Resolving ambiguities in core size determination of magnetic nanoparticles from magnetic frequency mixing data
Source abstract
Abstract
Frequency mixing magnetic detection (FMMD) has been widely utilized as a measurement technique in magnetic immunoassays. It can also be used for the characterization and distinction (also known as “colourization”) of different types of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) based on their core sizes. In a previous work, it was shown that the large particles contribute most of the FMMD signal. This leads to ambiguities in core size determination from fitting since the contribution of the small-sized particles is almost undetectable among the strong responses from the large ones. In this work, we report on how this ambiguity can be overcome by modelling the signal intensity using the Langevin model in thermodynamic equilibrium including a lognormal core size distribution fL(dc,d0,σ) fitted to experimentally measured FMMD data of immobilized MNPs. For each given median diameter d0, an ambiguous amount of best-fitting pairs of parameters distribution width σ and number of particles Np with R² > 0.99 are extracted. By determining the samples’ total iron mass, mFe, with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), we are then able to identify the one specific best-fitting pair (σ, Np) one uniquely. With this additional externally measured parameter, we resolved the ambiguity in core size distribution and determined the parameters (d0, σ, Np) directly from FMMD measurements, allowing precise MNPs sample characterization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Biosensing using magnetic particle detection techniques10.3390/s17102300 ↗
2. Magnetic nanomaterials in microfluidic sensors for virus detection: a review10.1021/acsanm.1c01077 ↗
3. Biomedical nanomagnetics: a spin through possibilities in imaging, diagnostics, and therapy10.1109/TMAG.2010.2046907 ↗
4. Iron oxide nanoparticles: diagnostic, therapeutic and theranostic applications10.1016/j.addr.2019.01.005 ↗
5. Pankhurst, Q.A.; Thanh, N.T.K.; Jones, S.K.; Dobson, J. Progress in Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles in Biomedicine. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2009, 42, 224001, doi:10.1088/0022-3727/42/22/224001.10.1088/0022-3727/42/22/224001 ↗
6. Recent advances incorporating superparamagnetic nanoparticles into immunoassays10.1021/acsanm.7b00025 ↗
7. Biochemical and biomedical applications of multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles: a review10.1007/s11051-011-0551-4 ↗
8. Combining bulk temperature and nanoheating enables advanced magnetic fluid hyperthermia efficacy on pancreatic tumor cells10.1038/s41598-018-31553-9 ↗
9. Assessing magnetic fluid hyperthermia : magnetic relaxation simulation, modeling of nanoparticle uptake inside pancreatic tumor cells and in vitro efficacy
10. Magnetic Fluid Hyperthermia: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunity10.3109/02656736.2013.837200 ↗
11. A perspective on cell tracking with magnetic particle imaging10.18383/j.tom.2020.00043 ↗
12. Herynek, V.; Babič, M.; Kaman, O.; Charvátová, H.; Veselá, M.; Šefc, L. Development of Novel Nanoparticles for MPI. International Journal on Magnetic Particle Imaging 2020, 6, doi:10.18416/IJMPI.2020.2009019.
13. Magnetic nanomaterials as contrast agents for MRI10.3390/ma13112586 ↗
14. Magnetic nanoparticles as MRI contrast agents10.1007/s41061-020-00302-w ↗
15. Size-isolation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles improves MRI
16. Characterization of magnetic nanoparticle by dynamic light scattering10.1186/1556-276X-8-381 ↗
17. Best practices for characterization of magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03518 ↗
18. Versatile SQUID susceptometer with multiple measurement modes10.1109/TMAG.2013.2241029 ↗
19. Synthesis and characterization of magnetic drug carriers modified with Tb3+ Ions10.3390/nano12050795 ↗
20. Ludwig, F.; Guillaume, A.; Schilling, M.; Frickel, N.; Schmidt, A.M. Determination of Core and Hydrodynamic Size Distributions of CoFe2O4 Nanoparticle Suspensions Using Ac Susceptibility Measurements. Journal of Applied Physics 2010, 108, 033918, doi:10.1063/1.3463350.10.1063/1.3463350 ↗
21. Analysis of AC susceptibility spectra for the characterization of magnetic nanoparticles
22. Measurements of particle size distribution parameters in ferrofluids10.1109/TMAG.1978.1059918 ↗
23. The scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination10.1103/PhysRev.56.978 ↗
24. A novel method for antibiotic detection in milk based on competitive magnetic immunodetection10.3390/foods9121773 ↗
25. Sensitive Aflatoxin B1 detection using nanoparticle-based competitive magnetic immunodetection10.3390/toxins12050337 ↗
26. Multiplex detection of different magnetic beads using frequency scanning in magnetic frequency mixing technique10.3390/s19112599 ↗
27. Multiplex detection of magnetic beads using offset field dependent frequency mixing magnetic detection10.3390/s21175859 ↗
28. Achtsnicht, S.; Neuendorf, C.; Faßbender, T.; Nölke, G.; Offenhäusser, A.; Krause, H.-J.; Schröper, F. Sensitive and Rapid Detection of Cholera Toxin Subunit B Using Magnetic Frequency Mixing Detection. PLOS ONE 2019, 14, e0219356, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219356.10.1371/journal.pone.0219356 ↗
29. Magnetic detection structure for lab-on-chip applications based on the frequency mixing technique10.3390/s18061747 ↗
30. Comparative modeling of frequency mixing measurements of magnetic nanoparticles using micromagnetic simulations and langevin theory10.3390/nano11051257 ↗
31. Krishnan · 2016
32. Ultrafine metal particles10.1063/1.322870 ↗
33. T. Sasayama, T. Yoshida, M.M. Saari, K. Enpuku, Comparison of Volume Distribution of Magnetic Nanoparticles Obtained from M-H Curve with a Mixture of Log-Normal Distributions, Journal of Applied Physics 117 (17). Available online: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.4919268.10.1063/1.4919268 ↗
34. Magnetic particle detection by frequency mixing for immunoassay applications10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.1164 ↗
35. Nanoflowers versus magnetosomes: comparison between two promising candidates for magnetic hyperthermia therapy10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3096740 ↗
36. Improved biocompatibility and efficient labeling of neural stem cells with poly(L-Lysine)-coated maghemite nanoparticles10.3762/bjnano.7.84 ↗
37. Effect of changing iron content and excitation frequency on magnetic particle imaging signal
38. Long circulating tracer tailored for magnetic particle imaging10.7150/ntno.58548 ↗
39. Suitability of commercial colloids for magnetic hyperthermia10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.075 ↗
40. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-C595: potential MR imaging contrast agents for ovarian cancer detection10.4103/0971-6203.121198 ↗
41. Internal magnetic structure of nanoparticles dominates time-dependent relaxation processes in a magnetic field10.1002/adfm.201500405 ↗
42. Modeling magnetic nanoparticle dipole-dipole interactions inside living cells10.1103/PhysRevB.84.075480 ↗
43. Effect of magnetic dipolar interactions on nanoparticle heating efficiency: implications for cancer hyperthermia10.1038/srep02887 ↗
44. Size effects in the magnetic anisotropy of embedded cobalt nanoparticles: from shape to surface10.1038/srep14749 ↗
45. Nanoparticle core size optimization for magnetic particle imaging10.1088/2057-1976/ab3972 ↗
46. Magnetic particle imaging: a novel in vivo imaging platform for cancer detection10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04865 ↗
47. Predicting size-dependent heating efficiency of magnetic nanoparticles from experiment and stochastic néel-brown langevin simulation10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.09.041 ↗
48. Lima, E.; De Biasi, E.; Mansilla, M.V.; Saleta, M.E.; Granada, M.; Troiani, H.E.; Effenberger, F.B.; Rossi, L.M.; Rechenberg, H.R.; Zysler, R.D. Heat Generation in Agglomerated Ferrite Nanoparticles in an Alternating Magnetic Field. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2013, 46, 045002, doi:10.1088/0022-3727/46/4/045002.10.1088/0022-3727/46/4/045002 ↗