Inertial domain wall characterization in layered multisublattice antiferromagnets
Source abstract
Abstract
The motion of a Néel-like 180∘ domain wall induced by a time-dependent staggered spin–orbit field in the layered collinear antiferromagnet Mn2Au is explored. Through an effective version of the two sublattice nonlinear σ-model which does not take into account the antiferromagnetic exchange interaction directed along the tetragonal c-axis, it is possible to replicate accurately the relativistic and inertial traces intrinsic to the magnetic texture dynamics obtained through atomistic spin dynamics simulations for quasistatic processes. In the case in which the steady-state magnetic soliton motion is extinguished due to the abrupt shutdown of the external stimulus, its stored relativistic exchange energy is transformed into a complex translational mobility, being the rigid domain wall profile approximation no longer suitable. Although it is not feasible to carry out a detailed follow-up of its temporal evolution in this case, it is possible to predict the inertial-based distance travelled by the domain wall in relation to its steady-state relativistic mass. This exhaustive dynamical characterization for different time-dependent regimes of the driving force is of potential interest in antiferromagnetic domain wall-based device applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Gomonay · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 11710.1103/PhysRevLett.117.017202 ↗
2. Shiino · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 11710.1103/PhysRevLett.117.087203 ↗
3. Yang · Phys. Rev. B · 2019 · 10010.1103/PhysRevB.100.024407 ↗
4. Otxoa · Commun. Phys. · 2020 · 3 · 19010.1038/s42005-020-00456-5 ↗
5. Kim · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 9010.1103/PhysRevB.90.104406 ↗
6. Tatara · Phys. Rev. Res. · 2020 · 210.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043226 ↗
7. Tveten · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 11010.1103/PhysRevLett.110.127208 ↗
8. Yuan · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 9710.1103/PhysRevB.97.214434 ↗
9. Selzer · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2016 · 11710.1103/PhysRevLett.117.107201 ↗
10. Železnỳ · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 11310.1103/PhysRevLett.113.157201 ↗
11. Wadley · Science · 2016 · 351 · 58710.1126/science.aab1031 ↗
12. Olejník · Nature Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 1543410.1038/ncomms15434 ↗
13. Grzybowski · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 11810.1103/PhysRevLett.118.057701 ↗
14. Zhou · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2018 · 910.1103/PhysRevApplied.9.054028 ↗
15. Bodnar · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2020 · 14
16. Barthem · J. Magn. Mat. · 2016 · 406 · 28910.1016/j.jmmm.2015.07.101 ↗
17. Sapozhnik · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 9710.1103/PhysRevB.97.134429 ↗
18. Kašpar · Nat. Electr. · 2021 · 4 · 3010.1038/s41928-020-00506-4 ↗
19. Janda · Phys. Rev. Mat. · 2020 · 4
20. Otxoa · Commun. Phys. · 2020 · 3 · 3110.1038/s42005-020-0296-4 ↗
21. Yang · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 22110.1038/nnano.2014.324 ↗
22. Lequeux · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 110.1038/srep31510 ↗
23. Luo · Nature · 2020 · 579 · 21410.1038/s41586-020-2061-y ↗
24. Shick · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 8110.1103/PhysRevB.81.212409 ↗
25. Barthem · Nature Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 289210.1038/ncomms3892 ↗
26. Masrour · J. Magn. Mat. · 2015 · 393 · 60010.1016/j.jmmm.2015.05.085 ↗
27. Khmelevskyi · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 9310.1063/1.3003878 ↗
28. Wells · Acta Crystallogr. A · 1970 · 26 · 37910.1107/S056773947000092X ↗
29. Roy · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 9410.1103/PhysRevB.94.014439 ↗
30. Turov · 2010
31. Zvezdin · JETP Lett. · 1979 · 29 · 553
32. Bar’yakhtar · Sov. Phys. Uspekhi · 1985 · 28 · 56310.1070/PU1985v028n07ABEH003871 ↗
33. Lifshitz · 1980
34. Papanicolaou · Phys. Rev. B · 1995 · 51 · 1506210.1103/PhysRevB.51.15062 ↗
35. Tveten · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 9310.1103/PhysRevB.93.104408 ↗
36. Kosevich · Phys. Rep. · 1990 · 194 · 11710.1016/0370-1573(90)90130-T ↗
37. Zvezdin · J. Exp. Theor. Phys. · 1999 · 89 · 73410.1134/1.559035 ↗
38. Arana · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 11110.1063/1.5001705 ↗
39. Bar’yakhtar · Solid State Commun. · 1980 · 34 · 54510.1016/0038-1098(80)90148-9 ↗
40. Andreev · Sov. Phys. Uspekhi · 1980 · 23 · 2110.1070/PU1980v023n01ABEH004859 ↗
41. Rajaraman · 1982
42. Schryer · J. Appl. Phys. · 1974 · 45 · 540610.1063/1.1663252 ↗
43. Gomonay · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 9810.1103/PhysRevB.98.104430 ↗
44. It should be noted that the absence of periodicity along the z-th spatial direction in the simulated ultrathin film does not guarantee the condition m1,2=m3,4 used in Section 3, which allowed us to reduce the system description to a two-sublattice-based nonlinear σ-model.