journal article·2024-01Open access

Characterizing quantum criticality in the transverse field Ising model with staggered Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction

D.C. Liu, Yao Heng Su, Xia Jin, Zhijie Zhao, Ai Min Chen

Abstract

The quantum criticality and entanglement properties are investigated in the one-dimensional spin-1/2 transverse field Ising model with staggered Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction by utilizing the infinite-time evolving block decimation method. In this model, the staggered Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction does not lead any new phase, while it only appears a phase transition line between Néel phase and paramagnetic phase. The behaviors of measurements of information illustrate the quantum phase transition and the existence of factorized points. The factorization phenomena is observed in the transverse Néel phase detecting by the entanglement quantities, in which the double degenerate ground state in transverse Néel phase is preserved by the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction also evidencing from the fidelity map. From the perspective of magnetism , the existence of chiral order and transverse Néel order suggests the helical magnetic structure induced by Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction. The critical exponents and central charge keep invariant and convinced that the phase transitions belong to the Ising universality class. In contrary to the systems confined within central charge c = 1 , although the competition between the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction and external field changes the phase transition and entanglement properties, the quantum criticality seems independent of Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum many-body systems · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Theoretical and Computational Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. Sachdev · 2011
2. Vojta · Rep. Progr. Phys. · 2003 · 66 · 206910.1088/0034-4885/66/12/R01 ↗
3. Osterloh · Nature · 2002 · 416 · 60810.1038/416608a ↗
4. Vidal · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 9010.1103/PhysRevLett.90.227902 ↗
5. De Chiara · Rep. Progr. Phys. · 2018 · 8110.1088/1361-6633/aabf61 ↗
6. Eugene Stanley · Rev. Modern Phys. · 1999 · 71 · S35810.1103/RevModPhys.71.S358 ↗
7. Continentino · 2017
8. den Nijs · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 23 · 611110.1103/PhysRevB.23.6111 ↗
9. Alet · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 9410.1103/PhysRevLett.94.235702 ↗
10. de Queiroz · Phys. Rev. E · 2011 · 84
11. Behan · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 11810.1103/PhysRevLett.118.241601 ↗
12. Su · Physica A · 2022 · 59410.1016/j.physa.2022.127005 ↗
13. Dzyaloshinskii · Sov. Phys. - JETP · 1957 · 5 · 1259
14. Moriya · Phys. Rev. · 1960 · 120 · 9110.1103/PhysRev.120.91 ↗
15. Wan · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83
16. Anderson · Phys. Rev. · 1950 · 79 · 35010.1103/PhysRev.79.350 ↗
17. Anderson · Phys. Rev. · 1959 · 115 · 210.1103/PhysRev.115.2 ↗
18. Liu · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1973 · 31 · 45910.1103/PhysRevLett.31.459 ↗
19. Kotov · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72
20. Garate · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81
21. Zyuzin · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85
22. Yi · Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 10010.1103/PhysRevB.100.024423 ↗
23. Thakur · Phys. Rev. B · 2020 · 10210.1103/PhysRevB.102.064409 ↗
24. Oshikawa · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 79 · 288310.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2883 ↗
25. Cao · Chin. Phys. B · 2022 · 31
26. Ding · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2021 · 52110.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167519 ↗
27. Luo · Phys. Rev. B · 2022 · 105
28. Yang · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · L199
29. Chen · Acta Phys. Sin. · 2020 · 69
30. Zhang · Phys. Rev. A · 2007 · 75
31. Fumani · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2021 · 51810.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167411 ↗
32. Çakmak · Entropy · 2015 · 17 · 79010.3390/e17020790 ↗
33. Roscilde · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 9410.1103/PhysRevLett.94.147208 ↗
34. Giampaolo · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 10010.1103/PhysRevLett.100.197201 ↗
35. Giorgi · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 79
36. Shi · Phys. Rev. A · 2016 · 9310.1103/PhysRevA.93.062341 ↗
37. Zhao · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90
38. Faure · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2019 · 12310.1103/PhysRevLett.123.027204 ↗
39. Cui · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2019 · 12310.1103/PhysRevLett.123.067203 ↗
40. Kinross · Phys. Rev. X · 2014 · 4
41. Pfeuty · Ann. Physics · 1970 · 57 · 7910.1016/0003-4916(70)90270-8 ↗
42. Gómez Albarracín · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 9710.1103/PhysRevB.97.104419 ↗
43. Soltani · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 476 · 58010.1016/j.jmmm.2018.12.019 ↗
44. Vidal · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 9810.1103/PhysRevLett.98.070201 ↗
45. Orús · Ann. Phys. · 2014 · 349 · 11710.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013 ↗
46. Suzuki · Progr. Theoret. Phys. · 1976 · 56 · 145410.1143/PTP.56.1454 ↗
47. Zhou · Phys. Rev. A · 2006 · 74
48. Zhang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107
49. Orús · Phys. Rev. A · 2006 · 73
50. Roscilde · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93
51. Giampaolo · Phys. Rev. A · 2007 · 7610.1103/PhysRevA.76.042301 ↗
52. De Chiara · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 10910.1103/PhysRevLett.109.237208 ↗
53. Wigner · Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA · 1963 · 49 · 91010.1073/pnas.49.6.910 ↗
54. Karpat · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 9010.1103/PhysRevB.90.104431 ↗
55. Gu · Internat. J. Modern Phys. B · 2010 · 24 · 437110.1142/S0217979210056335 ↗
56. Zhou · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100
57. Wu · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2017 · 29
58. Jahangiri · Chinese J. Phys. · 2023 · 83 · 7310.1016/j.cjph.2023.03.007 ↗
59. Jafari · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 7810.1103/PhysRevB.78.214414 ↗
60. Kawamura · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1998 · 10 · 4707
61. Yu · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 924210.1103/PhysRevB.54.9242 ↗
62. Cardy · J. Phys. A · 1987 · 20 · L89110.1088/0305-4470/20/13/014 ↗
63. Alcaraz · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1988 · 61 · 152910.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1529 ↗
64. Wu · Rev. Modern Phys. · 1982 · 54 · 23510.1103/RevModPhys.54.235 ↗
65. Calabrese · J. Phys. A · 2009 · 42
66. Tagliacozzo · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 7810.1103/PhysRevB.78.024410 ↗