Ferromagnetic behavior of nanocrystalline Cu–Mn alloy prepared by ball milling
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract 50Cu–50Mn (wt%) alloy was produced by ball milling. The milling was continued up to 30 h followed by isothermal annealing over a four interval of temperature from 350 to 650 °C held for 1 h. Crystallite size, lattice strain, lattice parameter were determined by Rietveld refinement structure analysis of X-ray diffraction data. The amount of dissolved/precipitated Mn (wt%) after ball milling/milling followed by annealing was calculated by quantative phase analysis (QPA). The increase of coercivity could be attributed to the introduction of lattice strain and reduction of crystallite size as a function of milling time. Electron paramagnetic resonance and superconducting quantum interface device analysis indicate that soft ferromagnetic behavior has been achieved by ball milled and annealed Cu–Mn alloy. The maximum coercivity value of Cu–Mn alloy obtained after annealing at 350 °C for 1 h is 277 Oe.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Chantrell · 1994 · 113
2. Zahn · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1980 · MAG-16 · 38710.1109/TMAG.1980.1060591 ↗
3. Gunther · Phys. World · 1990 · 2 · 2810.1088/2058-7058/3/12/21 ↗
4. Gu · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 1570210.1021/ja0359310 ↗
5. Mishra · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2005 · 5 · 207610.1166/jnn.2005.187 ↗
6. Makhlouf · Solid State Commun. · 2008 · 145 · 110.1016/j.ssc.2007.10.019 ↗
7. Bodker · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2000 · 221 · 3210.1016/S0304-8853(00)00392-9 ↗
8. Punnoose · J. Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 17442010.1103/PhysRevB.64.174420 ↗
9. Mondal · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 2010 · 116 · 17410.1016/j.mseb.2009.11.003 ↗
10. Mondal · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2012 · 324 · 277610.1016/j.jmmm.2012.04.009 ↗
11. Mondal · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 309 · 29010.1016/j.jmmm.2006.07.011 ↗
12. Mondal · Mater. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 110 · 49010.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.03.005 ↗
13. Mondal · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2011 · 42 · 51710.1007/s11661-010-0432-y ↗
14. Restrepo · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2005 · 290–291 · 60210.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.275 ↗
15. Mondal · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2013 · 341 · 4010.1016/j.jmmm.2013.04.029 ↗
16. Diemy · Phys. Rev. B · 1991 · 43 · 129710.1103/PhysRevB.43.1297 ↗
17. Kools · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1996 · 32 · 616510.1109/20.508381 ↗
18. Oti · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1997 · 33 · 3297
19. Balzar · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2004 · 37 · 91110.1107/S0021889804022551 ↗
20. Aguilar · J. Alloys Compd. · 2010 · 504 · 10210.1016/j.jallcom.2010.05.061 ↗
21. Yousefi · Mater. Des. · 2012 · 37 · 32510.1016/j.matdes.2012.01.011 ↗
22. Bish · J. Appl. Cryst. · 1988 · 21 · 8610.1107/S0021889887009415 ↗
23. Tiwari · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 10443310.1103/PhysRevB.72.104433 ↗
24. Ghosh · J. Mater. Chem. · 2006 · 16 · 10610.1039/B511920K ↗
25. Khajepour · J. Alloys Compd. · 2011 · 509 · 772910.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.095 ↗
26. Lee · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 96 · 04211510.1063/1.3294635 ↗