the noise spectral density of the heads when subjected to the EMI were characterized. It was found that the readback signal could be significantly distorted, or become inaccurate, from the EMI through the induced spin transfer torque effect. Also, the incorrect readback signal results in a notable expansion of the noise spectral density which further impacts the head stability. Furthermore, the bit-error-rate of the head signal processing could be markedly increased by multiple EMI occurrences. Hence, the playback response distortion of the CPP-GMR read heads due to the EMI is another concerned factor for the read sensors at higher storage capacities.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Nagasaka · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2009 · 321 · 50810.1016/j.jmmm.2008.05.040 ↗
2. Takagishi · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2002 · 38 · 227710.1109/TMAG.2002.802804 ↗
3. Nakatani · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 21250110.1063/1.3432070 ↗
4. Seki · J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 16401010.1088/0022-3727/48/16/164010 ↗
5. Bainsla · J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 12500210.1088/0022-3727/48/12/125002 ↗
6. Hirohata · J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 47 · 19300110.1088/0022-3727/47/19/193001 ↗
7. Slonczewski · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 159 · L110.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 ↗
8. Berger · Phys. Rev. B. · 1996 · 54 · 935310.1103/PhysRevB.54.9353 ↗
9. Zhu · Magn. · 2004 · 40 · 18210.1109/TMAG.2003.821202 ↗
10. A. Wallash and D. Smith, in Proc. EOS/ESD Symp. IEEE (1998) 368-374.
11. Kruesubthaworn · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 07F53810.1063/1.2838738 ↗
12. Khunkitti · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2016 · 412 · 4210.1016/j.jmmm.2016.03.076 ↗
13. Baril · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2002 · 38 · 228310.1109/TMAG.2002.802803 ↗
14. Khunkitti · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17A90810.1063/1.4914963 ↗
15. Khunkitti · IEEE Magn. Lett. · 2016 · 7 · 450550410.1109/LMAG.2016.2595497 ↗
16. T. Mewes, C.K.A. Mewes, Matlab based micromagnetics code M3, 2012 http://magneticslab.ua.edu/micromagnetics-code.html/ (accessed 13 July 2017).
17. Litvinov · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 241 · 45310.1016/S0304-8853(02)00023-9 ↗
18. Childress · Comptes Rendus Phys. · 2005 · 6 · 99710.1016/j.crhy.2005.11.001 ↗
19. IEC 61000-4-2: Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC), Part 4-2: Testing and measurement techniques–Electrostatic discharge immunity test—Basic EMC Publication.
20. Huang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 03391310.1063/1.3619773 ↗
21. Kovintavewat · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2002 · 38 · 234010.1109/TMAG.2002.801899 ↗
22. McMichael · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 10J90110.1063/1.1852191 ↗
23. Wood · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2000 · 36 · 3610.1109/20.824422 ↗