Influence of Pt thickness on magnetization reversal processes in (Pt/Co)3 multilayers with perpendicular anisotropy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We present a detailed study of the magnetization reversal in perpendicularly magnetized (Pt/Co) 3 multilayers with different values of the platinum interlayer thickness t Pt . To study the magnetization reversal in our samples we combined measurements of relaxation curves with the direct visualization of domain structures. Magnetization reversal was dominated by domain wall propagation for t Pt =1 nm and by domain nucleation for t Pt =0.2 nm, while a mixed process was observed for t Pt =0.8 nm. We interpret our results within the framework of a model of thermally activated reversal where a distribution of activation energy barriers is taken into account. The reversal process was correlated with the energy barrier distribution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Dorantes-Davila · Physical Review Letters · 2003 · 91 · 19720610.1103/PhysRevLett.91.197206 ↗
2. El Gabaly · Physical Review Letters · 2006 · 96 · 14720210.1103/PhysRevLett.96.147202 ↗
3. Lee · Physical Review B · 2002 · 65 · 14443710.1103/PhysRevB.65.144437 ↗
4. Kisielewski · Physical Review Letters · 2002 · 89 · 08720310.1103/PhysRevLett.89.087203 ↗
5. Langer · Physical Review B · 2002 · 66 · 17240110.1103/PhysRevB.66.172401 ↗
6. Enders · Physical Review Letters · 2003 · 90 · 21720310.1103/PhysRevLett.90.217203 ↗
7. Suzuki · IEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 1992 · 28 · 275410.1109/20.179618 ↗
8. Adanlété Adjanoh · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2010 · 322 · 249810.1016/j.jmmm.2010.03.008 ↗
9. Adanlété Adjanoh · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2011 · 323 · 50410.1016/j.jmmm.2010.10.002 ↗
10. Belhi · Journal of Applied Physics · 2010 · 108 · 09392410.1063/1.3506533 ↗
11. Mathet · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2003 · 260 · 29510.1016/S0304-8853(02)01178-2 ↗
12. Kim · Physical Review B · 2002 · 65 · 10442810.1103/PhysRevB.65.104428 ↗
13. Huang · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2000 · 209 · 9010.1016/S0304-8853(99)00652-6 ↗
14. Czapkiewicz · Physical Review B · 2008 · 77 · 02441610.1103/PhysRevB.77.024416 ↗
15. Romanens · European Physical Journal B · 2005 · 45 · 18510.1140/epjb/e2005-00053-3 ↗
16. Meneghini · European Physical Journal B · 1999 · 7 · 34710.1007/s100510050621 ↗
17. Jang · Journal of Applied Physics · 2003 · 93 · 1014310.1063/1.1577220 ↗
18. Chappert · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 1986 · 54 · 79510.1016/0304-8853(86)90257-X ↗
19. Lee · Physical Review Letters · 1989 · 62 · 65310.1103/PhysRevLett.62.653 ↗
20. Nakajima · Physical Review Letters · 1998 · 81 · 522910.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5229 ↗
21. Geissler · Physical Review B · 2001 · 65 · 02040510.1103/PhysRevB.65.020405 ↗
22. Fatuzzo · Physical Review · 1962 · 127 · 199910.1103/PhysRev.127.1999 ↗
23. Labrune · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 1989 · 80 · 21110.1016/0304-8853(89)90120-0 ↗
24. Shen · Journal of Applied Physics · 1993 · 73 · 641810.1063/1.352618 ↗
25. Bruno · Journal of Applied Physics · 1990 · 68 · 575910.1063/1.346944 ↗