Structural and magnetic property analysis of bulk and nanocrystalline Ni1.8Mn1.2Sn Heusler alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The effect of nanocrystallite size on crystal structure and magnetic properties of off-stoichiometric Ni1.8Mn1.2Sn Heusler alloy has been investigated. XRD (X-Ray Diffraction) and HRTEM (High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy) analysis revealed the presence of both the full Heusler (Ni2MnSn) L21 and inverse Heusler (Mn2NiSn) XA crystal symmetries. Hence, the sample can be treated as a natural composite of both phases. However, the magnetic analysis reveals that the magnetization does not follow a linear relationship with the volume fraction of the individual phases. Rather, the antiferromagnetic coupling between the two phases may be responsible for lowering the net magnetization. On the other hand, magnetization value further decreases for ball-milled sample (nanocrystallite size). Critical magnetic behavior analysis reveals that the magnetic ordering in bulk sample follows mean field theory, and for nanocrystalline sample, the magnetic ordering is a short-range type.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties · Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Planes · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 310 · 276710.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.1041 ↗
2. Helmholdt · J. Less-Common Metals · 1987 · 128 · 16710.1016/0022-5088(87)90202-5 ↗
3. Paul · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 116
4. Luo · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2009 · 321 · 406310.1016/j.jmmm.2009.08.002 ↗
5. Paul · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2015 · 27
6. Ma · Phys. Rev. B · 2018 · 98
7. Ullakko · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1996 · 69 · 196610.1063/1.117637 ↗
8. A. P. Kamantseva, Y. S. Koshkid’ko, E. O. Bykov, V. S. Kalashnikov, A. V. Koshelev, A. V. Mashirov, I. I. Musabirov, M. A. Paukov, V. V. Sokolovskiy, Phys. Solid State 62 (2020) 815.10.1134/S106378342005011X ↗
9. Duan · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 386 · 10210.1016/j.jmmm.2015.03.047 ↗
10. Paul · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2013 · 25
11. Ma · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112
12. N. V. Rama Rao, V. Chandrasekaran, K. G. Suresh, J. Appl. Phys. 108(2010) 043913.10.1063/1.3467966 ↗
13. Maziarz · J. Alloys Comp. · 2014 · 615 · S17310.1016/j.jallcom.2013.12.164 ↗
14. Krenke · Nat. Mat. · 2005 · 4 · 45010.1038/nmat1395 ↗
15. Krenke · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 7210.1103/PhysRevB.72.014412 ↗
16. Ghosh · AIP Conf. Proc. · 2015 · 1665
17. Buschow · J. Mag. Mag. Mat. · 1984 · 40 · 33910.1016/0304-8853(84)90327-5 ↗
18. R. Sahoo, K. G. Suresh, A. K. Nigam, X. Chen, R. V. Ramanujan, “Effect of ball milling and post annealing on structural and magnetic properties in Ni50Mn36Fe2Sb12 Heusler alloy.”arXiv: Mater. Sci. (2015): n. pag.
19. Paul · AIP Conf. Proc. · 2013 · 1512 · 125810.1063/1.4791509 ↗
20. Samanta · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2020 · 5310.1088/1361-6463/ab7c9f ↗
21. Graf · Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 8210.1103/PhysRevB.82.104420 ↗
22. Graf · J. Inorg. Gen. Chem. · 2009 · 635 · 976
23. Williamson · Acta Metall. · 1953 · 1 · 2210.1016/0001-6160(53)90006-6 ↗
24. Al-Tabbakh · Int. J. Energy Res. · 2019 · 1
25. Monshi · World J. Nano Sci. Eng. · 2012 · 2 · 15410.4236/wjnse.2012.23020 ↗
26. P. Scherrer, Go¨ttinger Nachrichten Math. Phys. 2 (1918) 98.
27. Singh · Appl. Phys. A · 2016 · 122 · 23710.1007/s00339-016-9739-x ↗
28. Mydosh · 1993
29. Nazmunnahar · J. Mag. Mag. Mat. · 2015 · 386 · 9810.1016/j.jmmm.2015.03.066 ↗
30. Khatri · AIP Adv. · 2021 · 1110.1063/9.0000145 ↗
31. Stanley · 1971
32. Widom · J. Chem. Phys. · 1964 · 41 · 163310.1063/1.1726135 ↗
33. Tishin · 2003
34. Xuan · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 10810.1063/1.3511748 ↗
35. Datta · Appl. Phys. A · 2021 · 127 · 12710.1007/s00339-021-04279-1 ↗