Geometric effects in cylindrical core/shell hard–soft exchange-coupled magnetic nanostructures
Source abstract
Abstract
We explore the optimal condition for cylindrical core/shell hard-soft exchange-coupled magnetic nanostructures by obtaining full hysteresis loops for various geometries by obtaining full hysteresis loops for various geometrical variables, including the dimensional scale and soft/hard-magnetic phase volume ratio through micromagnetic simulations. For achieving maximum energy product (BH), it is essential to increase the demagnetizing field by increasing the volume fraction of the soft magnet while maintaining a positive nucleation field and, which can be possible by the scaling-down. To scale up the nanostructure to a bulk magnet having high BH can be achieved by forming an array of needle-shaped exchange-coupled cylinders. These findings could lead to the flexible design and scalable fabrication of exchange-coupled permanent magnets.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties of Alloys · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. McCallum · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2014 · 44 · 45110.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113457 ↗
2. N. Poudyal, J. Ping Liu, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 46 (2013) 043301.10.1088/0022-3727/46/4/043001 ↗
3. Kneller · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1991 · 27 · 358810.1109/20.102931 ↗
4. Skomski · Phys. Rev. B · 1993 · 48 · 1581210.1103/PhysRevB.48.15812 ↗
5. Fullerton · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 200 · 39210.1016/S0304-8853(99)00376-5 ↗
6. Zeng · Nature · 2002 · 420 · 39510.1038/nature01208 ↗
7. Wysocki · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2017 · 428 · 27410.1016/j.jmmm.2016.11.128 ↗
8. Shen · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2013 · 49 · 324410.1109/TMAG.2013.2246781 ↗
9. Skomski · Scr. Mater. · 2016 · 112 · 310.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.09.021 ↗
10. Skomski · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 09A73910.1063/1.3337657 ↗
11. Ke · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2017 · 11110.1063/1.4992787 ↗
12. Chakraborty · Nanomaterials · 2020 · 10 · 130810.3390/nano10071308 ↗
13. Lee · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2019 · 11 · 2622210.1021/acsami.9b02966 ↗
14. Ryo · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2017 · 53 · 740020710.1109/TMAG.2016.2620108 ↗
15. Schärtl · Nanoscale · 2010 · 2 · 82910.1039/c0nr00028k ↗
16. Sebt · J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. · 2012 · P09006
17. Fukunaga · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2013 · 49 · 324010.1109/TMAG.2013.2247030 ↗
18. Chaudhuri · Chem. Rev. · 2012 · 112 · 237310.1021/cr100449n ↗
19. López-ortega · Phys. Rep. · 2015 · 553 · 110.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.007 ↗
20. Jiang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 117 · 17A73410.1063/1.4916543 ↗
21. Zou · J. Rare Earths · 2019 · 37 · 103410.1016/j.jre.2019.03.007 ↗
22. Qiu · J. Rare Earths · 2019 · 37 · 103010.1016/j.jre.2019.04.002 ↗
23. Xiang · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2017 · 430 · 110.1016/j.jmmm.2017.01.057 ↗
24. Kurichenko · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2020 · 3210.1088/1361-648X/ab9f52 ↗
25. Jubert · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2014 · 50 · 3002004
26. Jiang · J. Phys. Condens. Matter · 2014 · 26
27. Vansteenkiste · AIP Adv. · 2014 · 410.1063/1.4899186 ↗
28. Liu · 2009
29. 2006
30. Hadjipanayis · 2013
31. Toson · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2015 · 51 · 740010410.1109/TMAG.2014.2359093 ↗
32. Anagnostopoulou · Nanoscale · 2016 · 8 · 402010.1039/C5NR07143G ↗
33. Coey · 2010