Numerical method for analysis of the correlation between ferrofluid optical transmission and its intrinsic properties
Source abstract
Abstract
A numerical method to simulate the ferrofluid particle distribution evolution is presented. Also, the optical transmission of the distributions obtained is calculated by two numerical methods. The first one consists on a numerical propagation of an electromagnetic wave through the sample. The second one analyzes the aggregates’ mean length to obtain the optical transmission through a mixture law. As an illustration of the possibilities of the method developed, it is applied to analyze how ferrofluid optical transmission changes after magnetic field application depend on intrinsic properties of the colloid such as its nanoparticle concentration and surfactant repulsion represented by means of the final distances between consecutive particles forming chains. Changes in the attenuation factor of these samples show the trends expected from the Literature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Surfactants and Colloidal Systems · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Odenbach · 2002
2. Pu · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 9910.1063/1.2195016 ↗
3. Miao · Opt. Express · 2013 · 21 · 2991410.1364/OE.21.029914 ↗
4. Miao · Opt. Lett. · 2015 · 40 · 390510.1364/OL.40.003905 ↗
5. Brojabasi · Opt. Commun. · 2015 · 342 · 22410.1016/j.optcom.2014.12.073 ↗
6. Rao · Phys. Rev. E · 2005 · 7210.1103/PhysRevE.72.031408 ↗
7. Chen · Opt. Commun. · 2014 · 316 · 14610.1016/j.optcom.2013.11.058 ↗
8. Laskar · Phys. Rev. E · 2008 · 7810.1103/PhysRevE.78.031404 ↗
9. Patel · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2006 · 300 · E21710.1016/j.jmmm.2005.10.088 ↗
10. Zhang · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1996 · 32 · 29710.1109/20.486337 ↗
11. Shulyma · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2016 · 416 · 14110.1016/j.jmmm.2016.04.071 ↗
12. Tasker · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1988 · 24 · 167110.1109/20.11566 ↗
13. Elmore · Phys. Rev. · 1941 · 60 · 59310.1103/PhysRev.60.593 ↗
14. Eloi · Phys. Rev. E · 2010 · 8210.1103/PhysRevE.82.021407 ↗
15. Gregory · Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. · 2009 · 147–148 · 10910.1016/j.cis.2008.09.003 ↗
16. Ivey · Phys. Rev. E · 2000 · 6310.1103/PhysRevE.63.011403 ↗
17. Brojabasi · Opt. Commun. · 2015 · 336 · 27810.1016/j.optcom.2014.09.065 ↗
18. Solovyova · Phys. Rev. E · 2017 · 9610.1103/PhysRevE.96.052609 ↗
19. Hassan · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2017 · 443 · 3610.1016/j.jmmm.2017.07.024 ↗
20. Yardley · Phys. Rev. E · 1999 · 60 · 606810.1103/PhysRevE.60.6068 ↗
21. Lee · J. Opt. Soc. Am. A · 2011 · 28 · 181210.1364/JOSAA.28.001812 ↗
22. Sihvola · IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. · 1988 · 26 · 42010.1109/36.3045 ↗
23. Sanz-Felipe · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2018 · 5110.1088/1361-6463/aab05f ↗
24. Kruse · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 6810.1103/PhysRevB.68.054208 ↗
25. Li · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 37 · 335710.1088/0022-3727/37/24/001 ↗
26. http://www.chembk.com/en/chem/Methyl%20methacrylate.
27. http://www.chembk.com/en/chem/EGDMA.
28. Kedenburg · Opt. Mat. Express · 2012 · 2 · 158810.1364/OME.2.001588 ↗
29. Querry · 1985