Scaling of the Rashba spin-orbit torque in magnetic domain walls
Source abstract
Abstract
Spin-orbit torque in magnetic domain walls was investigated by solving the Pauli-Schrödinger equation for the itinerant electrons. The Rashba interaction considered is derived from the violation of inversion symmetry at interfaces between ferromagnets and heavy metals. In equilibrium, the Rashba spin-orbit interaction gives rise to a torque corresponding to the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. When there is a current flowing, the spin-orbit torque experienced by the itinerant electrons in short domain walls has both field-like and damping-like components. However, when the domain wall width is increased, the damping-like component, which is the counterpart of the non-adiabatic spin transfer torque, decreases rapidly at the domain wall center. In contrast to the non-adiabatic spin transfer torque, the damping-like spin-orbit torque does not approach to zero far away from the domain wall center, even in the adiabatic limit. The scattering of spin-up and spin-down wave functions, which is caused by the Rashba spin-orbit interaction and the spatial variation of magnetization profile in the domain wall, gives rise to the finite damping-like spin-orbit torque.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. O’Handley · 2000
2. Hubert · 1998
3. Argyres · Phys. Rev. · 1955 · 97 · 33410.1103/PhysRev.97.334 ↗
4. Bruno · Phys. Rev. B · 1989 · 39 · 86510.1103/PhysRevB.39.865 ↗
5. Bruno · Appl. Phys. A · 1989 · 49 · 49910.1007/BF00617016 ↗
6. Garate · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 8010.1103/PhysRevB.80.134403 ↗
7. Manchon · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 7810.1103/PhysRevB.78.212405 ↗
8. Obata · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 7710.1103/PhysRevB.77.214429 ↗
9. Matos-Abiague · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 80
10. Gambardella · Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A · 2011 · 369 · 3175
11. Boulle · Nat. Nano · 2016 · 11 · 44910.1038/nnano.2015.315 ↗
12. Yang · Sci. Rep. · 2018 · 8 · 1235610.1038/s41598-018-30063-y ↗
13. Yang · Nat. Mater. · 2018 · 17 · 60510.1038/s41563-018-0079-4 ↗
14. Wang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 108
15. Kim · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111
16. Ortiz-Pauyac · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 10210.1063/1.4812663 ↗
17. Wang · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89
18. Pesin · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 8610.1103/PhysRevB.86.014416 ↗
19. van der Bijl · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 8610.1103/PhysRevB.86.094406 ↗
20. F. Freimuth, S. Blügel, Y. Mokrousov, arXiv:1305.4873.
21. Haney · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 8810.1103/PhysRevB.88.214417 ↗
22. Wimmer · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 9410.1103/PhysRevB.94.054415 ↗
23. Berger · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 935310.1103/PhysRevB.54.9353 ↗
24. Slonczewski · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 159 · L110.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 ↗
25. Li · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93
26. Thiaville · Europhys. Lett. · 2005 · 69 · 99010.1209/epl/i2004-10452-6 ↗
27. Xiao · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73
28. Dzyaloshinskii · Sov. Phys. JETP · 1957 · 5 · 1259
29. Moriya · Phys. Rev. · 1960 · 120 · 9110.1103/PhysRev.120.91 ↗
30. Bogdanov · Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. · 1989 · 95 · 178
31. Bogdanov · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1994 · 138 · 25510.1016/0304-8853(94)90046-9 ↗
32. Thiaville · Europhys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 5700210.1209/0295-5075/100/57002 ↗
33. Miron · Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 23010.1038/nmat2613 ↗
34. Miron · Nat. Mater. · 2011 · 10 · 41910.1038/nmat3020 ↗
35. Miron · Nature (London) · 2011 · 476 · 18910.1038/nature10309 ↗
36. Liu · Science · 2012 · 336 · 55510.1126/science.1218197 ↗
37. Bychkov · JETP Lett. · 1984 · 39 · 78
38. Yang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2015 · 115
39. Haney · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 10510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.126602 ↗
40. Calvo · Phys. Rev. B · 1978 · 18 · 507310.1103/PhysRevB.18.5073 ↗
41. Wang · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2017 · 53 · 1300110
42. The Hamiotonian corresponding to a Bloch DW is related to the Néel one through a unitary rotation U=exp(iπσz/4) to give HB=-∇2+kB2σ·M̂-ikα(σy∂y+σx∂x)=U†HU. The DM field is changed to HDM∝(ŷm̂′z-ẑm̂′y), in accordance with the Weyl form of the SOC in the Halmitonian H_B, which is also consistent with previous investigations [43]. The form of the SOT remains unchanged, since the effective field, which is proportional to ẑ×ĵ, does not change under the rotation.
43. Kikuchi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 11610.1103/PhysRevLett.116.247201 ↗
44. The GNU multiple precision arithmetic library GMP 6.1.2,https://gmplib.org.
45. Kurebayashi · Nat. Nanotech. · 2014 · 9 · 21110.1038/nnano.2014.15 ↗
46. Dugaev · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 6510.1103/PhysRevB.65.224419 ↗
47. Braun · Adv. Phys. · 2012 · 61 · 110.1080/00018732.2012.663070 ↗