journal article·2017-01

Magnetic anisotropy of grain boundaries in nanocrystalline Ni

Q. Bian, M. Niewczas

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Temperature-dependent magnetic anisotropy due to grain boundaries in nanocrystalline Ni has been studied by simulating experimental magnetization data with the stochastic Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert theory. In the model the grain boundary magnetic anisotropy energy is expressed as the sum of the uniaxial anisotropy and the cubic anisotropy, characterized by K ua and K ca anisotropy constants. By comparing the calculated magnetization with the experimental magnetization measurements at finite temperatures, the values of K ua and K ca can be determined. For nanocrystalline Ni it is found that with increasing temperature K ua decreases and K ca increases. At low temperatures K ua dominates the grain boundary anisotropy energy, whereas K ca is very small and it can be neglected. At room temperature K ua and K ca are of the same order with the corresponding ratio K ua / K ca ≈ 1.9 , both coefficients are much larger than the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. D. Fiorani (Ed.), Surface Effects in Magnetic Nanoparticles, 2005.10.1007/b136494 ↗
2. Bødker · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1994 · 72 · 28210.1103/PhysRevLett.72.282 ↗
3. Respaud · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 57 · 292510.1103/PhysRevB.57.2925 ↗
4. Kachkachi · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 66 · 17441910.1103/PhysRevB.66.174419 ↗
5. Garanin · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 90 · 06550410.1103/PhysRevLett.90.065504 ↗
6. Jamet · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 69 · 02440110.1103/PhysRevB.69.024401 ↗
7. Gaunt · J. Appl. Phys. · 1986 · 59 · 412910.1063/1.336671 ↗
8. Dormann · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 53 · 1429110.1103/PhysRevB.53.14291 ↗
9. Yanes · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 06441610.1103/PhysRevB.76.064416 ↗
10. Pérez · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 47570410.1088/0957-4484/19/47/475704 ↗
11. Goya · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 94 · 352010.1063/1.1599959 ↗
12. Kachkachi · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2004 · 278 · 33410.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.1354 ↗
13. Kachkachi · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 73 · 22440210.1103/PhysRevB.73.224402 ↗
14. Yanes · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 43 · 47400910.1088/0022-3727/43/47/474009 ↗
15. Jamet · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 86 · 467610.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4676 ↗
16. Bian · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 01390910.1063/1.4905543 ↗
17. Stoner · Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A · 1948 · 240 · 59910.1098/rsta.1948.0007 ↗
18. García-Palacios · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 1493710.1103/PhysRevB.58.14937 ↗
19. Bian · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116 · 03392110.1063/1.4890615 ↗
20. Franse · Physica · 1968 · 39 · 47710.1016/0031-8914(68)90028-1 ↗
21. Birss · J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. · 1977 · 7 · 168310.1088/0305-4608/7/9/012 ↗
22. Serway · 2000 · 963
23. Bertotti · 2009 · 271
24. d'Aquino · J. Comput. Phys. · 2005 · 209 · 73010.1016/j.jcp.2005.04.001 ↗
25. d'Aquino · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 99 · 08B90510.1063/1.2169472 ↗
26. Asselin · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 82 · 05441510.1103/PhysRevB.82.054415 ↗