journal article·2017-11

Gigantic perpendicular magnetic anisotropy of heavy transition metal cappings on Fe/MgO(0 0 1)

P. Taivansaikhan, D. Odkhuu, S.H. Rhim, S.C. Hong

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Effects of capping layer by 5 d transition metals (TM = Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, and Au) on Fe/MgO(0 0 1), a typical magnetic tunneling junction, are systematically investigated using first-principles calculation for magnetism and magnetocrystalline-anisotropy (MCA). The early TMs having less than half-filled d bands favor magnetization antiparallel to Fe, whereas the late TMs having more than half-filled d bands favor parallel, which is explained in the framework of kinetic exchange energy. The Os capping, isovalent to Fe, enhances MCA significantly to gigantic energy of +11.31 meV/cell, where positive contribution is mostly from the partially filled majority d bands of magnetic quantum number of |m| = 1 along with stronger spin-orbit coupling of Os than Fe. Different TM cappings give different MCA energies as the Fermi level shifts according to the valence of TM: Re and Ir, just one valence more or less than Os, have still large PMCA but smaller than the Os. In the W and Pt cappings, valence difference by two, PMCA are further reduced; MCAs are lowered compared to Fe/MgO(0 0 1) by the cappings of the very early TMs (Hf and Ta), while the very late TM (Au) switches sign to in-plane MCA.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Khvalkovskiy · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 46 · 07400110.1088/0022-3727/46/7/074001 ↗
2. Chappert · Nat. Mater. · 2007 · 6 · 81310.1038/nmat2024 ↗
3. Kent · Nat. Nanotechol. · 2015 · 10 · 18710.1038/nnano.2015.24 ↗
4. Ikeda · Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 72110.1038/nmat2804 ↗
5. Wang · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 6410.1038/nmat3171 ↗
6. Lambert · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 12241010.1063/1.4798291 ↗
7. Nakamura · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 220409(R)10.1103/PhysRevB.81.220409 ↗
8. Odkhuu · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2016 · 414 · 12610.1016/j.jmmm.2016.04.027 ↗
9. Edström · Phys. Rev. B · 2015 · 92 · 17441310.1103/PhysRevB.92.174413 ↗
10. Bhandary · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 09240110.1103/PhysRevB.84.092401 ↗
11. Odkhuu · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 18440510.1103/PhysRevB.88.184405 ↗
12. Taivansaikhan · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17A32710.1063/1.4917266 ↗
13. Taivansaikhan · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2014 · 14 · 901110.1166/jnn.2014.10078 ↗
14. Odkhuu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 15250210.1063/1.3578190 ↗
15. Tsujikawa · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07C10710.1063/1.3540677 ↗
16. Worledge · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 02250110.1063/1.3536482 ↗
17. Shiota · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 08241010.1063/1.4819199 ↗
18. Liu · AIP. Adv. · 2012 · 2 · 03215110.1063/1.4748337 ↗
19. Cheng · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 03391010.1063/1.4742195 ↗
20. Liu · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 589510.1038/srep05895 ↗
21. An · Acta. Mater. · 2015 · 87 · 25910.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.022 ↗
22. Kresse · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
23. Blöchl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
24. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
25. Wyckoff · Cryst. Struct. · 1963 · 1
26. Wang · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 47 · 1493210.1103/PhysRevB.47.14932 ↗
27. Wu · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 200 · 49810.1016/S0304-8853(99)00351-0 ↗