journal article·2020-11Open access

Antiferromagnetic CuMnAs: Ab initio description of finite temperature magnetism and resistivity

David Wagenknecht, Karel Výborný, Karel Carva, Ilja Turek

Abstract

Noncollinear magnetic moments in antiferromagnets (AFM) lead to a complex behavior of electrical transport, even to a decreasing resistivity due to an increasing temperature. Proper treatment of such phenomena is required for understanding AFM systems at finite temperatures; however first-principles description of these effects is complicated. With ab initio techniques, we investigate three models of spin fluctuations (magnons) influencing the transport in AFM CuMnAs; the models are numerically feasible and easily implementable to other studies. We numerically justified a fully relativistic collinear disordered local moment approach and we present its uncompensated generalization. A saturation or a decrease of resistivity caused by magnons, phonons, and their combination (above approx. 400 K) was observed and explained by changes in electronic structure. Within the coherent potential approximation, our finite-temperature approaches may be applied also to systems with impurities, which are found to have a large impact not only on residual resistivity, but also on canting of magnetic moments from the AFM to the ferromagnetic (FM) state.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Baltz · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2018 · 01500510.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005 ↗
2. Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine
3. Wadley · Nature Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 232210.1038/ncomms3322 ↗
4. Železný · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 15720110.1103/PhysRevLett.113.157201 ↗
5. Jungwirth · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2016 · 11 · 23110.1038/nnano.2016.18 ↗
6. Wadley · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1707910.1038/srep17079 ↗
7. Uhlířová · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2019 · 771 · 68010.1016/j.jallcom.2018.08.199 ↗
8. Wagenknecht · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2017 · 53 · 170020510.1109/TMAG.2017.2697400 ↗
9. D. Wagenknecht, K. Carva, I. Turek, Proceedings of SPIE 10357 (2017) 10357–10357 – 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2273315.10.1117/12.2273315 ↗
10. Drchal · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 98 · 13444210.1103/PhysRevB.98.134442 ↗
11. Wagenknecht · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 474 · 51710.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.047 ↗
12. Wagenknecht · Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 99 · 17443310.1103/PhysRevB.99.174433 ↗
13. Wagenknecht · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2020 · 32 · 185802
14. Ebert · Phys. Rev. · 2015 · 165132
15. Ebert · Phys .Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 107 · 06660310.1103/PhysRevLett.107.066603 ↗
16. Ködderitzsch · New J. Phys. · 2013 · 15 · 05300910.1088/1367-2630/15/5/053009 ↗
17. Glasbrenner · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 89 · 17440810.1103/PhysRevB.89.174408 ↗
18. Starikov · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 97 · 21441510.1103/PhysRevB.97.214415 ↗
19. Belashchenko · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 91 · 18040810.1103/PhysRevB.91.180408 ↗
20. Staunton · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 9310.1103/PhysRevLett.93.257204 ↗
21. Staunton · Phys. Rev. · 2006 · 14441110.1103/PhysRevB.74.144411 ↗
22. Máca · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 474 · 46710.1016/j.jmmm.2018.10.145 ↗
23. Železný · Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 95 · 01440310.1103/PhysRevB.95.014403 ↗
24. Turek · 1997
25. Turek · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 01440510.1103/PhysRevB.86.014405 ↗
26. Carva · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 14442110.1103/PhysRevB.73.144421 ↗
27. Shick · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 12520710.1103/PhysRevB.69.125207 ↗
28. Drchal · Physi. Rev. B · 2017 · 96 · 02443210.1103/PhysRevB.96.024432 ↗
29. Drchal · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 475 · 76710.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.112 ↗
30. Zhang · Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 96 · 23510510.1103/PhysRevB.96.235105 ↗
31. Volný · Phys. Rev. Materials · 2020 · 4 · 06440310.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.064403 ↗
32. Wysocki · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 101 · 09G50610.1063/1.2670472 ↗
33. Wysocki · Phys. Rev. B · 2009 · 22442310.1103/PhysRevB.80.224423 ↗
34. Kudrnovský · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 14442310.1103/PhysRevB.86.144423 ↗
35. Staunton · J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. · 1985 · 15 · 138710.1088/0305-4608/15/6/019 ↗
36. Gyorffy · J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. · 1985 · 15 · 133710.1088/0305-4608/15/6/018 ↗
37. Drchal · EPJ Web f Conf. · 2013 · 40
38. Veis · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 97 · 12510910.1103/PhysRevB.97.125109 ↗
39. Kotani · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 16510610.1103/PhysRevB.76.165106 ↗
40. Máca · Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 96 · 09440610.1103/PhysRevB.96.094406 ↗
41. Brouers · J. de Physique Letters · 1975 · 36 · 1710.1051/jphyslet:0197500360101700 ↗