Magnetic bubbles and stripe domains in nanostructured FePd elements
Source abstract
Abstract
The analysis of the magnetization process in rectangular thin dots exhibiting a canted anisotropy is reported. The studied dots with quality factor Q≈0.4 are large enough to sustain at least a bi-domain pattern at the remnant state. The various magnetic patterns observed in modeling hysteresis with the external field applied along one of the edges of the dot, moving from one saturated state to the opposite one, are described according to the length of the dots. The facts that the easy axis is tilted with respect to the normal of the dot surface, associated with the limited size of the dots, impose a double flux-closure scheme for the magnetization distribution. The reversal occurs via bubbles nucleation inside the dots followed by the transition to a stripe pattern. Furthermore, it is shown in the description of hysteresis loop that the full magnetization reversal needs successive injections of two sets of Bloch-points. Special attention is paid to topological problems associated with the injection and expulsion of these singularities.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Bader · Rev. Mod. Phys. · 2006 · 78 · 110.1103/RevModPhys.78.1 ↗
2. Cowburn · Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London · 2000 · 358 · 28110.1098/rsta.2000.0532 ↗
3. Spin dynamics in confined magnetic structure (I)
4. Okuno · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 240 · 110.1016/S0304-8853(01)00708-9 ↗
5. Thiaville · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 67 · 09441010.1103/PhysRevB.67.094410 ↗
6. Ding · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 15720210.1103/PhysRevLett.94.157202 ↗
7. Skidmore · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 01241010.1103/PhysRevB.70.012410 ↗
8. Vukadinovic · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 75 · 01442010.1103/PhysRevB.75.014420 ↗
9. Komineas · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 71 · 06040510.1103/PhysRevB.71.060405 ↗
10. Moutafis · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 21440610.1103/PhysRevB.74.214406 ↗
11. Perry · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 314 · 7510.1016/j.jmmm.2007.02.099 ↗
12. Niedoba · Eur. Phys. J. B · 2005 · 47 · 46710.1140/epjb/e2005-00353-6 ↗
13. Aitchison · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2001 · 223 · 13810.1016/S0304-8853(00)00524-2 ↗
14. Puchalska · Phys. Status Solidi (a) · 1974 · 22 · 64710.1002/pssa.2210220232 ↗
15. Kohmoto · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2005 · 41 · 343410.1109/TMAG.2005.858288 ↗
16. Ulmor · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 08250510.1063/1.2032592 ↗
17. Muramatsu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2006 · 408–412 · 33510.1016/j.jallcom.2005.04.077 ↗
18. Niedoba · J. Appl. Phys. · 1983 · 54 · 532210.1063/1.332708 ↗
19. Labrune · J. Appl. Phys. · 1994 · 75 · 215410.1063/1.356276 ↗
20. Layadi · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 17441010.1103/PhysRevB.63.174410 ↗
21. Lisfi · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 63 · 17444110.1103/PhysRevB.63.174441 ↗
22. Muller · Phys. Rev. · 1961 · 122 · 148510.1103/PhysRev.122.1485 ↗
23. Hubert · 1998
24. Cherif · Eur. Phys. J. B · 2005 · 45 · 30510.1140/epjb/e2005-00190-7 ↗
25. LLG Micromagnetic simulator TM, 〈http://llgmicro.home.mindspring.com〉. M.R. Scheinfein.
26. OOMMF wad developed by M.J. Donahue and D. Porter from NIST, see 〈http://math.nist.gov/oommf〉. 3d version of the 1.2a3 release.
27. 1979
28. Dittrich · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 250 · L1210.1016/S0304-8853(02)00388-8 ↗
29. Demand · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2002 · 247 · 14710.1016/S0304-8853(02)00031-8 ↗
30. Ferré · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1997 · 165 · 910.1016/S0304-8853(96)00462-3 ↗