Comparison between collective coordinate models for domain wall motion in PMA nanostrips in the presence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Lagrangian-based collective coordinate models for magnetic domain wall (DW) motion rely on an ansatz for the DW profile and a Lagrangian approach to describe the DW motion in terms of a set of time-dependent collective coordinates: the DW position, the DW magnetization angle, the DW width and the DW tilting angle. Another approach was recently used to derive similar equations of motion by averaging the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation without any ansatz, and identifying the relevant collective coordinates afterwards. In this paper, we use an updated version of the semi-analytical equations to compare the Lagrangian-based collective coordinate models with micromagnetic simulations for field- and STT-driven (spin-transfer torque-driven) DW motion in Pt/CoFe/MgO and Pt/Co/AlOx nanostrips. Through this comparison, we assess the accuracy of the different models, and provide insight into the deviations of the models from simulations. It is found that the lack of terms related to DW asymmetry in the Lagrangian-based collective coordinate models significantly contributes to the discrepancy between the predictions of the most accurate Lagrangian-based model and the micromagnetic simulations in the field-driven case. This is in contrast to the STT-driven case where the DW remains symmetric.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Allwood · Science · 2005 · 309 · 168810.1126/science.1108813 ↗
2. Omari · Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2014 · 2 · 04400110.1103/PhysRevApplied.2.044001 ↗
3. Vandermeulen · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 27500310.1088/0022-3727/48/27/275003 ↗
4. Parkin · Science · 2008 · 320 · 19010.1126/science.1145799 ↗
5. Parkin · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2015 · 10 · 19510.1038/nnano.2015.41 ↗
6. Moon · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 916610.1038/srep09166 ↗
7. Katine · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2008 · 320 · 121710.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.013 ↗
8. Slonczewski · Proc. · 1972 · 5 · 170
9. Thiaville · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 704910.1063/1.1667804 ↗
10. Thiaville · Europhys. Lett. · 2005 · 69 · 99010.1209/epl/i2004-10452-6 ↗
11. A. Thiaville and Y. Nakatani, Spin Dynamics in Confined Magnetic Structures III (Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2006), vol. Volume 101/2006 of Topics Appl. Phys., chap. Domain-Wall Dynamics in Nanowires and Nanostrips, pp. 161–205.10.1007/10938171_5 ↗
12. Boulle · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111 · 21720310.1103/PhysRevLett.111.217203 ↗
13. Vandermeulen · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2015 · 48 · 03500110.1088/0022-3727/48/3/035001 ↗
14. Leliaert · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 20240110.1063/1.4921421 ↗
15. Leliaert · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 2047210.1038/srep20472 ↗
16. Vandermeulen · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2016 · 49 · 46500310.1088/0022-3727/49/46/465003 ↗
17. Dzyaloshinskii · Zhur. Eksptl’. i Teoret. Fiz. · 1957 · 33
18. Moriya · Phys. Rev. · 1960 · 120 · 9110.1103/PhysRev.120.91 ↗
19. Bode · Nature · 2007 · 447 · 19010.1038/nature05802 ↗
20. Vedmedenko · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 10443110.1103/PhysRevB.75.104431 ↗
21. Heide · Phys. Rev. B · 2008 · 78 · 14040310.1103/PhysRevB.78.140403 ↗
22. Rohart · Phys. Rev. B · 2013 · 88 · 18442210.1103/PhysRevB.88.184422 ↗
23. Thiaville · Europhys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 5700210.1209/0295-5075/100/57002 ↗
24. Martinez · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 103 · 07240610.1063/1.4818723 ↗
25. Martinez · J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 21390910.1063/1.4881778 ↗
26. Berger · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 54 · 935310.1103/PhysRevB.54.9353 ↗
27. Zhang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 93 · 12720410.1103/PhysRevLett.93.127204 ↗
28. Gilbert · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2004 · 40 · 344310.1109/TMAG.2004.836740 ↗
29. Slonczewski · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 159 · L110.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 ↗
30. Tsoi · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 80 · 428110.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4281 ↗
31. Myers · Science · 1999 · 285 · 86710.1126/science.285.5429.867 ↗
32. Tatara · Phys. Rep. · 2008 · 468 · 21310.1016/j.physrep.2008.07.003 ↗
33. Brataas · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 37210.1038/nmat3311 ↗
34. Slonczewski · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 195 · 26110.1016/S0304-8853(99)00043-8 ↗
35. Tatara · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2004 · 92 · 08660110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.086601 ↗
36. Bogdanov · Soviet Phys. JETP · 1989 · 68
37. Bogdanov · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 03720310.1103/PhysRevLett.87.037203 ↗
38. Aharoni · J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 83 · 343210.1063/1.367113 ↗
39. Vansteenkiste · AIP Adv. · 2014 · 4 · 10713310.1063/1.4899186 ↗
40. Emori · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 18442710.1103/PhysRevB.90.184427 ↗
41. Boulle · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 112 · 05390110.1063/1.4747907 ↗
42. Pizzini · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 04720310.1103/PhysRevLett.113.047203 ↗
43. Schryer · J. Appl. Phys. · 1974 · 45 · 540610.1063/1.1663252 ↗
44. Smith · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107 · 10391010.1063/1.3385387 ↗
45. Porter · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 672910.1063/1.1688673 ↗
46. Thiele · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1973 · 30 · 23010.1103/PhysRevLett.30.230 ↗