The role of the magnetically induced anisotropy of the pair correlation function in the dichroism of magnetic fluids
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Experimental evidence is presented that the susceptibility for magnetically induced dichroism in concentrated magnetic fluids decays with further increasing of the magnetic nanoparticle concentration. The analysis of the predictions derived from our dichroism model, based on the pair correlation function developed by Elfimova and Ivanov (2010), showed that the observed phenomenon can be explained by the manner in which the symmetry of the pair correlation function changes with increasing magnetic field intensity and sample concentration. The increase of the dichroism with increasing concentration in diluted samples (0.2–1%) is mainly caused by the pair correlations in the first coordination layer, predominantly along the magnetic field direction. In the 1–3% concentration range, the first coordination layer becomes increasingly isotropic while pair correlations in the second coordination layer grow transversally to the magnetic field direction. Thus, with the increase of the concentration above 2%, the dichroism decreases as a combined effect of the changes in the symmetry of the pair correlations in the first and the second coordination layers. The proposed dichroism model predicts the possibility of negative magnetically induced dichroism in highly concentrated perfect colloidal dispersions of small spherical magnetic nanoparticles.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies · Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Rosensweig · 1985
2. 1996
3. Skibin · Soviet Physics JETP · 1977 · 45 · 496
4. Taketomi · 1991
5. Hasmonay · European Physical Journal B · 1998 · 5 · 85910.1007/s100510050512 ↗
6. Socoliuc · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2005 · 289 · 17710.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.052 ↗
7. Zubarev · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics · 1995 · 80 · 857
8. Socoliuc · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 1999 · 207 · 14610.1016/S0304-8853(99)00533-8 ↗
9. Ivanov · Physical Review E · 2004 · 70 · 02140110.1103/PhysRevE.70.021401 ↗
10. Mendelev · Physical Review E · 2004 · 70 · 05150210.1103/PhysRevE.70.051502 ↗
11. Socoliuc · Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials · 2012 · 324 · 11310.1016/j.jmmm.2011.07.028 ↗
12. Ivanov · Physical Review E · 2001 · 64 · 04140510.1103/PhysRevE.64.041405 ↗
13. Popescu · Romanian Journal of Physics · 2006 · 51 · 791
14. Zubarev · Colloid Journal · 2012 · 74 · 69510.1134/S1061933X12060191 ↗
15. Socoliuc · Physica A · 2011 · 390 · 56910.1016/j.physa.2010.10.044 ↗
16. Elfimova · Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics · 2010 · 111 · 14610.1134/S1063776110070149 ↗
17. Elfimova · Journal of Chemical Physics · 2012 · 136 · 19450210.1063/1.4717718 ↗
18. Bica · Romanian Reports in Physics · 1995 · 47 · 265
19. Rasa · European Physical Journal E · 2000 · 2 · 26510.1007/PL00013670 ↗
20. Socoliuc · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · 2003 · 264 · 14110.1016/S0021-9797(03)00426-0 ↗
21. Susan-Resiga · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · 2012 · 373 · 11010.1016/j.jcis.2011.10.060 ↗
22. Aksenov · Materials Science and Processing · 2002 · 74 · S94310.1007/s003390201674 ↗