Influence of grain growth on the high-frequency behaviour of ferromagnetic Fe–Co–(M)–N (M=Ta, Hf) nanocomposite films
Source abstract
Abstract
The CMOS compatible ferromagnetic Fe-Co-(M)-N (M = Ta, Hf) films were investigated with regard to their grain size-dependent frequency behaviour. Predominantly Fe 33 Co 40 Ta 10 N 17 films were deposited by reactive r.f. magnetron sputtering. These films were compared to Fe 36 Co 44 Hf 9 N 11 films. In order to induce an in-plane uniaxial anisotropy H u as well as to investigate the grain growth behaviour, the films were annealed in a static magnetic field. The in-plane uniaxial anisotropy field of around 4 mT as well as a good soft magnetic behaviour with a saturation polarisation of approximately 1.2-1.4 T could be observed after heat treatment. Ferromagnetic resonance frequencies (FMR) of approximately up to 2.4 GHz could be achieved according to the Kittel theory. Depending on the heat treatment, high-frequency losses through energy dissipation was made conspicuous by means of the full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) Δf eff of the imaginary part of the frequency-dependent permeability which was between 0.4 and 1 GHz. This FWHM was basically discussed in terms of two-magnon scattering theories, in combination with the Herzer random anisotropy model. In order to correlate the resonance line broadening with a phenomenological damping parameter α eff , which ranged from about 0.0125 to 0.028, the modified Landau-Lifschitz-Gilbert equation was used to fit and describe the permeability spectra of the ferromagnetic films.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Yamaguchi · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 334110.1109/TMAG.2006.879636 ↗
2. Ni · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 282710.1109/TMAG.2006.879140 ↗
3. Seemann · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2006 · 302 · 32110.1016/j.jmmm.2005.05.042 ↗
4. Maruta · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 337710.1109/TMAG.2006.879443 ↗
5. Kondo · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 713010.1063/1.1555362 ↗
6. Lagarkov · Physica B · 2007 · 394 · 15910.1016/j.physb.2006.12.086 ↗
7. Gerber · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2007 · 43 · 262410.1109/TMAG.2007.893786 ↗
8. Li · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 09250110.1063/1.2889447 ↗
9. Arias · Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 60 · 739510.1103/PhysRevB.60.7395 ↗
10. Kuanr · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 286 · 27610.1016/j.jmmm.2004.09.080 ↗
11. Hurben · J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 81 · 434410.1063/1.365288 ↗
12. Ma · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 1999 · 57 · 9710.1016/S0921-5107(98)00311-0 ↗
13. Wei · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 2000 · 68 · 15610.1016/S0921-5107(99)00585-1 ↗
14. Kuhrt · J. Appl. Phys. · 1992 · 71 · 189610.1063/1.351177 ↗
15. Seemann · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2004 · 283 · 31010.1016/j.jmmm.2004.05.034 ↗
16. Bekker · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2004 · 270 · 32710.1016/j.jmmm.2003.08.033 ↗
17. Herzer · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1990 · 26 · 139710.1109/20.104389 ↗
18. Herzer · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 294 · 9910.1016/j.jmmm.2005.03.020 ↗
19. Seemann · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2004 · 278 · 20010.1016/j.jmmm.2003.11.402 ↗
20. Seemann · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2008 · 320 · 195210.1016/j.jmmm.2008.03.005 ↗