Analyses and verifications of magnetic shielding of long pipelines aiming for pipeline orientation measurements
Source abstract
Abstract
So far, none of conventional magnetic shielding models can model a field long pipeline consisting of many welded short sections with different permeabilities. This paper demonstrates the magnetic shielding model of long pipelines via simulation analyses based on the finite element method (FEM) and experimental verifications of the magnetic shielding of short pipes, torus pipes, and field long pipelines. The radial and axial shielding factors of a finite pipe can be accurately calculated by the FEM. As the pipe length increases, the axial factor rapidly converges to a value less than 1, and the convergence value is independent of the pipe length because of the magnetic charges at the two ends. For a long pipeline consisting of many short sections, the averaged shielding factors over a couple of adjacent sections are equal to that of an ideal infinite pipeline, and the axial factor is always equal to 1. An “average” strategy for field pipeline orientations that employs the averaged magnetic fields and shielding factors over several sections is then proposed and demonstrated. As the geomagnetic field is taken as the absolute reference, this orientation measurement method has no risk of divergence over a long time and distance. Index Terms—cylindrical magnetic shield, magnetic fields, pipeline orientation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Wireless Power Transfer Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. ICNIRP Secretariat, c/o Gunde Ziegelberger, c/o Bundesamt fur Strahlenschutz, Ingolstaedter. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (1 Hz–100 kHz). Health Phys 2010; 99: 818–836.10.1097/HP.0b013e3181f06c86 ↗
2. Magnetic Field Mitigation at Power Frequency: Design Principles and Case Studies10.1109/TIA.2014.2369813 ↗
3. Model, Design and Testing of Field Mill Sensors for Measuring Electric Fields under High-Voltage Direct Current Power Lines10.1109/TIE.2017.2719618 ↗
4. Haixia Liu, Kaiming Liu, Zhenjiang Liang, et al. Open-type magnetic shields for optical fiber coil protection with coaxial foil tubes. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2017; 53(5): 6000507 (7 pp.).10.1109/TMAG.2017.2669898 ↗
5. Celozzi S, Araneo R, and Lovat G. Electromagnetic Shielding. John Wiley & Sons Inc 2008; 164-199.10.1002/9780470268483 ↗
6. Rikitake T. Magnetic and electromagnetic shielding. Reidel Pub. Co. 1987, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
7. Canova A, Freschi F, Giaccone L, et al. Optimal design of closed multilayer magnetic shields. 2017 International Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Symposium - Italy, ACES 2017:1-2.10.23919/ROPACES.2017.7916413 ↗
8. Paperno E, Peliwal S, Romalis M V, et al. Optimum shell separation for closed axial cylindrical magnetic shields. J Appl Phys 2005; 97(10): 10Q104 (3 pp.).10.1063/1.1854254 ↗
9. Optimal three-layer cylindrical magnetic shield sets for scientific applications10.1063/1.1487892 ↗
10. Convectional magnetic shielding. J. Phys. D
11. Magnetic shields10.1109/TMAG.1970.1066714 ↗
12. Analysis of the shielding effectiveness of several magnetic shields
13. Overlap Technique for End-Cap Seals on Cylindrical Magnetic Shields10.1109/TMAG.2012.2215047 ↗
14. Mager A. Magnetic Shielding Efficiencies of Cylindrical Shells with Axis Parallel to the Field. J Appl Phys 1968; 39(3): 1914-1914.10.1063/1.1656455 ↗
15. Yeqing Hu, Chunsheng Lin, Jianjun Zhou. The Calculation of Magneto-static Shielding Effectiveness of Limited Length Cavity Cylinder Based on the Spheroid Model. Marine Electric & Electronic Technology 2011; 31(8): 45-47, 55.
16. Xinjing Huang, Guanren Chen, Yu Zhang, et al. Inversion of Magnetic Fields inside Pipelines: Modeling, Validations, and Applications. Struct. Health Monit. 2018; 17(1): 80-90.10.1177/1475921716684563 ↗
17. A detection system for pipeline direction based on shielded geomagnetic field10.1016/j.ijpvp.2013.11.001 ↗
18. Inversion of Magnetic Fields inside Pipelines: Modeling, Validations, and Applications10.1177/1475921716684563 ↗
19. Design of a Spherical Leak Detector for Submarine Oil Pipelines10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.709.460 ↗
20. CFD and Experimental Investigations of Drag Force on Spherical Leak Detector in Pipe Flows at High Reynolds Number
21. Performance enhancements of the spherical detector for pipeline spanning inspection through posture stabilization10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108095 ↗
22. Low-cost and High-efficiency Method for Detecting Vertical Bends of Subsea Pipelines10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2974405 ↗
23. Analysis of magneto static shielding effectiveness of the infinite cavity cylinder with magnetic material
24. Q. Bing. Quick Reference of Commonly Used Steel's Magnetic Characteristic Curve. China Machine Press, 2004: 17–18, Beijing, China.
25. The Physical Principles of Magnetism
26. Equivalent magnetic monopoles model for calculation of magnetic field
27. Guo Lin, Zeng Zhoumo, Huang Xinjing, Li Mingze, Feng Hao, Li Jian, Rui Xiaobo. Performance enhancements of the spherical detector for pipeline spanning inspection through posture stabilization.Measurement, 2020, 165: 108095.10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108095 ↗