journal article·2017-11

Magnetically tunable bipolar switching of the exchange-bias field in Co 2 TiO 4

A. Wei, S. Tao, Y. Fang, Z.D. Han, B. Qian, X.F. Jiang, H. Zhou, R.J. Tang, D.H. Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Coupling at the interfaces between antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic constituents is known to be responsible for the exchange-bias effect, where external stimulus like temperature, electric or magnetic fields are supposed to influence the associated phenomenology. In this paper, we prepare the polycrystalline Co 2 TiO 4 and investigate its temperature- and field-dependent magnetization, from which an unusual exchange-bias effect associated with magnetic reversals is extracted. At low temperature, a continuous crossover from negative to positive exchange-bias fields can be obtained with increment of the cooling magnetic field, showing a magnetically tunable effect. The bipolar switching of exchange-bias field in this compound depends on the relative orientation between Co 2+ and [Co 3+ Ti 3+ ] magnetic moments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advanced Condensed Matter Physics · Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Manna · Phys. Rep. · 2014 · 535 · 6110.1016/j.physrep.2013.10.002 ↗
2. Nordblad · Nat. Mater. · 2015 · 14 · 65510.1038/nmat4331 ↗
3. Kiwi · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2001 · 234 · 58410.1016/S0304-8853(01)00421-8 ↗
4. Zhanga · Mater. Sci. Eng. R · 2016 · 105 · 110.1016/j.mser.2016.04.001 ↗
5. Wang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 07720310.1103/PhysRevLett.106.077203 ↗
6. Nayak · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 110 · 12720410.1103/PhysRevLett.110.127204 ↗
7. Han · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 17240310.1063/1.4826654 ↗
8. Demirtas · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 494910.1063/1.1690857 ↗
9. Nguyen · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 09D70610.1063/1.3340456 ↗
10. Nogués · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 76 · 462410.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4624 ↗
11. Qian · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 01250310.1063/1.2426887 ↗
12. Manna · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 24250810.1063/1.3453530 ↗
13. Yoshii · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 14250110.1063/1.3644473 ↗
14. Singh · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 18250510.1063/1.3505525 ↗
15. Hong · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 10241110.1063/1.4751990 ↗
16. Kulkarni · EPL · 2009 · 86 · 4700310.1209/0295-5075/86/47003 ↗
17. Li · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 13720110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.137201 ↗
18. Nayak · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 21443410.1103/PhysRevB.92.214434 ↗
19. Nayak · J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 120 · 16390510.1063/1.4966172 ↗
20. Kulkarni · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 14441110.1103/PhysRevB.82.144411 ↗
21. Bora · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 18390210.1063/1.4826903 ↗
22. Binek · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 06720110.1103/PhysRevLett.96.067201 ↗
23. Shi · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 12250710.1063/1.3569140 ↗
24. Wang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 09391410.1063/1.2917087 ↗
25. Roth · J. Phys. France · 1964 · 25 · 50710.1051/jphys:01964002505050700 ↗