Performance of transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect in double-positive, double-negative and single-negative bi-gyrotropic metamaterials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The properties of optimized transverse magneto-optical Kerr effect (TMOKE) of all-types of bi-gyrotropic metamaterials have been investigated and compared for both s- and p-polarized waves. We demonstrated that double-positive and double-negative ones are capable of achieving maximum TMOKEs, but with the opposite signs. On the other hand, single-negative metamaterials could not provide large TMOKE. In addition, a giant TMOKE can be observed in a special case of metamaterials whose are exhibiting near-zero refractive index. A large TMOKE response is important for applications in magneto-optical data storage and high-definition imaging.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Photonic Crystals and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Chizhik · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 249 · 2710.1016/S0304-8853(02)00499-7 ↗
2. Girón-Sedas · Phys. Rev. B · 2017 · 9610.1103/PhysRevB.96.075415 ↗
3. Kämpf · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 11210.1063/1.4742130 ↗
4. Caballero · ACS Photonics · 2016 · 3 · 20310.1021/acsphotonics.5b00658 ↗
5. Zamani · Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 2452410.1364/OE.20.024524 ↗
6. Keramati · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 11410.1063/1.4812726 ↗
7. Zamani · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2018 · 449 · 43510.1016/j.jmmm.2017.10.072 ↗
8. Kimel · Nature · 2005 · 435 · 65510.1038/nature03564 ↗
9. Moccia · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 11510.1063/1.4862977 ↗
10. Zvezdin · 1997
11. Mansuripur · 1998
12. Grunin · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 9710.1063/1.3533260 ↗
13. Belotelov · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2011 · 6 · 37010.1038/nnano.2011.54 ↗
14. Maier · 2007
15. Temnov · Nat. Photon. · 2010 · 4 · 10710.1038/nphoton.2009.265 ↗
16. Temnov · Nat. Photon. · 2012 · 6 · 72810.1038/nphoton.2012.220 ↗
17. Armelles · Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2013 · 1 · 1010.1002/adom.201200011 ↗
18. Davoyan · Opt. Express · 2013 · 21 · 327910.1364/OE.21.003279 ↗
19. Luo · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2016 · 108
20. Sadatgol · J. Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 11910.1063/1.4943651 ↗
21. Veselago · Usp. Fiz. Nauk · 1967 · 92 · 51710.3367/UFNr.0092.196707d.0517 ↗
22. Smith · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 84 · 418410.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4184 ↗
23. Pendry · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1998 · 10 · 4785
24. Smith · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2000 · 85 · 293310.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2933 ↗
25. Ziolkowski · Phys. Rev. E · 2001 · 6410.1103/PhysRevE.64.056625 ↗
26. Fredkin · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 175310.1063/1.1505119 ↗
27. Zamani · Opt. Mater. · 2016 · 58 · 3810.1016/j.optmat.2016.03.044 ↗
28. Moncada-Villa · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 9010.1103/PhysRevB.90.085120 ↗
29. Amanollahi · Opt. Lett. · 2018 · 43 · 485110.1364/OL.43.004851 ↗
30. Amanollahi · J. Opt. · 2019 · 21 · 03LT0110.1088/2040-8986/ab04dd ↗
31. Amanollahi · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 484 · 23410.1016/j.jmmm.2019.04.036 ↗
32. Tarkhanyan · Prog. Electromagn. Res. B · 2012 · 39 · 5510.2528/PIERB12010705 ↗