NiO-thickness dependent magnetic anisotropies in Fe/NiO/Au(001) and Fe/NiO/MgO(001) systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The in-plane magnetic anisotropy of Fe/NiO bilayers was studied quantitatively as a function of NiO thickness using the magneto-optical Kerr effect with a rotating field. For NiO thicker than the ordering transition thickness, the total in-plane fourfold anisotropy of the Fe layer decreases with NiO thickness in Fe/NiO/Au(001), but increases in Fe/NiO/MgO(001). Our result indicates that the exchange coupling in an Fe/NiO bilayer might induce an additional in-plane fourfold anisotropy, and the opposite thickness dependent behaviors may be attributed to the different Ni2+ antiferromagnetic spin orientations for NiO films grown on Au(001) and MgO(001) surfaces.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · ZnO doping and properties · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Meiklejohn · Physical Review · 1956 · 102 · 141310.1103/PhysRev.102.1413 ↗
2. Nogués · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 1999 · 192 · 20310.1016/S0304-8853(98)00266-2 ↗
3. Carey · Applied Physics Letters · 1992 · 60 · 306010.1063/1.106756 ↗
4. Schulthess · Physical Review Letters · 1998 · 81 · 451610.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4516 ↗
5. Tsang · Journal of Applied Physics · 1982 · 53 · 260510.1063/1.330967 ↗
6. Hoffmann · Physical Review Letters · 2004 · 93 · 09720310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.097203 ↗
7. Gredig · Physical Review B · 2006 · 74 · 09443110.1103/PhysRevB.74.094431 ↗
8. Qiu · Physical Review Letters · 2008 · 101 · 14720710.1103/PhysRevLett.101.147207 ↗
9. Jeffrey · Physical Review B · 2008 · 78 · 09441910.1103/PhysRevB.78.094419 ↗
10. Jiménez · Physical Review B · 2009 · 80 · 01441510.1103/PhysRevB.80.014415 ↗
11. Krivorotov · Physical Review B · 2002 · 65 · 10040210.1103/PhysRevB.65.100402 ↗
12. Pechan · Physical Review B · 2002 · 65 · 06441010.1103/PhysRevB.65.064410 ↗
13. Kuch · Physical Review B · 2002 · 65 · 14040810.1103/PhysRevB.65.140408 ↗
14. Chen · Journal of Applied Physics · 2010 · 108 · 07390510.1063/1.3489985 ↗
15. Alders · Physical Review B · 1998 · 57 · 1162310.1103/PhysRevB.57.11623 ↗
16. Altieri · Physical Review Letters · 2003 · 91 · 13720110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.137201 ↗
17. Kim · Physical Review B · 2010 · 81 · 17441610.1103/PhysRevB.81.174416 ↗
18. Yin · Physical Review Letters · 2006 · 97 · 06720310.1103/PhysRevLett.97.067203 ↗
19. Wu · Physical Review B · 2008 · 78 · 06441310.1103/PhysRevB.78.064413 ↗
20. Luches · Physical Review B · 2010 · 81 · 05443110.1103/PhysRevB.81.054431 ↗
21. Mattheis · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 1999 · 205 · 14310.1016/S0304-8853(99)00526-0 ↗
22. Tian · Physical Review B · 2004 · 70 · 01230110.1103/PhysRevB.70.012301 ↗
23. Xu · Physical Review B · 2008 · 77 · 05240310.1103/PhysRevB.77.052403 ↗
24. Wastlbauer · Advances in Physics · 2005 · 54 · 13710.1080/00018730500112000 ↗
25. Thomas · Physical Review Letters · 2003 · 90 · 01720510.1103/PhysRevLett.90.017205 ↗
26. Chen · Applied Physics Letters · 2011 · 98 · 13250510.1063/1.3572028 ↗
27. Wu · Physical Review B · 2006 · 74 · 21240210.1103/PhysRevB.74.212402 ↗
28. Matsuyama · Physical Review Letters · 2000 · 85 · 64610.1103/PhysRevLett.85.646 ↗
29. Ohldag · Physical Review Letters · 2001 · 86 · 287810.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2878 ↗
30. Stöhr · Physical Review Letters · 1999 · 83 · 186210.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1862 ↗
31. Seok · Physical Review B · 2009 · 80 · 17440710.1103/PhysRevB.80.174407 ↗
32. Wu · Physical Review B · 2002 · 65 · 18441910.1103/PhysRevB.65.184419 ↗
33. Li · Physical Review Letters · 2009 · 102 · 20720610.1103/PhysRevLett.102.207206 ↗
34. Cougo dos Santos · Physical Review B · 2000 · 61 · 131110.1103/PhysRevB.61.1311 ↗
35. Fermin · Journal of Applied Physics · 1998 · 83 · 486910.1063/1.367285 ↗
36. J. Zhu, X. Xiao, G. Chen, Y.Z. Wu, To be published.