Coexistence of short- and long-range ferromagnetic order in nanocrystalline Fe2Mn1−Cu Al (x=0.0, 0.1 and 0.3) synthesized by high-energy ball milling
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this work, we prepared nanocrystalline Fe 2 Mn 1− x Cu x Al ( x =0.0, 0.1 and 0.3) powders by the high energy ball milling technique, and then studied their critical properties. Our analysis reveals that the increase of Cu-doping concentration (up to x =0.3) in these powders leads to a gradual increase of the ferromagnetic–paramagnetic transition temperature from 406 to 452 K. The Banerjee criterion suggests that all the samples considered undergo a second-order phase transition. A modified Arrott plot and scaling analysis indicate that the critical exponents ( β =0.419 and 0.442, γ =1.082 and 1.116 for x =0.0 and 0.1, respectively) are located in between those expected for the 3D-Heisenberg and the mean-field models; the values of β =0.495 and γ =1.046 for x =0.3 sample are very close to those of the mean-field model. These features reveal the coexistence of the short- and long-range ferromagnetic order in the nanocrystalline Fe 2 Mn 1− x Cu x Al powders. Particularly, as the concentration of Cu increases, values of the critical exponent shift towards those of the mean-field model. Such results prove the Cu doping favors establishing a long-range ferromagnetic order.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Rare-earth and actinide compounds
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen · Mater. Today · 2013 · 16 · 38710.1016/j.mattod.2013.09.015 ↗
2. Bartholomé · J. Electron. Mater. · 2014 · 43 · 177510.1007/s11664-013-2863-x ↗
3. Casper · Semicond. Sci. Technol. · 2012 · 27 · 06300110.1088/0268-1242/27/6/063001 ↗
4. Wang · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2014 · 32 · 02080210.1116/1.4866418 ↗
5. Liu · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2014 · 616 · 18410.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.077 ↗
6. de Santanna · Sol. State Commun. · 2008 · 148 · 28910.1016/j.ssc.2008.09.015 ↗
7. Basso · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 85 · 01443010.1103/PhysRevB.85.014430 ↗
8. Katsnelson · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2008 · 80 · 31510.1103/RevModPhys.80.315 ↗
9. Žutić · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2004 · 76 · 32310.1103/RevModPhys.76.323 ↗
10. Sakuraba · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 19250810.1063/1.2202724 ↗
11. Galanakis · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 39 · 76510.1088/0022-3727/39/5/S01 ↗
12. Galanakis · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2007 · 19 · 315213
13. Felser · Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2007 · 46 · 66810.1002/anie.200601815 ↗
14. Feng · Solid State Commun. · 2010 · 150 · 94910.1016/j.ssc.2010.02.022 ↗
15. Duc · J. Korean Phys. Soc. · 2012 · 60 · 45410.3938/jkps.60.454 ↗
16. Zhu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 22251210.1063/1.3269590 ↗
17. Arrott · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1967 · 19 · 78610.1103/PhysRevLett.19.786 ↗
18. Kouvel · Phys. Rev. · 1964 · 136 · A162610.1103/PhysRev.136.A1626 ↗
19. Franco · Int. J. Refrig. · 2010 · 33 · 46510.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.12.019 ↗
20. Graf · Prog. Solid State Chem. · 2011 · 39 · 110.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2011.02.001 ↗
21. Stanley · 1971
22. Banerjee · Phys. Lett. · 1964 · 12 · 1610.1016/0031-9163(64)91158-8 ↗
23. Coey · 2010
24. Kim · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 22720210.1103/PhysRevLett.89.227202 ↗
25. Bonilla · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 22442410.1103/PhysRevB.81.224424 ↗