journal article·2020-04

The influence of the DC-biased magnetic field on dynamic magnetic properties of the LaFeCoSi alloy

Roman Gozdur, Piotr Gębara, Krzysztof Chwastek

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The paper presents an experimental study of magnetic properties of the LaFeCoSi alloy near the magnetic phase transition at the Curie temperature of 306 K. The biased magnetizing field complies with the real magnetization of active magnetic regenerators, whereas the standards for testing soft magnetic materials recommend the approach based on the bipolar magnetizing field. The influence of the DC-biased magnetic field on dynamic hysteresis loops and power losses was studied. The investigations confirmed a significant drop of power losses under biased magnetization and proved that the impact of the time of the magnetizing field switching between the isomagnetic states is critical, as far as the field distribution inside the sample and the magnitude of magnetic losses are concerned.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Rare-earth and actinide compounds

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Pecharsky · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 449410.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4494 ↗
2. Guo · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 78 · 114210.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1142 ↗
3. Hu · Chin. Phys. · 2000 · 9 · 55010.1088/1009-1963/9/7/016 ↗
4. Hu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 367510.1063/1.1375836 ↗
5. Wada · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 330210.1063/1.1419048 ↗
6. Tegus · Nature · 2002 · 415 · 15010.1038/415150a ↗
7. Franco · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2018 · 93 · 11210.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.005 ↗
8. Monfared · Int. J. Refrig. · 2014 · 42 · 6910.1016/j.ijrefrig.2014.02.013 ↗
9. Balli · Appl. Phys. Rev. · 2017 · 4 · 2130510.1063/1.4983612 ↗
10. Gschneidner · Int. J. Refrig. · 2008 · 31 · 94510.1016/j.ijrefrig.2008.01.004 ↗
11. Yu · Int. J. Refrig. · 2010 · 33 · 102910.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.04.002 ↗
12. Shen · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 454510.1002/adma.200901072 ↗
13. Rowe · Int. J. Refrig. · 2011 · 34 · 16810.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.08.014 ↗
14. Gutfleisch · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 82110.1002/adma.201002180 ↗
15. Kitanovski · Int. J. Refrig. · 2014 · 37 · 2810.1016/j.ijrefrig.2013.05.014 ↗
16. Gómez · Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. · 2013 · 21 · 110.1016/j.rser.2012.12.018 ↗
17. Benedict · Int. J. Refrig. · 2017 · 74 · 19010.1016/j.ijrefrig.2016.09.023 ↗
18. Sasso · Phys. B Condens. Matter · 2006 · 372 · 910.1016/j.physb.2005.10.007 ↗
19. Basso · Int. J. Refrig. · 2006 · 29 · 135810.1016/j.ijrefrig.2006.08.001 ↗
20. Moore · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 93
21. Gozdur · Acta Phys. Pol. A. · 2015 · 128 · 9810.12693/APhysPolA.128.98 ↗
22. Gozdur · Acta Phys. Pol. A · 2017 · 131 · 129410.12693/APhysPolA.131.1294 ↗
23. Gozdur · Acta Phys. Pol. A · 2019 · 136 · 68910.12693/APhysPolA.136.689 ↗
24. Katter · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2008 · 44 · 304410.1109/TMAG.2008.2002523 ↗
25. Lyubina · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2009 · 321 · 357110.1016/j.jmmm.2008.03.063 ↗
26. Moore · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 410.1063/1.2173631 ↗
27. Gębara · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2017 · 442 · 14510.1016/j.jmmm.2017.06.111 ↗
28. Gębara · Curr. App. Phys. · 2019 · 19 · 18810.1016/j.cap.2018.12.001 ↗
29. Engelbrecht · Int. J. Refrig. · 2012 · 35 · 149810.1016/j.ijrefrig.2012.05.003 ↗
30. Monfared · Int. J. Refrig. · 2018 · 96 · 2510.1016/j.ijrefrig.2018.08.012 ↗
31. Eriksen · Int. J. Refrig. · 2015 · 58 · 1410.1016/j.ijrefrig.2015.05.004 ↗
32. Gozdur · J. Electr. Eng. · 2015 · 66 · 37