Origin of open recoil curves in L10-A1 FePt exchange coupled nanocomposite thin film
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Mixed phase FePt systems with intergranular coupling may be looked upon as natural exchange spring systems. The coupling strength between the soft and hard phase in these systems can be analyzed using recoil curves. However, the origin of open recoil curves depicting the breakdown of exchange coupling or anisotropy variation in hard phase is still an ambiguity and requires an in-depth analysis. In order to investigate this, an analysis of the recoil curves for L1 0 –A1 FePt nanocomposite thin films of varying thickness have been performed. The switching field distribution reveals that the maximum of openness of recoil curve is directly proportional to the amount of uncoupled soft phase present in the system. The coupling between the hard and soft phase is also found to increase with the thickness of the film. Monte Carlo simulations on a model three dimensional array of interacting nanomagnetic grains provide further insight into the effect of inter granular exchange interactions between the soft and hard phases.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 04250810.1063/1.2430910 ↗
2. Takahashi · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 40 · L136710.1143/JJAP.40.L1367 ↗
3. Takahashi · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 246 · 25910.1016/S0304-8853(02)00065-3 ↗
4. Medwal · J. Nanopart. Res. · 2013 · 15 · 142310.1007/s11051-013-1423-x ↗
5. Medwal · J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 47 · 35500210.1088/0022-3727/47/35/355002 ↗
6. Gupta · Mater. Res. Bull. · 2013 · 48 · 388110.1016/j.materresbull.2013.05.119 ↗
7. Gupta · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2013 · 345 · 6010.1016/j.jmmm.2013.06.023 ↗
8. Kneller · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1991 · 27 · 358810.1109/20.102931 ↗
9. Harland · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2004 · 271 · 5310.1016/j.jmmm.2003.09.014 ↗
10. Kang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 98 · 11390610.1063/1.2138785 ↗
11. Choi · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 02250210.1063/1.2752534 ↗
12. Zheng · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 18250310.1063/1.3013837 ↗
13. McCallum · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2006 · 299 · 47210.1016/j.jmmm.2005.05.006 ↗
14. Lyubina · J. Phys. Condens. Matter. · 2005 · 17 · 415710.1088/0953-8984/17/26/014 ↗
15. Takahashi · Scr. Mater. · 2005 · 53 · 40310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.04.037 ↗
16. Sharma · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 420310.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.022 ↗
17. Lamba · Eur. Phys. J. B · 2004 · 39 · 1910.1140/epjb/e2004-00165-2 ↗
18. Malik · Eur. Phys. J. B · 2010 · 74 · 7510.1140/epjb/e2010-00065-x ↗
19. Skomski · 2012
20. Menshikov · Phys. Status Solidi · 1975 · 28 · K8510.1002/pssa.2210280167 ↗
21. Skomski · Nanomagn. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. · 2003 · 15 · R84110.1088/0953-8984/15/20/202 ↗
22. Binder · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1970 · 31 · 39110.1016/0022-3697(70)90119-8 ↗